Literature DB >> 25962549

A systematic revision of Proconsul with the description of a new genus of early Miocene hominoid.

Kieran P McNulty1, David R Begun2, Jay Kelley3, Fredrick K Manthi4, Emma N Mbua4.   

Abstract

For more than 80 years, Proconsul has held a pivotal position in interpretations of catarrhine evolution and hominoid diversification in East Africa. The majority of what we 'know' about Proconsul, however, derives from abundant younger fossils found at the Kisingiri localities on Rusinga and Mfangano Islands rather than from the smaller samples found at Koru--the locality of the type species, Proconsul africanus--and other Tinderet deposits. One outcome of this is seen in recent attempts to expand the genus "Ugandapithecus" (considered here a junior subjective synonym of Proconsul), wherein much of the Tinderet sample was referred to that genus based primarily on differentiating it from the Kisingiri specimens rather than from the type species, P. africanus. This and other recent taxonomic revisions to Proconsul prompted us to undertake a systematic review of dentognathic specimens attributed to this taxon. Results of our study underscore and extend the substantive distinction of Tinderet and Ugandan Proconsul (i.e., Proconsul sensu stricto) from the Kisingiri fossils, the latter recognized here as a new genus. Specimens of the new genus are readily distinguished from Proconsul sensu stricto by morphology preserved in the P. africanus holotype, but also in I(1)s, lower incisors, upper and lower canines, and especially mandibular characteristics. A number of these differences are more advanced among Kisingiri specimens in the direction of crown hominoids. Proconsul sensu stricto is characterized by a suite of unique features that strongly unite the included species as a clade. There have been decades of contentious debate over the phylogenetic placement of Proconsul (sensu lato), due in part to there being a mixture of primitive and more advanced morphology within the single genus. By recognizing two distinct clades that, in large part, segregate these character states, we believe that better phylogenetic resolution can be achieved.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ekembo; Fossil ape; Rusinga; Taxonomy; Tinderet; Ugandapithecus

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25962549     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  7 in total

Review 1.  Morphology and environment in some fossil Hominoids and Pedetids (Mammalia).

Authors:  Brigitte Senut
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Substrate use drives the macroevolution of mammalian tail length diversity.

Authors:  Sarah T Mincer; Gabrielle A Russo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Three-dimensional kinematics and the origin of the hominin walking stride.

Authors:  Matthew C O'Neill; Brigitte Demes; Nathan E Thompson; Brian R Umberger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Wrist morphology reveals substantial locomotor diversity among early catarrhines: an analysis of capitates from the early Miocene of Tinderet (Kenya).

Authors:  Craig Wuthrich; Laura M MacLatchy; Isaiah O Nengo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  First steps of bipedality in hominids: evidence from the atelid and proconsulid pelvis.

Authors:  Allison L Machnicki; Linda B Spurlock; Karen B Strier; Philip L Reno; C Owen Lovejoy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Hip extensor mechanics and the evolution of walking and climbing capabilities in humans, apes, and fossil hominins.

Authors:  Elaine E Kozma; Nicole M Webb; William E H Harcourt-Smith; David A Raichlen; Kristiaan D'Août; Mary H Brown; Emma M Finestone; Stephen R Ross; Peter Aerts; Herman Pontzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evidence of a chimpanzee-sized ancestor of humans but a gibbon-sized ancestor of apes.

Authors:  Mark Grabowski; William L Jungers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.