| Literature DB >> 25962412 |
Callie Ridenour1, Adam Johnson1, Emily Winne2,3, Jaber Hossain1, Guaniri Mateu-Petit1, Amanda Balish1, Wanda Santana2, Taejoong Kim1, Charles Davis1, Nancy J Cox1, John R Barr2, Ruben O Donis1, Julie Villanueva1, Tracie L Williams2, Li-Mei Chen1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The emergence of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus in poultry causing zoonotic human infections was reported on March 31, 2013. Development of A(H7N9) candidate vaccine viruses (CVV) for pandemic preparedness purposes was initiated without delay. Candidate vaccine viruses were derived by reverse genetics using the internal genes of A/Puerto/Rico/8/34 (PR8). The resulting A(H7N9) CVVs needed improvement because they had titers and antigen yields that were suboptimal for vaccine manufacturing in eggs, especially in a pandemic situation.Entities:
Keywords: Antigen yield; H7N9; hemagglutinin; influenza; serial passage; vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25962412 PMCID: PMC4548996 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12322
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses ISSN: 1750-2640 Impact factor: 4.380
Figure 1Quantification of viral protein as compared to the high growth A(H1N1)pdm09 reassortant X-181A. (A) Quantification of total viral protein, shown as mg total viral protein/100 eggs. (B) Quantification of HA antigen, shown as mg HA/100 eggs. Values shown are the average of at least two independent experiments with errors bars denoting standard deviation.
Figure 2Yield analysis of egg-passaged reassortant viruses as compared to parental virus yield (A) Quantification of total viral protein, shown as mg total viral protein/100 eggs. (B) Quantification of HA antigen, shown as mg HA/100 eggs. Values shown are the average of at least two independent experiments with errors bars denoting standard deviation.
Properties of A(H7N9) PR8 CVV after serial passage in eggs
| Virus | Sequence Changes in HA | EID50/ml | HA titer | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDCDC-RG32A.1 | N149D | – | – | – | – | – | – | 109·5 | 1024 |
| IDCDC-RG32A.2 | N149D | G196E | – | – | – | – | – | 109·7 | 1024 |
| IDCDC-RG32A.3 | N149D | – | L217Q | 109·6 | 1024 | ||||
| IDCDC-RG32B.1 | – | G196E | – | – | – | – | – | 109·9 | 1024 |
| IDCDC-RG32B.2 | – | G196E | – | G189E | E96K | – | – | 1010 | 1024 |
| IDCDC-RG32B.3 | – | G196E | – | – | – | R130M | – | 109·7 | 512 |
| IDCDC-RG32B.4 | – | G196E | L217Q | – | – | – | P89S | 109·2 | 1024 |
| IDCDC-RG32B.5 | – | G196E | – | G189E | – | – | – | 109·5 | 1024 |
Underlined text indicates a virus stock from which subsequent viruses were derived (rows below).
Mature H7 HA numbering system was used.
EID50 was calculated according to Reed and Muench method.
Figure 3Yield analysis of second-generation reassortant viruses derived from parental CVV. (A) Quantification of total viral protein, shown as mg total viral protein/100 eggs (B) Quantification of HA antigen, shown as mg HA/100 eggs. Values shown are the average of at least two independent experiments with errors bars denoting standard deviation.
Viral protein molar ratios and HA content of concentrated virions
| Virus | HA/NP ratio | HA/M1 ratio | HA(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDCDC-RG32A | 2·26 | 0·79 | 39·4 |
| IDCDC-RG32A.1 | 1·97 | 0·62 | 37·9 |
| IDCDC-RG32A.2 | 1·88 | 0·72 | 37·7 |
| IDCDC-RG32A.3 | 1·87 | 0·71 | 39·6 |
| IDCDC-RG32B | 1·91 | 0·78 | 32·8 |
| IDCDC-RG32B.1 | 2·10 | 0·86 | 44·9 |
| IDCDC-RG32B.2 | 1·92 | 0·79 | 28·9 |
| IDCDC-RG32B.3 | 2·17 | 0·89 | 35·4 |
| IDCDC-RG32B.4 | 1·85 | 0·80 | 48·0 |
| IDCDC-RG32B.5 | 2·18 | 0·89 | 49·6 |
Underlined text as in Table1.
Values shown are the average of at least two independent experiments.
Viral protein concentrations were determined by IDMS as described in Methods.
Calculated as follows: HA protein by IDMS/total protein by BCA assay.
Antigenic analysis of candidate vaccine viruses by hemagglutination inhibition
| Virus | Ferret antiserum | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A/Anhui/1/13 | IDCDC-RG32A | IDCDC-RG32A.2 | IDCDC-RG32A.3 | |
| A/Anhui/1/2013 | 320 | 40 | 80 | |
| IDCDC-RG32A | 320 | 40 | 160 | |
| IDCDC-RG32A.2 | 320 | 640 | 640 | |
| IDCDC-RG32A.3 | 80 | 160 | 80 | |
Boldface/underlined values denote titers of ferret sera with homologous antigens.
Ferret antisera was collected after antigen boost by intradermal injection.
Ferret was boosted with adjuvanted antigen.