Literature DB >> 25961931

Direct relationship between the level of p53 stabilization induced by rRNA synthesis-inhibiting drugs and the cell ribosome biogenesis rate.

F Scala1, E Brighenti1, M Govoni1, E Imbrogno1, F Fornari2, D Treré1, L Montanaro1, M Derenzini1.   

Abstract

Many drugs currently used in chemotherapy work by hindering the process of ribosome biogenesis. In tumors with functional p53, the inhibition of ribosome biogenesis may contribute to the efficacy of this treatment by inducing p53 stabilization. As the level of stabilized p53 is critical for the induction of cytotoxic effects, it seems useful to highlight those cancer cell characteristics that can predict the degree of p53 stabilization following the treatment with inhibitors of ribosome biogenesis. In the present study we exposed a series of p53 wild-type human cancer cell lines to drugs such as actinomycin D (ActD), doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil and CX-5461, which hinder ribosomal RNA (rRNA) synthesis. We found that the amount of stabilized p53 was directly related to the level of ribosome biogenesis in cells before the drug treatment. This was due to different levels of inactivation of the ribosomal proteins-MDM2 pathway of p53 digestion. Inhibition of rRNA synthesis always caused cell cycle arrest, independent of the ribosome biogenesis rate of the cells, whereas apoptosis occurred only in cells with a high rDNA transcription rate. The level of p53 stabilization induced by drugs acting in different ways from the inhibition of ribosome biogenesis, such as hydroxyurea (HU) and nutlin-3, was independent of the level of ribosome biogenesis in cells and always lower than that occurring after the inhibition of rRNA synthesis. Interestingly, in cells with a low ribosome biogenesis rate, the combined treatment with ActD and HU exerted an additive effect on p53 stabilization. These results indicated that (i) drugs inhibiting ribosome biogenesis may be highly effective in p53 wild-type cancers with a high ribosome biogenesis rate, as they induce apoptotic cell death, and (ii) the combination of drugs capable of stabilizing p53 through different mechanisms may be useful for treating cancers with a low ribosome biogenesis rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25961931     DOI: 10.1038/onc.2015.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  55 in total

1.  PUMA, a novel proapoptotic gene, is induced by p53.

Authors:  K Nakano; K H Vousden
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Cooperative phosphorylation at multiple sites is required to activate p53 in response to UV radiation.

Authors:  M Kapoor; R Hamm; W Yan; Y Taya; G Lozano
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Regulation of HDM2 activity by the ribosomal protein L11.

Authors:  Marion A E Lohrum; Robert L Ludwig; Michael H G Kubbutat; Mary Hanlon; Karen H Vousden
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 31.743

4.  Key role of the achievement of an appropriate ribosomal RNA complement for G1-S phase transition in H4-II-E-C3 rat hepatoma cells.

Authors:  Massimo Derenzini; Lorenzo Montanaro; Alessandra Chillà; Elena Tosti; Manuela Vici; Stefania Barbieri; Marzia Govoni; Giuliano Mazzini; Davide Treré
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.384

5.  The Myc trilogy: lord of RNA polymerases.

Authors:  Thordur Oskarsson; Andreas Trumpp
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 6.  The p53 pathway: positive and negative feedback loops.

Authors:  Sandra L Harris; Arnold J Levine
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-04-18       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  5-fluorouracil activation of p53 involves an MDM2-ribosomal protein interaction.

Authors:  Xiao-Xin Sun; Mu-Shui Dai; Hua Lu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Emerging roles of caspase-3 in apoptosis.

Authors:  A G Porter; R U Jänicke
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 15.828

9.  Inhibition of HDM2 and activation of p53 by ribosomal protein L23.

Authors:  Aiwen Jin; Koji Itahana; Kevin O'Keefe; Yanping Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Anticancer activity of CX-3543: a direct inhibitor of rRNA biogenesis.

Authors:  Denis Drygin; Adam Siddiqui-Jain; Sean O'Brien; Michael Schwaebe; Amy Lin; Josh Bliesath; Caroline B Ho; Chris Proffitt; Katy Trent; Jeffrey P Whitten; John K C Lim; Daniel Von Hoff; Kenna Anderes; William G Rice
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  27 in total

1.  RNA Polymerase I Inhibition with CX-5461 as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy to Target MYC in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Hans C Lee; Hua Wang; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Heather Lin; Jin He; Richard J Jones; Isere Kuiatse; Dongmin Gu; Zhiqiang Wang; Wencai Ma; John Lim; Sean O'Brien; Jonathan Keats; Jing Yang; Richard E Davis; Robert Z Orlowski
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Acquisition of Chemoresistance and Other Malignancy-related Features of Colorectal Cancer Cells Are Incremented by Ribosome-inactivating Stress.

Authors:  Chang-Kyu Oh; Seung Joon Lee; Seong-Hwan Park; Yuseok Moon
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  In vitro Assessment of RNA Polymerase I Activity.

Authors:  Marzia Govoni
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2017-02-05

4.  Dynamic regulation and requirement for ribosomal RNA transcription during mammalian development.

Authors:  Karla T Falcon; Kristin E N Watt; Soma Dash; Ruonan Zhao; Daisuke Sakai; Emma L Moore; Sharien Fitriasari; Melissa Childers; Mihaela E Sardiu; Selene Swanson; Dai Tsuchiya; Jay Unruh; George Bugarinovic; Lin Li; Rita Shiang; Annita Achilleos; Jill Dixon; Michael J Dixon; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 5.  RNA Polymerases I and III in development and disease.

Authors:  Kristin En Watt; Julia Macintosh; Geneviève Bernard; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 7.499

6.  tp53-dependent and independent signaling underlies the pathogenesis and possible prevention of Acrofacial Dysostosis-Cincinnati type.

Authors:  Kristin E N Watt; Cynthia L Neben; Shawn Hall; Amy E Merrill; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 7.  Nucleolus-derived mediators in oncogenic stress response and activation of p53-dependent pathways.

Authors:  Dariusz Stępiński
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.304

8.  Transient rRNA synthesis inhibition with CX-5461 is sufficient to elicit growth arrest and cell death in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells.

Authors:  Sandeep S Negi; Patrick Brown
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-27

Review 9.  Novel Implications of DNA Damage Response in Drug Resistance of Malignant Cancers Obtained from the Functional Interaction between p53 Family and RUNX2.

Authors:  Toshinori Ozaki; Mizuyo Nakamura; Osamu Shimozato
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2015-10-23

10.  Human Ribosomal RNA-Derived Resident MicroRNAs as the Transmitter of Information upon the Cytoplasmic Cancer Stress.

Authors:  Masaru Yoshikawa; Yoichi Robertus Fujii
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.