Wallace T Miller1, Lawrence A Marinari2, Eduardo Barbosa1, Harold I Litt1, James E Schmitt1, Anton Mahne3, Victor Lee4, Scott R Akers5. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia Pennsylvania. 2. 2 Department of Medicine, and. 3. 3 Department of Radiology and Outpatient Diagnostic Testing, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey; and. 4. 4 Department of Radiology, The Bryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. 5. 5 Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the rate of agreement of pulmonary embolism diagnosis in computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiogram studies and to evaluate the rate of inaccurate interpretations in the community hospital setting. METHODS: Using the keywords "pulmonary embolism/embolus/emboli," the radiology information system was searched for CT pulmonary angiograms performed over a 3-year period at three U.S. community hospitals. Studies containing probable or definite pulmonary emboli were independently reviewed by four subspecialty thoracic radiologists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Agreement about the presence of pulmonary embolism progressively decreased with decreasing diameter of pulmonary vascular lesions (P < 0.0001). There was a sharp fall in observer agreement for pulmonary embolism of subsegmental lesions (P < 0.0001). The frequency of agreement decreased with decreasing quality of the imaging examination (P < 0.0001). Community radiologists were prone to false-positive pulmonary embolism diagnosis of subsegmental and/or small pulmonary arterial defects. The probability of a false-positive diagnosis and indeterminate examinations progressively increased with: (1) more peripheral location of the lesion, (2) decreased size (short-axis diameter) of the lesion, and (3) diminishing quality of the CT examination. Forty-eight of 177 (27%) of subsegmental vascular defects identified by community radiologists were deemed indeterminate, and 27 of 177 (15%) of subsegmental vascular defects were judged to be false positive for pulmonary embolism by the consensus diagnosis. Fifty-four of 274 (20%) vascular defects with short axis less than 6 mm were indeterminate for pulmonary embolism, and 37 of 274 (14%) of vascular defects with short axis less than 6 mm were false positive for pulmonary embolism. Eleven of 13 (85%) of vascular lesions identified as pulmonary emboli on the lowest-quality CT examinations were false positive or indeterminate for pulmonary embolism. False-positive examinations were most often due to respiratory motion artifact (19/38, 50%). CONCLUSIONS: There is relatively poor interobserver agreement for subsegmental and/or small pulmonary artery defects, especially in CT pulmonary angiograms degraded by technical artifacts. These factors can lead to an increased frequency of inaccurate interpretation or indeterminate diagnosis of subsegmental and/or small defects. Caution is indicated in interpreting the significance of small vascular defects in CT pulmonary angiograms.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the rate of agreement of pulmonary embolism diagnosis in computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiogram studies and to evaluate the rate of inaccurate interpretations in the community hospital setting. METHODS: Using the keywords "pulmonary embolism/embolus/emboli," the radiology information system was searched for CT pulmonary angiograms performed over a 3-year period at three U.S. community hospitals. Studies containing probable or definite pulmonary emboli were independently reviewed by four subspecialty thoracic radiologists. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Agreement about the presence of pulmonary embolism progressively decreased with decreasing diameter of pulmonary vascular lesions (P < 0.0001). There was a sharp fall in observer agreement for pulmonary embolism of subsegmental lesions (P < 0.0001). The frequency of agreement decreased with decreasing quality of the imaging examination (P < 0.0001). Community radiologists were prone to false-positive pulmonary embolism diagnosis of subsegmental and/or small pulmonary arterial defects. The probability of a false-positive diagnosis and indeterminate examinations progressively increased with: (1) more peripheral location of the lesion, (2) decreased size (short-axis diameter) of the lesion, and (3) diminishing quality of the CT examination. Forty-eight of 177 (27%) of subsegmental vascular defects identified by community radiologists were deemed indeterminate, and 27 of 177 (15%) of subsegmental vascular defects were judged to be false positive for pulmonary embolism by the consensus diagnosis. Fifty-four of 274 (20%) vascular defects with short axis less than 6 mm were indeterminate for pulmonary embolism, and 37 of 274 (14%) of vascular defects with short axis less than 6 mm were false positive for pulmonary embolism. Eleven of 13 (85%) of vascular lesions identified as pulmonary emboli on the lowest-quality CT examinations were false positive or indeterminate for pulmonary embolism. False-positive examinations were most often due to respiratory motion artifact (19/38, 50%). CONCLUSIONS: There is relatively poor interobserver agreement for subsegmental and/or small pulmonary artery defects, especially in CT pulmonary angiograms degraded by technical artifacts. These factors can lead to an increased frequency of inaccurate interpretation or indeterminate diagnosis of subsegmental and/or small defects. Caution is indicated in interpreting the significance of small vascular defects in CT pulmonary angiograms.
Authors: Robert Russell Ehrman; Adrienne Nicole Malik; Reid Kenneth Smith; Zeid Kalarikkal; Andrew Huang; Ryan Michael King; Rubin David Green; Brian James O'Neil; Robert Leigh Sherwin Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2021-03-20 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Robert Alexander; Stephen Waite; Michael A Bruno; Elizabeth A Krupinski; Leonard Berlin; Stephen Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde Journal: Radiology Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: David Mountain; Gerben Keijzers; Kevin Chu; Anthony Joseph; Catherine Read; Gabriel Blecher; Jeremy Furyk; Chrianna Bharat; Karthik Velusamy; Andrew Munro; Kylie Baker; Frances Kinnear; Ahses Mukherjee; Gina Watkins; Paul Buntine; Georgia Livesay; Daniel Fatovich Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Liselotte M van der Pol; Ingrid M Bistervels; Thijs E van Mens; Tom van der Hulle; Ludo F M Beenen; Paul L den Exter; Lucia J M Kroft; Albert T A Mairuhu; Saskia Middeldorp; Jaap M van Werkhoven; Marije Ten Wolde; Menno V Huisman; Frederikus A Klok Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Paul L den Exter; Lucia J M Kroft; Carol Gonsalves; Gregoire Le Gal; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; Marc Carrier; Menno V Huisman; Frederikus A Klok Journal: Res Pract Thromb Haemost Date: 2020-10-01