| Literature DB >> 25961010 |
Julius Bogomolovas1, Kathrin Brohm2, Jelena Čelutkienė3, Giedrė Balčiūnaitė3, Daiva Bironaitė4, Virginija Bukelskienė5, Dainius Daunoravičus6, Christian C Witt2, Jens Fielitz7, Virginija Grabauskienė6, Siegfried Labeit2.
Abstract
Progression of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) is marked with extensive left ventricular remodeling whose clinical manifestations and molecular basis are poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate the clinical potential of titin ligands in monitoring progression of cardiac remodeling associated with end-stage IDCM. Expression patterns of 8 mechanoptotic machinery-associated titin ligands (ANKRD1, ANKRD2, TRIM63, TRIM55, NBR1, MLP, FHL2, and TCAP) were quantitated in endomyocardial biopsies from 25 patients with advanced IDCM. When comparing NYHA disease stages, elevated ANKRD1 expression levels marked transition from NYHA < IV to NYHA IV. ANKRD1 expression levels closely correlated with systolic strain depression and short E wave deceleration time, as determined by echocardiography. On molecular level, myocardial ANKRD1 and serum adiponectin correlated with low BAX/BCL-2 ratios, indicative of antiapoptotic tissue propensity observed during the worsening of heart failure. ANKRD1 is a potential marker for cardiac remodeling and disease progression in IDCM. ANKRD1 expression correlated with reduced cardiac contractility and compliance. The association of ANKRD1 with antiapoptotic response suggests its role as myocyte survival factor during late stage heart disease, warranting further studies on ANKRD1 during end-stage heart failure.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25961010 PMCID: PMC4415747 DOI: 10.1155/2015/273936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Differences in myocardial expression patterns of titin ligands according to NYHA functional class
| Transcript level (−Δ | NYHA class |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| <IV | IV | ||
|
| −9.42 ± 0.7 | −6.83 ± 0.7 | 0.01 |
|
| −16.79 ± 0.7 | −14.5 ± 0.8 | 0.03 |
|
| −13.81 ± 0.6 | −11.82 ± 0.5 | 0.03 |
|
| −14.23 ± 0.8 | −13.11 ± 0.7 | 0.25 |
|
| −11.97 ± 0.7 | −11.73 ± 0.9 | 0.44 |
|
| −10.39 ± 1.0 | −9.15 ± 0.9 | 0.20 |
|
| −10.07 ± 0.8 | −9.75 ± 0.6 | 0.56 |
|
| −7.08 ± 0.9 | −6.16 ± 0.8 | 0.30 |
|
| −17.81 ± 0.4 | −16.25 ± 0.7 | 0.02 |
|
| −15.71 ± 0.3 | −14.39 ± 0.9 | 0.22 |
Significant differences (P value < 0.05 of the Mann-Whitney U test) marked with ∗.
Patient characteristics.
| NYHA class | ||
|---|---|---|
| <IV | IV | |
| Age (years) | 44.2 ± 14.2 | 43.5 ± 13.9 |
| Sex | ||
| Female | 4 | 1 |
| Male | 15 | 5 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.7 ± 4.7 | 28.7 ± 5.1 |
| NYHA class | ||
| II | 1 | |
| III | 16 | |
| III-IV | 2 | |
| IV | 6 | |
| BNP (pg/mL) | 1259 ± 1180 | 1964 ± 1177 |
| TnT (pg/mL) | 80.9 ± 143.5 | 34.4 ± 13.9 |
| Adiponectin ( | 22.9 ± 12.6 | 33.8 ± 17.5 |
| LVEF (%) | 24.1 ± 7.4 | 20.1 ± 6.2 |
| LVESD (mm) | 58.2 ± 9.9 | 64.3 ± 10.2 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 67.3 ± 7.4 | 71.1 ± 12 |
| RAP (mmHg) | 12.5 ± 7.3 | 16.2 ± 11 |
| PAP (mmHg) | 32.2 ± 12.1 | 43.2 ± 15.8 |
| PCWP (mmHg) | 23 ± 9.1 | 31.8 ± 14.2 |
| PVR (Wood units) | 2.5 ± 1.7 | 3.2 ± 0.8 |
| E wave (m/s) | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1 ± 0.3 |
| A wave (m/s) | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.1 |
| E/A | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 2.3 ± 0.4 |
| E wave | 140.1 ± 35.2 | 109 ± 45.4 |
Figure 1Myocardial titin ligand expression patterns associate with disease progression in IDCM patients. Statistically significant titin ligand expression differences represented as bar graph. Data are presented as mean ± 2 s.e.m. Note the highest expression level and the most pronounced difference between groups in ANKRD1 expression pattern.
Differences in strain parameters between NYHA
| Strain parameter | NYHA class |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| <IV | IV | ||
| 4C strain (%) | −7.4 ± 1 | −4 ± 0.8 | 0.10 |
| 4C strain rate (s−1) | −0.4 ± 0 | −0.2 ± 0 | 0.10 |
| 2C strain (%) | −6.7 ± 0.9 | −5.1 ± 0.9 | 0.25 |
| 2C strain rate (s−1) | −0.3 ± 0 | −0.3 ± 0 | 0.34 |
| 3C strain (%)∗ | −8.1 ± 0.8 | −3.9 ± 1.1 | 0.01 |
| 3C strain rate (s−1) | −0.8 ± 0.4 | −0.2 ± 0 | 0.11 |
| Circumferential strain (%) | −5.5 ± 0.5 | −4.3 ± 1.2 | 0.51 |
| Circumferential strain rate (s−1) | −0.4 ± 0 | −0.2 ± 0 | 0.20 |
| Radial strain (%)∗ | 17.4 ± 2.3 | 6.1 ± 1.7 | 0.01 |
| Radial strain rate (s−1) | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.11 |
Note further reduction of systolic strain parameters along disease progression.
Significant differences (P value < 0.05 of the Mann-Whitney U test) marked with ∗.
Figure 2Increased ANKRD1 expression marks left ventricular remodeling. (a) Linear correlation between ANKRD1 expression and radial stain. Regression line is represented within 95% confidence interval for the mean value. A negative correlation between ANKRD1 expression (−C ) and radial strain (RS; %) was found (n = 14, r = −0.54, P < 0.05). (b) Linear correlation between ANKRD1 expression and E wave deceleration time. Regression line is represented within 95% confidence interval for the mean value. A negative correlation between ANKRD1 expression (−C ) and E wave deceleration time (ms) was detected (n = 21, r = −0.495, P < 0.05).
Clinical characteristics of patients (n = 14) with high radial strain (RS, above median) and low RS (below median).
| Radial strain | ||
|---|---|---|
| Below median | Above median | |
| Age (years) | 48 ± 6.51 | 44 ± 3.3 |
| Sex | ||
| Female | 2 | 3 |
| Male | 5 | 4 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.6 ± 2.0 | 27.03 ± 2.13 |
| NYHA class | ||
| III | 3 | 5 |
| III-IV | 0 | 2 |
| IV | 4 | 0 |
| BNP (pg/mL)∗ | 1824 ± 461 | 525 ± 197 |
| TnT (pg/mL) | 31.17 ± 6.1 | 157 ± 136.4 |
| Adiponectin ( | 35 ± 5.4 | 8.5 ± 1.8 |
| LVEF (%) | 21.29 ± 1.1 | 25.29 ± 3.34 |
| LVESD (mm) | 61 ± 2.1 | 55.5 ± 2.1 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 71.3 ± 2.1 | 65.6 ± 1.7 |
| RAP (mmHg) | 12.33 ± 3.9 | 9.33 ± 1.28 |
| PAP (mmHg) | 32.6 ± 4.7 | 25.3 ± 1.91 |
| PCWP (mmHg) | 23.14 ± 3.8 | 18.17 ± 1.51 |
| PVR (Wood units) | 2.5 ± 0.44 | 2.025 ± 0.55 |
| E wave (m/s) | 1 ± 0.11 | 0.92 ± 0.06 |
| A wave (m/s) | 0.398 ± 0.05 | 0.63 ± 0.095 |
| E/A | 2.71 ± 0.36 | 1.86 ± 0.48 |
| E wave | 118 ± 12 | 146 ± 15.42 |
| 3C strain (%)∗ | −5.07 ± 0.96 | −8.75 ± 0.98 |
| Radial strain (%)∗ | 7.39 ± 1.23 | 21.1 ± 1.95 |
| Radial strain rate (s−1)∗ | 0.88 ± 0.19 | 1.55 ± 0.13 |
|
| −7.02 ± 1.1 | −10.26 ± 0.68 |
|
| −16.36 ± 1.0 | −18.67 ± 0.22 |
|
| −14.60 ± 1.0 | −16.02 ± 0.17 |
|
| 1.76 ± 0.27 | 2.65 ± 0.19 |
| Active caspase-3 (ng/mg)† | 0.19 ± 0.06 | 0.45 ± 0.11 |
∗ P two-sided< 0.05; † P one-sided < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney U test).
Figure 3ANKRD1 and adiponectin upregulation are associated with antiapoptotic response in progression of IDCM. (a) Difference in BAX/BCL-2 ratio between high and low RS groups. Data are presented as mean ± 2 s.e.m; P value < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney U test). (b) Relative expression levels of BAX and BCL-2. Data are presented as mean ± 2 s.e.m. P one-sided value < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney U test). (c) Difference in active caspase-3 levels between high and low RS groups. Data are presented as mean ± 2 s.e.m; P one-sided value < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney U test); n = 6 (lower RS); n = 5 (higher RS).
Figure 4ANKRD1 and adiponectin correlate with tissue propensity to apoptosis. (a) Linear correlation between ANKRD1 expression and BAX/BCL-2 ratio. Regression line is represented within 95% confidence interval for the mean value. A negative correlation between ANKRD1 expression (−C ) and BAX/BCL-2 ratio (C ) was found (n = 25, r = −0.505, P = 0.01). (b) Linear correlation between adiponectin levels and BAX/BCL-2 ratio. Regression line is represented within 95% confidence interval for the mean value. A negative correlation between serum adiponectin levels (μg/mL) and cardiac BAX/BCL-2 ratio (C ) was observed (n = 20, r = −0.578, P < 0.01).
Figure 5Antiapoptotic response in end-stage IDCM. Speculatively, ongoing apoptosis and myocyte overstretch in vicious cycle mediate the LV remodeling, whereas myocyte stretch induces Ankrd1 expression and increases adiponectin levels by unknown mechanism that in turn inhibit apoptotic signaling. Arrows indicate process dynamics in NYHA