Conjugated polymers with cyclic structures are interesting because their symmetry leads to unique electronic properties. Recent advances in Vernier templating now allow large shape-persistent fully conjugated porphyrin nanorings to be synthesized, exhibiting unique electronic properties. We examine the impact of different conformations on exciton delocalization and emission depolarization in a range of different porphyrin nanoring topologies with comparable spatial extent. Low photoluminescence anisotropy values are found to occur within the first few hundred femtoseconds after pulsed excitation, suggesting ultrafast delocalization of excitons across the nanoring structures. Molecular dynamics simulations show that further polarization memory loss is caused by out-of-plane distortions associated with twisting and bending of the templated nanoring topologies.
Conjugated polymers with cyclic structures are interesting because their symmetry leads to unique electronic properties. Recent advances in Vernier templating now allow large shape-persistent fully conjugated porphyrin nanorings to be synthesized, exhibiting unique electronic properties. We examine the impact of different conformations on exciton delocalization and emission depolarization in a range of different porphyrin nanoring topologies with comparable spatial extent. Low photoluminescence anisotropy values are found to occur within the first few hundred femtoseconds after pulsed excitation, suggesting ultrafast delocalization of excitons across the nanoring structures. Molecular dynamics simulations show that further polarization memory loss is caused by out-of-plane distortions associated with twisting and bending of the templated nanoring topologies.
Conjugated polymers
have been studied extensively because of their
semiconducting and optical properties, which offer great potential
for a diverse range of applications[1] such
as organic light-emitting diodes,[2,3] field-effect
transistors,[4,5] and polymer solar cells.[6,7] Recently, macrocycles have attracted increasing attention as quasi-infinite
π-conjugated systems exhibiting unique electronic and optical
behavior.[8] Several studies have investigated
electron or energy transfer, nonlinear optical phenomena, and topological
effects in these structures.[9−14]A promising approach to synthesis of nanosized fully π-conjugated
macrocycles based on porphyrin units has been developed using template-directed
self-assembly.[15,16] However, the difficulty of synthesizing
suitable templates has greatly limited the size of macrocycles accessible.
To this end, Vernier effects were exploited to direct synthesis of
large nanorings using multiple smaller templates.[17] Vernier templating not only proves to be a powerful new
strategy to construct large nanorings, but also renders shape-persistent
structures with diverse geometries.[18] Exciton
delocalization and emission depolarization processes are expected
to be strongly affected by the change of geometry in the structures.[19]Conformational effects on photophysical
properties have been examined
extensively using both experimental[20,21] and theoretical
methods[22] on a variety of conjugated polymer
systems, such as PPV,[23,24] P3HT,[25,26] and dendrimers.[27] In particular, effects
on polarization memory loss[18,23] and energy transfer[28,29] have attracted much attention.At the center of our study,
we address the question of how deliberate
distortion of a molecular nanoring influences the emissive properties
of a molecule following excitation. We examine to what extent out-of-plane
distortions of a particular nanoring topology affect the polarization
memory of the transition dipole moment and whether such effects can
be predicted by molecular mechanics simulations. In search for answers
to these questions, a range of conjugated zinc porphyrin nanorings
of similar size but different conformations are examined using ultrafast
time-resolved spectroscopy and the results are compared to molecular
dynamics simulations of ring structures.
Experimental Section
Materials
The synthesis and characterization of the
nanoring templates and complexes are described in detail elsewhere.[15,17,30−32] Figure 1 introduces the porphyrin nanorings under investigation,
which comprise porphyrin units joined by butadiyne bridges. Through
insertion of templates binding to the porphyrin units, a range of
different molecular shapes are created with spatial extent on the
nanometer scale. Untemplated nanorings and only differ slightly in
ring diameter and have almost identical conformation and absorption/emission
spectra (further information in the Supporting
Information (SI)). Both samples are prepared in toluene/1%
pyridine solution to prevent aggregation. Templating changes the geometry
considerably by rigidifying the nanoring into two smaller porphyrin
“loops” and introducing significant out-of-plane distortions,
such as bending and twisting. Molecular mechanics simulations (vide
infra) show that ·(T5) and ·(T6) have similar structures,
with the main difference being in the shape of templates as shown
in Figure 1b,c. The angle between the mean
template planes in ·(T5) is calculated to be θ
= 72°. The twist in ·(T6) is even more pronounced and
has the form of a figure-of-eight, with θ = 28°, as shown
from crystal structure data in a previous study.[17] On the other hand, ·(T8) is planar and not expected to
exhibit any substantial twist. These conformations have been deduced
from molecular mechanics and dynamics simulation using HyperChem, which will be described later in detail. Samples with template
complexes were prepared in pure toluene solution, as the templates
would otherwise be displaced by competition with pyridine.
Figure 1
Chemical structures
of the budadiyne-linked zinc porphyrin nanoring
assemblies under investigation: (a) , (b) ·(T5), (c) ·(T6), (d) , (e) ·(T6), and (f) ·(T8). Templates are indicated
in blue, and zinc atoms are denoted in red. All compounds have octyloxy
side chains (Ar) which are omitted in the graphic for clarity.
Chemical structures
of the budadiyne-linked zinc porphyrin nanoring
assemblies under investigation: (a) , (b) ·(T5), (c) ·(T6), (d) , (e) ·(T6), and (f) ·(T8). Templates are indicated
in blue, and zinc atoms are denoted in red. All compounds have octyloxy
side chains (Ar) which are omitted in the graphic for clarity.
Time-Resolved Photoluminescence
Spectroscopy
The photoluminescence
(PL) upconversion technique was engaged to investigate PL dynamics
of sample solutions held in quartz cuvettes as described in detail
elsewhere.[18,33] An excitation pulse was generated
by a mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser with pulse duration of 100 fs and
a repetition rate of 80 MHz. PL is collected and optically gated in
a beta-barium-oxide (BBO) crystal by a vertically polarized time-delayed
gate beam. The upconverted signal, which consists of sum-frequency
photons from the gate pulse and the vertical component of the PL,
was collected, dispersed in a monochromator, and detected using a
nitrogen-cooled CCD. Using a combination of a half-wave plate and
a Glan-Thompson polarizer, the polarization of the excitation pulse
was varied and PL intensity dynamics were recorded separately for
components polarized parallel (I∥) and perpendicular (I⊥) to the
excitation pulse polarization. The PL anisotropy is defined using
γ = (I∥ – I⊥) /(I∥ + 2I⊥) and calculated from the
measured components. The full-width-half-maximum (FWHM) of the instrumental
response function (IRF) was
measured to be ∼270 fs, which gives the time-resolution limit
of the system (further details in the SI). By recording the IRF with both polarizations, a temporal shift
of ∼15 fs between I∥ and I⊥was found, and thus, the calculation
of γ(t) was adjusted accordingly (further information
in the SI).[34]To investigate PL decay dynamics at longer delay time after
excitation (>1 ns), electronic gating through time-correlated single-photon
counting (TCSPC) technique was explored, using a Becker & Hickl
module. Here, emission was detected with a silicon single-photon avalanche
diode, yielding a temporal resolution of around 40 ps. By fitting
the experimental data to a single exponential decay model IPL = A exp(−t/τ), the lifetime τ of the excitation was extracted.Steady-state absorption and time-integrated PL spectra at room
temperature were recorded using a PerkinElmer Lambda 1050 UV/Vis/NIR
spectrometer and a Horiba FluoroLog fluorimeter, respectively.
Results
and Discussion
Absorption and Emission Spectra
In order to gain basic
insight about the photophysical and electronic properties of the nanorings,
steady state absorption and emission spectroscopy was performed. The
resulting spectra for and ·(T6) are compared in Figure 2; spectra for
further structures are provided in the SI. Zinc porphyrin monomers exhibit a strong S0 →
S2 transition at ∼400 nm (Soret band) and a weaker
S0 → S1 transition at ∼550 nm
(Q-band).[35] For the nanorings, π-conjugation
extends through the butadiyne bridges, lifting the degeneracy in both
the lowest-energy Q band and Soret band of the porphyrin
monomers. Transitions polarized parallel (Q) and perpendicular (Q) to the acetylenic backbone can therefore be observed
(see Figure 2). When the nanorings bind to
the templates, Q is
observed to be red-shifted with respect to the Soret band, while Q shows no considerable change.
In addition, a significant sharpening of features in both emission
and absorption spectra can be observed for the templated complexes.
Templates bring rigidity to the system; the molecules are less prone
to interporphyrin torsional motions and the molecular backbone may
be planarized,[18] resulting in the observed
red shift of Q. The
four templated nanorings hence exhibit similar spectral features (see
also further spectra in the SI).
Figure 2
Normalized
steady-state absorption (blue lines) and time-integrated
photoluminescence (green lines) spectra at 295 K for (a) in toluene/1% pyridine and (b) ·(T6) in toluene solution. The emission spectra were recorded after excitation
at 520 nm (into the Soret band). The Q and Q transitions are indicated by red arrows.
Normalized
steady-state absorption (blue lines) and time-integrated
photoluminescence (green lines) spectra at 295 K for (a) in toluene/1% pyridine and (b) ·(T6) in toluene solution. The emission spectra were recorded after excitation
at 520 nm (into the Soret band). The Q and Q transitions are indicated by red arrows.
Photoluminescence Intensity and Polarization Anisotropy Dynamics
PL upconversion under ambient condition was performed to reveal
the extent of emission depolarization following photoexcitation with
a linearly polarized laser pulse. The templated nanorings were excited
at 820 nm and the untemplated rings at 760 nm, with emission being
monitored at the peak wavelength for each nanoring. To avoid PL quenching
via exciton–exciton annihilation,[36] the excitation fluence was kept low (0.08 μJ cm–2). Figure 3 depicts the time-dependent PL
of and ·(T6) over
the first 15 ps after excitation with a pulse polarized either parallel
(I∥) or perpendicular (I⊥) to the polarization of the detected
emission. Corresponding data for all investigated molecules are given
in the SI. For , the PL intensity remains constant over the experiment
time window after the onset of the signal at t =
0, whereas ·(T6) shows a slight decaying trend, in agreement
with the shorter lifetime obtained using TCSPC (shown in Table 1).
Figure 3
Time-resolved PL dynamics of (a) in toluene/1% pyridine (concentration 0.2 mM) and (b) ·(T6) in toluene solution (concentration 0.4 mM). Samples were excited
by excitation pulse polarized either parallel (blue dots) or perpendicular
(red dots) to the detection polarization, as illustrated in the inset.
Table 1
Experimentally Obtained PL Lifetimes
τ and Anisotropy γ Values for All Nanorings under Investigation,
as Well as the Root-Mean-Squared Values of the Distortion angles α
(Twisting) and β (Bending) Obtained for the Templated Rings
from Molecular Dynamics Simulation using HyperChema
molecule
τ ± 5% (ps)
γ ± 0.02
γs
(⟨α 2⟩)1/2
(⟨β 2⟩)1/2
c-P10
683
0.11
0.10
–
–
c-P12
792
0.10
0.10
–
–
c-P10·(T5)2
471
0.05
0.03
68°
54°
c-P10·(T6)2
463
0.05
0.03
60°
62°
c-P12·(T6)2
448
0.04
0.06
24°
44°
c-P12·(T8)2
543
0.07
0.08
27°
14°
Using a simplified model based
on the results from HyperChem as described in the
main text, simulated anisotropy values γs are given.
Time-resolved PL dynamics of (a) in toluene/1% pyridine (concentration 0.2 mM) and (b) ·(T6) in toluene solution (concentration 0.4 mM). Samples were excited
by excitation pulse polarized either parallel (blue dots) or perpendicular
(red dots) to the detection polarization, as illustrated in the inset.Selective excitation near the Q band of a rigid butadiyne-bridged
porphyrin oligomer is expected
to result in an excited state with a transition dipole moment along
the molecular backbone.[18] In the absence
of any depolarization mechanisms, emission will occur in the same
polarization direction as the absorption, and for a randomly oriented
distribution of such molecules in solution, an initial anisotropy
value of 0.4 is expected.[37,38] However, for a complete
depolarization of the transition dipole moment within the 2D plane,
as may be the case for the untemplated rings, a PL anisotropy value
of 0.1 should be found.[37,38] Other effects, such
as out-of-plane distortion, could further lower the value toward zero.[38]Figure 4 shows
the temporal dependence of
the anisotropy γ(t) for a number of the investigated
nanoring topologies. Data for the remaining structures are provided
in the SI. For all nanoring topologies
investigated, the anisotropy is found to be static over the first
20 ps after excitation, within the temporal resolution of 270 fs.
These dynamics were recorded for excitation near the middle of the Q band. It is possible that
excitation near the band edge (∼900 nm) may lead to creation
of localized states that have higher anisotropy and/or slower PL depolarization;[19] however, we are unable to probe such effects
here. These transients therefore indicate that while an initial ultrafast
depolarization process may occur within the first hundred femtoseconds
after excitation, slower effects such as molecular reorientation are
absent over these time scales.[18] The values
extracted in this way for the initial PL anisotropy γ are listed
in Table 1 for all molecules investigated.
These values have been independently determined multiple times at
5 ps after excitation, and an overall accuracy of ±0.02 was achieved.
The untemplated rings and display anisotropy values around 0.1,
as expected for a complete memory loss in the 2D plane and in the
absence of significant out-of-plane distortions of the rings.[19] For all templated rings on the other hand, a
significant reduction of γ below the value of 0.1 was observed.
Figure 4
PL polarization anisotropy
as a function of time after excitation
at 820 nm for (blue circles, detection
at 872 nm), ·(T8) (red triangles, detection at 904 nm), and ·(T6) (green squares, detection at 914 nm). The structures shown
on the right are energy minimized geometries calculated using a modified
form of MM+ force field in HyperChem. Side chains
are not shown in the diagram but were included in the simulations.
These results suggest that the excitation can access any segment
on the rings, both templated and untemplated, within the first few
hundred femtoseconds after excitation. Such dynamics may be accounted
for by either of two different mechanisms. In the first possible scenario,
excitons are initially fully delocalized over the entire ring in the
absorbing state,[18,39] but may subsequently self-localize
following geometric relaxation.[10,40−44] In the second scenario, the absorbing state is only delocalized
over a subset of monomers, but excitons are subject to ultrafast energy
migration along the ring within hundreds of femtoseconds and thus
beyond the time-resolution of the upconversion system, similar to
observations reported in LH2 antenna complexes.[45] It has recently been shown that as the size of untemplated
porphyrin nanorings increases, a shift from the former to the latter
scenario may gradually occur.[14,19]We find that
the measured anisotropy values below 0.1 for the templated
nanorings can be explained by the presence of significant out-of-plane
distortions. Molecular dynamics simulations discussed in detail below
show that the measured γ is closer to zero for nanoring topologies
with larger distortions. As illustrated in Figure 4, the rigid planar ·(T8) has an appreciably higher anisotropy
(γ = 0.07) than the other three templated nanorings which are
found to display significant out-of-plane distortions.PL polarization anisotropy
as a function of time after excitation
at 820 nm for (blue circles, detection
at 872 nm), ·(T8) (red triangles, detection at 904 nm), and ·(T6) (green squares, detection at 914 nm). The structures shown
on the right are energy minimized geometries calculated using a modified
form of MM+ force field in HyperChem. Side chains
are not shown in the diagram but were included in the simulations.
Molecular Dynamics and
PL Depolarization Simulation
To quantitatively examine the
distortions present in the different
nanoring topologies, molecular dynamics simulations were conducted
for the templated nanorings with side chains using HyperChem. The starting configurations were energy-minimized geometries (at
0 K) calculated using a modified form of HyperChem’s MM+ force field. Additional bond stretch, angle bend, and
torsion terms were added to describe metalloporphyrins,[46,47] alkynes,[48] and butadiynes.[49]Molecular dynamics simulation were conducted
assuming ambient vacuum at two constant temperatures, 300 and 600
K. Simulations ran in time steps of 1 fs for a time window of 500
ps, which gave a representative average. Since the templates are fairly
rigid, it can be assumed that distortions mainly originate from motions
between two template planes where two fundamental motions can be distinguished:
twisting and bending, as illustrated in Figure 5a,b for the case of 300 K. Corresponding results for 600 K are shown
in the SI. The corresponding angles α
and β are introduced in the figure to quantitatively describe
the deviation of the structure from a planar conformation. All starting
configurations hold β(0) ∼ 0°. The distortion angles
of the conformations in the 500 ps simulation window are plotted as
a histogram, and the results are summarized in Figure 5c–f, with the root-mean-square (RMS) values listed
in Table 1. Due to the nature of the simulations
and the ambiguity in defining the distortion angles, these results
only provide a good estimate of the overall trend. It is remarkable
that, compared to the bending angle β, the spread in the twisting
angle α is generally much narrower and the RMS remains closer
to the energetically optimized values, which indicates that, in the
molecular dynamics, thermal energy has a greater influence on the
bending motion than the twisting motion. ·(T5) and ·(T6) show large out-of-plane distortions in twisting (around 65°)
as well as bending motion at 300 K, consistent with the experimentally
observed low PL anisotropy values of γ = 0.05. ·(T6) and ·(T8) both show similar distributions in α around
∼25°, much lower than that for the templated topologies in comparison and in good agreement
with structures obtained from crytallographic investigations.[17] These simulations explain the only slight decrease
in γ from 0.1 to 0.07 experimentally observed for ·(T8). However, ·(T6) has a much lower PL anisotropy, which can
be accounted for by its large bending angle similar to ·(T5) and ·(T6). In contrast, ·(T8) remains rigid: β
is narrowly distributed around the planar starting conformation.
Figure 5
(a,b) Definition of the
distortion angles. (a) The twisting angle
α between two template planes is defined using ·(T6) as an example. Four atoms on the porphyrin ring (red) are chosen
to form three vectors a⃗ , b⃗ , and c⃗, with a⃗ and c⃗ lying approximately parallel to each
other when the molecule does not exhibit any twist. α is the
torsional angle defined by the four atoms and is the angle between
the planes formed by a⃗, b⃗ and b⃗, c⃗. α
represents the twisting angle from a planar position. (b) The bending
angle β is illustrated using ·(T8) as an example. Four
atoms (red) are chosen as shown. Two angles ϕ and δ are
calculated, where β = ϕ + δ describes the deviation
from a planar position. Simulations were carried out with octyloxy
side chains, which are omitted in the diagram for clarity. (c–f)
Area normalized histogram of twisting angle α (blue) and bending
angle β (red) for (c) ·(T5), (d) ·(T6), (e) ·(T6), (f) ·(T8). Molecular dynamics simulation carried
out using HyperChem at 300 K for 500 ps, as described
in detail in the text.
In summary, the molecular dynamics simulations reveal that the
templates provide an effective means to control the nanoring structure,
as can be seen in the narrow distribution in Figure 5c–f as well as in the close resemblance between RMS
values at 300 K and the energetically optimized values at 0 K for
all nanorings. Furthermore, a good correspondence is evident between
simulated conformations and measured PL anisotropy: the more pronounced
the out-of-plane distortions in both twisting and bending motions,
the further the anisotropy is found to be lowered from 0.1.Using a simplified model based
on the results from HyperChem as described in the
main text, simulated anisotropy values γs are given.To link the value experimentally
obtained for the PL anisotropy
with the calculated molecular structures, simple simulations were
performed using a distributed point-dipole model.[38,50,51] The porphyrin units in each nanoring are
assumed to be arranged in two smaller circles around each template
as a result of the template’s rigidity, with their transition
dipole moments aligned along the molecular backbone, as shown in the
schematic in the SI. The angle between
the two template planes in the calculation is taken to be the RMS
values simulated by HyperChem at 300 K. Corresponding
values for 600 K are given in the SI and
exhibit similar trends. For simplicity, the emitting and absorbing
states are assumed to extend over one monomer unit. This approximation
seems sensible as the PL depolarization dynamics are observed to be
sufficiently fast (<300 fs) to suggest that all sites are visited
with similar probability. Therefore, the calculated average based
on contributions from individual monomers will yield representative
results, independent of the extent of exciton wave function delocalization.
The polarization anisotropy is then calculated using[38]with the only parameter being κ, the
angle between absorbing and emitting dipole moments. Excitation can
access any segment of a nanoring, and so each monomer can act as absorbing
or emitting site with equal probability. Therefore, angles between
dipoles of any two porphyrin monomers on the rings are considered
and the average of γ is calculated according to eq 1. Even though this model is rather simplified and primarily
focuses on the effect of bending and twisting distortions on the PL
anisotropy, the results agree well with the experimental findings.
The calculated anisotropy results γs are listed in
Table 1 and lie within the error range of the
experimental values. This correspondence confirms that the out-of-plane
distortion is in fact the major contribution causing the lowered anisotropy
value from 0.1. The modeled values tend to be slightly lower than
the experimental values, but are surprisingly close, given the simplicity
of the model. Deviations between experimental and simulated values
may arise because simulations were carried out assuming vacuum conditions
(screening of intermolecular interactions arising from the solvent
was not taken into account) and because of some variation with the
molecular mechanics potential chosen. In addition, a more complete
description of exciton depolarization dynamics ought to include effects
such as exciton localization dynamics,[41] for example, to sites that are preferred through specific local
geometries. However, the good agreement between the experimental results
and the simple simulation performed here ultimately results from the
intimate link between the topology of the molecule to the polarization
directions its emitting state can explore.(a,b) Definition of the
distortion angles. (a) The twisting angle
α between two template planes is defined using ·(T6) as an example. Four atoms on the porphyrin ring (red) are chosen
to form three vectors a⃗ , b⃗ , and c⃗, with a⃗ and c⃗ lying approximately parallel to each
other when the molecule does not exhibit any twist. α is the
torsional angle defined by the four atoms and is the angle between
the planes formed by a⃗, b⃗ and b⃗, c⃗. α
represents the twisting angle from a planar position. (b) The bending
angle β is illustrated using ·(T8) as an example. Four
atoms (red) are chosen as shown. Two angles ϕ and δ are
calculated, where β = ϕ + δ describes the deviation
from a planar position. Simulations were carried out with octyloxy
side chains, which are omitted in the diagram for clarity. (c–f)
Area normalized histogram of twisting angle α (blue) and bending
angle β (red) for (c) ·(T5), (d) ·(T6), (e) ·(T6), (f) ·(T8). Molecular dynamics simulation carried
out using HyperChem at 300 K for 500 ps, as described
in detail in the text.
Conclusion
π-Conjugated nanorings containing
10 or 12 porphyrin units
have been investigated to explore the influence of molecular topology
on exciton dynamics and polarization memory loss. It is found that
excitations can access any part of the templated nanorings, despite
their twisted conformations, thus showing similar exciton dynamics
to their more planar untemplated counterparts. Time-dependent ultrafast
spectroscopy reveals that all nanorings exhibit static PL anisotropy
transients within the first 20 ps after excitation, but with an anisotropy
much lower than the value of 0.1 found for untemplated rings. Molecular
dynamics simulations show that this phenomenon can be fully explained
and well described by the out-of-plane distortions of the rings from
a planar conformation. Numerical simulations of the PL anisotropy
taking into account such distortions yield values that correlate well
with the experimentally obtained results. In summary, template-directed
synthesis not only plays a vital role in the synthesis of large porphyrin
rings, but it also rigidifies the nanorings and introduces a means
to control their geometric structures while maintaining excellent
π-conjugation. These findings open exciting new possibilities
for fast and directional energy transfer in nanoscale molecular structures.
Authors: Neil A Montgomery; Gordon J Hedley; Arvydas Ruseckas; Jean-Christophe Denis; Stefan Schumacher; Alexander L Kanibolotsky; Peter J Skabara; Ian Galbraith; Graham A Turnbull; Ifor D W Samuel Journal: Phys Chem Chem Phys Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 3.676
Authors: D Beljonne; E Hennebicq; C Daniel; L M Herz; C Silva; G D Scholes; F J M Hoeben; P Jonkheijm; A P H J Schenning; S C J Meskers; R T Phillips; R H Friend; E W Meijer Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2005-06-02 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Markus Hoffmann; Joakim Kärnbratt; Ming-Hua Chang; Laura M Herz; Bo Albinsson; Harry L Anderson Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2008 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Lyudmyla Adamska; Iffat Nayyar; Hang Chen; Anna K Swan; Nicolas Oldani; Sebastian Fernandez-Alberti; Matthew R Golder; Ramesh Jasti; Stephen K Doorn; Sergei Tretiak Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2014-10-17 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Takuji Adachi; Girish Lakhwani; Matthew C Traub; Robert J Ono; Christopher W Bielawski; Paul F Barbara; David A Vanden Bout Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Shiqi Liu; Dmitry V Kondratuk; Sophie A L Rousseaux; Guzmán Gil-Ramírez; Melanie C O'Sullivan; Jonathan Cremers; Tim D W Claridge; Harry L Anderson Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Dmitry V Kondratuk; Johannes K Sprafke; Melanie C O'Sullivan; Luis M A Perdigao; Alex Saywell; Marc Malfois; James N O'Shea; Peter H Beton; Amber L Thompson; Harry L Anderson Journal: Chemistry Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Ludovic Favereau; Arjen Cnossen; Julien B Kelber; Juliane Q Gong; René M Oetterli; Jonathan Cremers; Laura M Herz; Harry L Anderson Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 15.419