| Literature DB >> 25960773 |
Giovanni Mario Pes1, Alessandro Palmerio Delitala1, Giuseppe Delitala1, Alessandra Errigo1, Salvatore Costantino1, Giuseppe Fanciulli1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In patients with Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA) a lower body mass index was reported compared with classical type 2 diabetes (T2D), and was found to be associated with a faster progression to insulin-dependence. In this study we determined the body composition in a cohort of LADA patients from Sardinia, Italy, and compared it with age- and gender-matched patients diagnosed as having adult-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) and non-autoimmune T2D.Entities:
Keywords: Body composition; Insulin dependence; Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults
Year: 2014 PMID: 25960773 PMCID: PMC4424588 DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-6-128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Clinical characteristics of study participants
| Variables | LADA | GADAb-negative T2D | Adult-onset T1D | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 210 | 210 | 30 | |
|
| 92:118 | 92:118 | 11:19 | n.s.§; n.s.# |
|
| 55.1 ± 10.6 | 57.7 ± 10.1 | 46.6 ± 7.9 | n.s.§; <0.0001# |
|
| 28.1 ± 5.3 | 30.8 ± 6.1 | 25.0 ± 3.5 | <0.0001§; 0.0002# |
|
| 95.2 ± 10.0 | 101.1 ± 12.1 | 86.3 ± 10.6 | <0.0001§; 0.0002# |
|
| 88 (42%) | 182 (87%) | 3 (10%) | <0.0001§; 0.0008# |
§LADA vs T2D; #LADA vs adult–onset T1D.
Whole body composition in LADA, T2D and adult-onset T1D patients
| Variables | Gender | LADA | GADab-negative T2D | Adult-onset T1D | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fat mass (%) | M | 21.6 ± 4.7 | 27.2 ± 5.9 | 21.3 ± 4.9 | <0.0001§ ; n.s.# |
| F | 33.8 ± 5.5 | 37.1 ± 6.1 | 30.3 ± 6.8 | 0.0001§; n.s.# | |
| Lean body mass (%) | M | 75.2 ± 4.5 | 70.4 ± 6.5 | 75.6 ± 4.8 | <0.0001§; n.s. # |
| F | 63.5 ± 5.3 | 59.7 ± 6.9 | 66.8 ± 6.6 | <0.0001§; n.s.# |
§LADA vs T2D; #LADA vs adult–onset T1D.
Segmental body composition in LADA patients and control groups
| Variables | Gender | LADA | GADab-negative T2D | Adult-onset T1D | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper limbs FM (%) | M | 21.5 ± 5.3 | 29.7 ± 10.6 | 21.6 ± 5.8 | <0.0001§ ; n.s. |
| F | 40.9 ± 6.9 | 31.2 ± 10.4 | 37.3 ± 11.8 | <0.0001§ ; n.s. | |
| Upper limbs LBM (%) | M | 73.9 ± 5.3 | 66.4 ± 10.5 | 74.0 ± 5.6 | <0.0001§ ; n.s. |
| F | 55.3 ± 6.8 | 64.9 ± 10.3 | 58.7 ± 11.3 | <0.0001§ ; n.s. | |
| Trunk FM (%) | M | 21.0 ± 6.0 | 24.5 ± 6.5 | 20.0 ± 6.4 | 0.0002§ ; n.s. |
| F | 30.8 ± 8.0 | 38.1 ± 7.8 | 25.5 ± 6.8 | <0.0001§ ; 0.005#. | |
| Trunk LBM(%) | M | 78.0 ± 6.0 | 74.8 ± 6.5 | 79.2 ± 6.4 | 0.0006§; n.s. |
| F | 68.5 ± 8.0 | 58.0 ± 7.8 | 73.8 ± 6.7 | <0.0001§ ; 0.004#. | |
| Lower limbs FM (%) | M | 22.0 ± 4.4 | 27.0 ± 4.0 | 23.2 ± 4.8 | <0.0001§; n.s. |
| F | 38.9 ± 5.3 | 28.5 ± 8.3 | 38.7 ± 9.2 | <0.0001§ ; n.s. | |
| Lower limbs LBM (%) | M | 73.8 ± 4.3 | 69.5 ± 4.0 | 73.0 ± 4.8 | <0.0001§; n.s. |
| F | 57.9 ± 5.2 | 67.6 ± 8.4 | 58.3 ± 9.0 | <0.0001§; n.s. |
§LADA vs T1D; #LADA vs T2D.