BACKGROUND: Sensitive and accurate methods to detect hematopoietic chimerism after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are essential to evaluate engraftment and to monitor response to therapeutic procedures such as donor lymphocyte infusion. Continuous long-term follow up, however, requires large amounts of pre-HSCT samples limiting the application of many widely used techniques for sensitive chimerism monitoring. METHODS: DNAs from 42 normal healthy donors and 16 HSCT donor/recipient pairs were employed to validate the use of allele-specific insertion/deletion (indel) quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to quantify chimerism in samples with low amounts of DNA. Consequently, indel-qPCR analyses of samples from 16 HSCT patients were compared to short-tandem repeat (STR) specific PCR analyses. RESULTS: Typing with reduced amounts of input DNA (15 vs. 60 ng) allowed for the reliable distinction of positive (mean threshold cycle (ct) 28.05) and negative (ct >36) signals. The high informativity of primer/probe sets, with 12 out of 19 markers exceeding 20% informativity, was confirmed in our cohort (n = 74). Importantly, a fourfold reduction of input DNA compared to published protocols did not alter PCR efficiencies and allowed for a more sensitive detection of chimerism in 7 of 16 HSCT patients compared to results obtained by STR-PCR. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that indel-qPCR is a more sensitive technique for the detection of hematopoietic chimerism compared to STR-PCR and works efficiently for samples with low amounts of DNA.
BACKGROUND: Sensitive and accurate methods to detect hematopoietic chimerism after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are essential to evaluate engraftment and to monitor response to therapeutic procedures such as donor lymphocyte infusion. Continuous long-term follow up, however, requires large amounts of pre-HSCT samples limiting the application of many widely used techniques for sensitive chimerism monitoring. METHODS: DNAs from 42 normal healthy donors and 16 HSCT donor/recipient pairs were employed to validate the use of allele-specific insertion/deletion (indel) quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) to quantify chimerism in samples with low amounts of DNA. Consequently, indel-qPCR analyses of samples from 16 HSCT patients were compared to short-tandem repeat (STR) specific PCR analyses. RESULTS: Typing with reduced amounts of input DNA (15 vs. 60 ng) allowed for the reliable distinction of positive (mean threshold cycle (ct) 28.05) and negative (ct >36) signals. The high informativity of primer/probe sets, with 12 out of 19 markers exceeding 20% informativity, was confirmed in our cohort (n = 74). Importantly, a fourfold reduction of input DNA compared to published protocols did not alter PCR efficiencies and allowed for a more sensitive detection of chimerism in 7 of 16 HSCT patients compared to results obtained by STR-PCR. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that indel-qPCR is a more sensitive technique for the detection of hematopoietic chimerism compared to STR-PCR and works efficiently for samples with low amounts of DNA.
Authors: O Horky; J Mayer; L Kablaskova; F Razga; M Krejci; J Kissova; M Borsky; I Jeziskova; D Dvorakova Journal: Int J Lab Hematol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.877
Authors: M R Baer; C C Stewart; R K Dodge; G Leget; N Sulé; K Mrózek; C A Schiffer; B L Powell; J E Kolitz; J O Moore; R M Stone; F R Davey; A J Carroll; R A Larson; C D Bloomfield Journal: Blood Date: 2001-06-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Manuel Barrios; Antonio Jiménez-Velasco; José Román-Gómez; María Elena Madrigal; Juan Antonio Castillejo; Antonio Torres; Anabel Heiniger Journal: Haematologica Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Ephraim P Hochberg; David B Miklos; Donna Neuberg; Daniel A Eichner; Stephen F McLaughlin; Alex Mattes-Ritz; Edwin P Alyea; Joseph H Antin; Robert J Soiffer; Jerome Ritz Journal: Blood Date: 2002-08-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: D C Roy; R Tantravahi; C Murray; K Dear; B Gorgone; K C Anderson; A S Freedman; L M Nadler; J Ritz Journal: Blood Date: 1990-01-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Jennifer Valero-Garcia; María Del Carmen González-Espinosa; Manuel Barrios; Greta Carmona-Antoñanzas; Javier García-Planells; Carlos Ruiz-Lafora; Ainhoa Fuentes-Gálvez; Antonio Jiménez-Velasco Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hajnalka Andrikovics; Zoltán Őrfi; Nóra Meggyesi; András Bors; Lívia Varga; Petra Kövy; Zsófia Vilimszky; Fanni Kolics; László Gopcsa; Péter Reményi; Attila Tordai Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-09-10 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Almudena Navarro-Bailón; Diego Carbonell; Asunción Escudero; María Chicano; Paula Muñiz; Julia Suárez-González; Rebeca Bailén; Gillen Oarbeascoa; Mi Kwon; José Luis Díez-Martín; Carolina Martínez-Laperche; Ismael Buño Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 4.096