Literature DB >> 25960395

Responses to a Decision Aid on Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practices.

Michael J Barry1, Richard M Wexler2, Charles D Brackett3, Karen R Sepucha4, Leigh H Simmons4, Bethany S Gerstein2, Vickie L Stringfellow2, Floyd J Fowler2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing remains controversial, with most guidelines recommending shared decision making. This study describes men's PSA screening preferences before and after viewing a decision aid and relates these preferences to subsequent clinician visit content.
METHODS: Men were recruited from two health systems in 2009-2013. Participants answered a questionnaire before and after decision aid viewing addressing PSA screening preferences and five basic knowledge questions. At one health system, participants also answered a survey after a subsequent clinician visit. Data were analyzed in 2014.
RESULTS: One thousand forty-one predominantly white, well-educated men responded to the pre- and post-viewing questionnaire (25% and 29% response rates at the two sites). After viewing, the proportion of patients leaning away from PSA screening increased significantly (p<0.001), with 386 (38%) leaning toward PSA screening versus 436 (43%) before viewing; 174 (17%) unsure versus 319 (32%) before; and 448 (44%) leaning away versus 253 (25%) before. Higher knowledge scores were associated with being more likely to lean against screening and less likely to be unsure (p<0.001). Among 278 men who also completed a questionnaire after a subsequent clinician visit, participants who planned to discuss PSA screening with their clinicians were significantly more likely to report such discussions than participants who did not (148/217 [68%] vs 16/46 [35%], respectively [p<0.001]).
CONCLUSIONS: A decision aid reduces men's interest in PSA screening, particularly among the initially unsure. Men who plan to discuss PSA screening with their clinician after a decision aid are more likely to do so.
Copyright © 2015 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25960395     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cancer Screening in the Elderly: A Review of Breast, Colorectal, Lung, and Prostate Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 2.  What's new in screening in 2015?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

3.  Are We Choosing Wisely? Older Adults' Cancer Screening Intentions and Recalled Discussions with Physicians About Stopping.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Louise C Walter; Sei J Lee; William Dale
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilya Ivlev; Silvie Jerabkova; Meenakshi Mishra; Lily A Cook; Karen B Eden
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Does greater patient involvement in healthcare decision-making affect malpractice complaints? A large case vignette survey.

Authors:  Søren Birkeland; Marie Bismark; Michael J Barry; Sören Möller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Capsule Commentary on Ivlev et al., Use of Patient Decision Aids Increased Younger Women's Reluctance to Begin Screening Mammography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Amir Mohammad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Assessing Preference Shift and Effects on Patient Knowledge and Decisional Conflict: Cross-Sectional Study of an Interactive Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Patient Decision Aid.

Authors:  Peter Scalia; Glyn Elwyn; Jan Kremer; Marjan Faber; Marie-Anne Durand
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2018-11-21

8.  Incidence of prostate cancer among patients with prostate-related urinary symptoms: A single institution series in 10 years.

Authors:  Khalid M Alotaibi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

9.  Sociodemographic Representativeness in a Nationwide Web-Based Survey of the View of Men on Involvement in Health Care Decision-Making: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Søren F Birkeland; Anders K Haakonsson; Susanne S Pedersen; Nina Rottmann; Michael J Barry; Sören Möller
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Who and when should we screen for prostate cancer? Interviews with key opinion leaders.

Authors:  Sigrid Carlsson; Michael Leapman; Peter Carroll; Fritz Schröder; Peter C Albertsen; Dragan Ilic; Michael Barry; Dominick L Frosch; Andrew Vickers
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 8.775

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.