Literature DB >> 25959890

[Bibliometrics and web use: the birth of altmetrics].

Valeria Scotti.   

Abstract

Counting citations that a research article received by other articles was the traditional bibliometric method for the evaluation of a scientific research. Citations have been used both to evaluate a scientific paper - usually in conjunction with the peer review methods - and to determine the quality of a scientific research output. The development of tools even more Web 2.0 oriented has profoundly changed the scientific communication process. In this context, many web tools have emerged including the so-called "social media" (e-i., Facebook, Twitter). Hence the need for new indicators to measure the influence of these tools on the scientific community and the emergence of alternative metrics. Altmetrics combines the traditional bibliometrics tool with the use of the web. Formulated with the purpose to measure new aspects of scientific production, these new metrics are placed in order to complement and supplement the existing indicators rather than act as their replacements.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25959890     DOI: 10.1701/1830.20030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Recenti Prog Med        ISSN: 0034-1193


  2 in total

Review 1.  What Does the Future Hold for Scientific Journals? Visual Abstracts and Other Tools for Communicating Research.

Authors:  Vahagn C Nikolian; Andrew M Ibrahim
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

2.  Does a research group increase impact on the scientific community or general public discussion? Alternative metric-based evaluation.

Authors:  Manuela De Gregori; Valeria Scotti; Annalisa De Silvestri; Moreno Curti; Guido Fanelli; Massimo Allegri; Michael E Schatman
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 3.133

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.