| Literature DB >> 25959679 |
Antoine Roux1,2, Laurence Beaumont-Azuar1, Abdul Monem Hamid1, Sandra De Miranda1, Dominique Grenet1, Guillaume Briend1,3, Pierre Bonnette4, Philippe Puyo4, François Parquin5, Jerome Devaquet6, Gregoire Trebbia6, Elise Cuquemelle5, Benoit Douvry1, Clément Picard1, Morgan Le Guen7, Alain Chapelier4, Marc Stern1, Edouard Sage4.
Abstract
Many candidates for lung transplantation (LT) die on the waiting list, raising the question of graft availability and strategy for organ allocation. We report the experience of the new organ allocation program, "High Emergency Lung Transplantation" (HELT), since its implementation in our center in 2007. Retrospective analysis of 201 lung transplant patients, of whom 37 received HELT from 1st July 2007 to 31th May 2012. HELT candidates had a higher impairment grade on respiratory status and higher Lung Allocation Score (LAS). HELT patients had increased incidence of perioperative complications (e.g., perioperative bleeding) and extracorporeal circulatory assistance (75% vs. 36.6%, P = 0.0005). No significant difference was observed between HELT and non-HELT patients in mechanical ventilation duration (15.5 days vs. 11 days, P = 0.27), intensive care unit length of stay (15 days vs. 10 days, P = 0.22) or survival rate at 12 (81% vs. 80%), and 24 months post-LT (72.9% vs. 75.0%). Lastly, mortality on the waiting list was spectacularly reduced from 19% to 2% when compared to the non-HELT 2004-2007 group. Despite a more severe clinical status of patients on the waiting list, HELT provided similar results to conventional LT. These results were associated with a dramatic reduction in the mortality rate of patients on the waiting list.Entities:
Keywords: graft allocation; lung transplantation; mortality on waiting list
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25959679 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12604
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transpl Int ISSN: 0934-0874 Impact factor: 3.782