Literature DB >> 25959611

NOW vs LATER brain circuits: implications for obesity and addiction.

Nora D Volkow1, Ruben D Baler2.   

Abstract

Balancing behaviors that provide a reward NOW versus behaviors that provide an advantage LATER is critical for survival. We propose a model in which dopamine (DA) can favor NOW processes through phasic signaling in reward circuits or LATER processes through tonic signaling in control circuits. At the same time, through its modulation of the orbitofrontal cortex, which processes salience attribution, DA also enables shifting from NOW to LATER, while its modulation of the insula, which processes interoceptive information, influences the probability of selecting NOW vs LATER actions on the basis of an individual's physiological state. Disruptions along these circuits contribute to diverse pathologies, including obesity and addiction. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delay discounting; dopamine; intertemporal trade-off; striatum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25959611     DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2015.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Neurosci        ISSN: 0166-2236            Impact factor:   13.837


  76 in total

Review 1.  Hunger and BMI modulate neural responses to sweet stimuli: fMRI meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eunice Y Chen; Thomas A Zeffiro
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 2.  Neural circuitry and mechanisms of waiting impulsivity: relevance to addiction.

Authors:  Jeffrey W Dalley; Karen D Ersche
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Overweight adolescents' brain response to sweetened beverages mirrors addiction pathways.

Authors:  Sarah W Feldstein Ewing; Eric D Claus; Karen A Hudson; Francesca M Filbey; Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez; Krista M Lisdahl; Alberta S Kong
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.978

4.  Demand characteristics in episodic future thinking II: The role of cues and cue content in changing delay discounting.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Chemogenetic Activation of Midbrain Dopamine Neurons Affects Attention, but not Impulsivity, in the Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task in Rats.

Authors:  Linde Boekhoudt; Elisa S Voets; Jacques P Flores-Dourojeanni; Mieneke Cm Luijendijk; Louk Jmj Vanderschuren; Roger Ah Adan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Delay discounting as impaired valuation: Delayed rewards in an animal obesity model.

Authors:  David P Jarmolowicz; Jennifer L Hudnall; Luanne Hale; Stephen C Fowler; Marco Bortolato; Shea M Lemley; Michael J Sofis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 7.  Neurobiology of addiction: a neurocircuitry analysis.

Authors:  George F Koob; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 27.083

Review 8.  Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jillian M Rung; Gregory J Madden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-09

9.  The first day is always the hardest: Functional connectivity during cue exposure and the ability to resist smoking in the initial hours of a quit attempt.

Authors:  Shannon L Zelle; Kathleen M Gates; Julie A Fiez; Michael A Sayette; Stephen J Wilson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Amphetamine and morphine may produce acute-withdrawal related hypoactivity by initially activating a common dopamine pathway.

Authors:  Wesley White; Ilsun M White
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.