Literature DB >> 25959378

Protein profiles of Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus warneri are altered by photosensitization with cationic porphyrins.

Eliana Alves1, Ana Cristina Esteves, António Correia, Ângela Cunha, Maria A F Faustino, Maria G P M S Neves, Adelaide Almeida.   

Abstract

Oxidative stress induced by photodynamic treatment of microbial cells causes irreversible damages to vital cellular components such as proteins. Photodynamic inactivation (PDI) of bacteria, a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of superficial and localized skin and oral infections, can be achieved by exciting a photosensitizing agent with visible light in an oxygenated environment. Although some studies have addressed the oxidative alterations of PDI in bacterial proteins, the present study is the first to compare the electrophoretic profiles of proteins of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, having two structurally different porphyrins, with different kinetics of photoinactivation. The cationic porphyrins 5,10,15-tris(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)-20-(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin tri-iodide (Tri-Py(+)-Me-PF) and 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(1-methylpyridinium-4-yl)porphyrin tetra-iodide (Tetra-Py(+)-Me) were used to photosensitize Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus warneri upon white light irradiation at an irradiance of 4.0 mW cm(-2). After different photosensitization periods, proteins were extracted from bacteria and analyzed using one-dimensional SDS-PAGE. Apparent molecular weights and band intensities were determined after an irradiation period corresponding to a reduction of 4 log10 in cell viability. After photodynamic treatment, there was a general loss of bacterial proteins, assigned to large-scale protein degradation. Protein loss was more pronounced after PDI with Tri-Py(+)-Me-PF in both bacteria. There was also an increase in the concentration of some proteins as well as an increase in the molecular weight of other proteins. We show that proteins of E. coli and S. warneri are important targets of PDI. Although there is an attempt of cellular response to the PDI-induced damage by overexpression of a limited number of proteins, the damage is lethal. Our results show that changes occurring in the protein pattern during photodynamic treatment are different with the two photosensitizers, which helps to explain the different inactivation kinetics of the two bacteria. SDS-PAGE is a rational approach to assign the type of cellular response to stress that is being induced in the cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25959378     DOI: 10.1039/c4pp00194j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci        ISSN: 1474-905X            Impact factor:   3.982


  8 in total

1.  Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on the Virulence Factors of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Maria Bartolomeu; Sónia Rocha; Ângela Cunha; M G P M S Neves; Maria A F Faustino; Adelaide Almeida
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Factors Determining Staphylococcus aureus Susceptibility to Photoantimicrobial Chemotherapy: RsbU Activity, Staphyloxanthin Level, and Membrane Fluidity.

Authors:  Monika Kossakowska-Zwierucho; Rajmund Kaźmierkiewicz; Krzysztof P Bielawski; Joanna Nakonieczna
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Temperature Modulates the Secretome of the Phytopathogenic Fungus Lasiodiplodia theobromae.

Authors:  Carina Félix; Ana S Duarte; Rui Vitorino; Ana C L Guerreiro; Pedro Domingues; António C M Correia; Artur Alves; Ana C Esteves
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Characterization of blue light irradiation effects on pathogenic and nonpathogenic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Courtney M Abana; John R Brannon; Rebecca A Ebbott; Taryn L Dunigan; Kirsten R Guckes; Hubaida Fuseini; Jennifer Powers; Bridget R Rogers; Maria Hadjifrangiskou
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 5.  Blue Light Disinfection in Hospital Infection Control: Advantages, Drawbacks, and Pitfalls.

Authors:  João Cabral; Rodrigues Ag
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-07

6.  Photodynamic inactivation (PDI) as a promising alternative to current pharmaceuticals for the treatment of resistant microorganisms.

Authors:  Barbara Pucelik; Janusz M Dąbrowski
Journal:  Adv Inorg Chem       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 7.  Revisiting Current Photoactive Materials for Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Mariana Q Mesquita; Cristina J Dias; Maria G P M S Neves; Adelaide Almeida; M Amparo F Faustino
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Antimicrobial Photodynamic Approach in the Inactivation of Viruses in Wastewater: Influence of Alternative Adjuvants.

Authors:  Maria Bartolomeu; Cristiana Oliveira; Carla Pereira; M Graça P M S Neves; M Amparo F Faustino; Adelaide Almeida
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-24
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.