Literature DB >> 25958935

Female stickleback prefer shallow males: Sexual selection on nest microhabitat.

Daniel I Bolnick1,2, Kum Chuan Shim2, Chad D Brock2.   

Abstract

Sexual selection is most often thought of as acting on organismal traits, such as size or color. However, individuals' habitat use may also affect mating success. Here, we show that, in threespine stickleback, nest depth can be a target of sexual selection. In postglacial lakes in British Columbia, male threespine stickleback nest in a narrow range of depths. Prior studies revealed heritable variation in males' preferred nest microhabitat. We surveyed four natural populations, finding that male stickleback with shallower nests were more successful at breeding. Indeed, nest depth was a much stronger predictor of male mating success than more commonly studied targets of sexual selection in stickleback (size, condition, shape, color, infection status). This selection on nest depth means that variance in fitness changed predictably across microhabitats, altering the opportunity for sexual selection to act on other traits. Accordingly, we show that sexual selection on other male traits is strongest where variance in nesting success is highest (at intermediate nest depths in some lakes). We conclude that males' choice of nesting microhabitat is an especially important target of sexual selection, resulting in fine-scale spatial variation in sexual selection on other traits.
© 2015 The Author(s). Evolution © 2015 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Extended phenotype; Gasterosteus aculeatus; mate choice; microgeographic variation; opportunity for selection; threespine stickleback

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25958935     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12682

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Environmental change mediates mate choice for an extended phenotype, but not for mate quality.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Rebecca J Fox; Iain Barber
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Nest-site selection in a fish species with paternal care.

Authors:  Theo C M Bakker; Beat Mundwiler
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  Visual Background Choice and Light Environment Affect Male Guppy Visual Contrast.

Authors:  John A Endler; Dara-Marie Raggay; Solomon Maerowitz-McMahan; David N Reznick; Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-07

4.  Widespread positive but weak assortative mating by diet within stickleback populations.

Authors:  Travis Ingram; Yuexin Jiang; Racine Rangel; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.