Literature DB >> 25958293

Strategies for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping to enhance genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle: Comparison of commercially available SNP chips.

S A Boison1, D J A Santos2, A H T Utsunomiya2, R Carvalheiro2, H H R Neves2, A M Perez O'Brien3, J F Garcia4, J Sölkner3, M V G B da Silva5.   

Abstract

Genotype imputation is widely used as a cost-effective strategy in genomic evaluation of cattle. Key determinants of imputation accuracies, such as linkage disequilibrium patterns, marker densities, and ascertainment bias, differ between Bos indicus and Bos taurus breeds. Consequently, there is a need to investigate effectiveness of genotype imputation in indicine breeds. Thus, the objective of the study was to investigate strategies and factors affecting the accuracy of genotype imputation in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle. Four imputation scenarios were studied using 471 sires and 1,644 dams genotyped on Illumina BovineHD (HD-777K; San Diego, CA) and BovineSNP50 (50K) chips, respectively. Scenarios were based on which reference high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel (HDP) should be adopted [HD-777K, 50K, and GeneSeek GGP-75Ki (Lincoln, NE)]. Depending on the scenario, validation animals had their genotypes masked for one of the lower-density panels: Illumina (3K, 7K, and 50K) and GeneSeek (SGGP-20Ki and GGP-75Ki). We randomly selected 171 sires as reference and 300 as validation for all the scenarios. Additionally, all sires were used as reference and the 1,644 dams were imputed for validation. Genotypes of 98 individuals with 4 and more offspring were completely masked and imputed. Imputation algorithms FImpute and Beagle v3.3 and v4 were used. Imputation accuracies were measured using the correlation and allelic correct rate. FImpute resulted in highest accuracies, whereas Beagle 3.3 gave the least-accurate imputations. Accuracies evaluated as correlation (allelic correct rate) ranged from 0.910 (0.942) to 0.961 (0.974) using 50K as HDP and with 3K (7K) as low-density panels. With GGP-75Ki as HDP, accuracies were moderate for 3K, 7K, and 50K, but high for SGGP-20Ki. The use of HD-777K as HDP resulted in accuracies of 0.888 (3K), 0.941 (7K), 0.980 (SGGP-20Ki), 0.982 (50K), and 0.993 (GGP-75Ki). Ungenotyped individuals were imputed with an average accuracy of 0.970. The average top 5 kinship coefficients between reference and imputed individuals was a strong predictor of imputation accuracy. FImpute was faster and used less memory than Beagle v4. Beagle v4 outperformed Beagle v3.3 in accuracy and speed of computation. A genotyping strategy that uses the HD-777K SNP chip as a reference panel and SGGP-20Ki as the lower-density SNP panel should be adopted as accuracy was high and similar to that of the 50K. However, the effect of using imputed HD-777K genotypes from the SGGP-20Ki on genomic evaluation is yet to be studied.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beagle; FImpute; Gyr; imputation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25958293     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  12 in total

1.  Impacts of additive, dominance, and inbreeding depression effects on genomic evaluation by combining two SNP chips in Canadian Yorkshire pigs bred in China.

Authors:  Quanshun Mei; Zulma G Vitezica; Jielin Li; Shuhong Zhao; Andres Legarra; Tao Xiang
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 5.100

2.  Revealing misassembled segments in the bovine reference genome by high resolution linkage disequilibrium scan.

Authors:  Adam T H Utsunomiya; Daniel J A Santos; Solomon A Boison; Yuri T Utsunomiya; Marco Milanesi; Derek M Bickhart; Paolo Ajmone-Marsan; Johann Sölkner; José F Garcia; Ricardo da Fonseca; Marcos V G B da Silva
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Assessment of runs of homozygosity islands and estimates of genomic inbreeding in Gyr (Bos indicus) dairy cattle.

Authors:  Elisa Peripolli; Nedenia Bonvino Stafuzza; Danísio Prado Munari; André Luís Ferreira Lima; Renato Irgang; Marco Antonio Machado; João Cláudio do Carmo Panetto; Ricardo Vieira Ventura; Fernando Baldi; Marcos Vinícius Gualberto Barbosa da Silva
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.

Authors:  Jean-Simon Brouard; Brian Boyle; Eveline M Ibeagha-Awemu; Nathalie Bissonnette
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 2.797

5.  SNPrune: an efficient algorithm to prune large SNP array and sequence datasets based on high linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Mario P L Calus; Jérémie Vandenplas
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Linkage Disequilibrium-Based Inference of Genome Homology and Chromosomal Rearrangements Between Species.

Authors:  Daniel Jordan de Abreu Santos; Gregório Miguel Ferreira de Camargo; Diercles Francisco Cardoso; Marcos Eli Buzanskas; Rusbel Raul Aspilcueta-Borquis; Naudin Alejandro Hurtado-Lugo; Francisco Ribeiro de Araújo Neto; Lúcia Galvão de Albuquerque; Li Ma; Humberto Tonhati
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Accuracy of genotype imputation in Labrador Retrievers.

Authors:  J Friedrich; R Antolín; S M Edwards; E Sánchez-Molano; M J Haskell; J M Hickey; P Wiener
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Genomic variants identified from whole-genome resequencing of indicine cattle breeds from Pakistan.

Authors:  Naveed Iqbal; Xin Liu; Ting Yang; Ziheng Huang; Quratulain Hanif; Muhammad Asif; Qaiser Mahmood Khan; Shahid Mansoor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Generating High Density, Low Cost Genotype Data in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.].

Authors:  Mary M Happ; Haichuan Wang; George L Graef; David L Hyten
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Imputation from SNP chip to sequence: a case study in a Chinese indigenous chicken population.

Authors:  Shaopan Ye; Xiaolong Yuan; Xiran Lin; Ning Gao; Yuanyu Luo; Zanmou Chen; Jiaqi Li; Xiquan Zhang; Zhe Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.