Literature DB >> 25958279

First-lactation performance in cows affected by digital dermatitis during the rearing period.

A Gomez1, N B Cook2, M T Socha3, D Döpfer2.   

Abstract

The long-term effects of prepartum digital dermatitis (DD) on first-lactation performance were evaluated in a cohort of 719 pregnant heifers. All heifers were followed for a period of 6 mo until calving and classified on the basis of the number of DD events diagnosed during this period as type I, type II, or type III (no DD, one DD event, and multiple DD events, respectively). Health during the initial 60d in milk (DIM), reproductive and hoof health outcomes, and milk production were compared between the 3 heifer type groups. All logistic and linear models were adjusted for age, height, and girth circumference at enrollment, and the type of trace mineral supplementation during the prepartum period. Overall, cows experiencing DD during the rearing period showed worse production and health outcomes compared with healthy heifers during the first lactation. The percentages of assisted calvings, stillbirths, culled before 60 DIM, and diseased cows during the fresh period were numerically higher in type III cows compared with type I cows. However, none of these differences were statistically significant at the 95% confidence level. Significantly lower conception at first service [odds ratio (OR)=0.55, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.33, 0.89] and increased number of days open (mean=24d, 95% CI: 5.2, 43) were observed in type III cows compared with type I cows. In relation to hoof health, a significantly increased risk of DD during the first lactation was found in type II and III cows (OR=5.16, 95% CI: 3.23, 8.29; and OR=12.5, 95% CI: 7.52, 21.1, respectively), as well as earlier occurrence of DD following calving (OR=59d, 95% CI=20, 96, and OR=74d, 95% CI: 37, 109). Compared with type I cows, statistically significant milk production losses during the initial 305 DIM of 199 and 335kg were estimated in type II and III cows, respectively. This difference was due to a greater rate of production decline (less persistence) after peak yield. No differences in monthly fat and protein percentages or somatic cell counts were observed between the heifer types. Given the long-term effects of DD on health, reproduction, and production, one of the priorities during the rearing period of dairy heifers should be efficient DD prevention and control programs. Such intensive intervention programs based on active long-term DD surveillance, mitigation of risk factors, and prompt treatment are expected to increase overall animal well-being and farm profitability by minimizing the effect of DD during the first lactation.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy cattle; heifer; milk production

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25958279     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  10 in total

1.  Acute phase response of sole ulcer, white line disease and digital dermatitis in dairy cows.

Authors:  Hertta Pirkkalainen; Isto Talvio; Minna Kujala-Wirth; Timo Soveri; Toomas Orro
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-28

Review 2.  Digital Dermatitis in Dairy Cows: A Review of Risk Factors and Potential Sources of Between-Animal Variation in Susceptibility.

Authors:  Maeve A Palmer; Niamh E O'Connell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Lameness in dairy heifers; impacts of hoof lesions present around first calving on future lameness, milk yield and culling risk.

Authors:  L V Randall; M J Green; M G G Chagunda; C Mason; L E Green; J N Huxley
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 2.670

4.  The therapeutic efficacy of allyl isothiocyanate in cows with bovine digital dermatitis.

Authors:  Kanako Chiba; Tamako Miyazaki; Yasushi Sekiyama; Masao Miyazaki; Keiji Okada
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Challenge of Bovine Foot Skin Fibroblasts With Digital Dermatitis Treponemes Identifies Distinct Pathogenic Mechanisms.

Authors:  Kerry Newbrook; Stuart D Carter; Hayley Crosby-Durrani; Nicholas J Evans
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.293

6.  A case-control study regarding factors associated with digital dermatitis in Norwegian dairy herds.

Authors:  Lina Ahlén; Ingrid Hunter Holmøy; Ane Nødtvedt; Åse Margrethe Sogstad; Terje Fjeldaas
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.048

7.  A Highly Effective Protocol for the Rapid and Consistent Induction of Digital Dermatitis in Holstein Calves.

Authors:  Adam C Krull; Vickie L Cooper; John W Coatney; Jan K Shearer; Patrick J Gorden; Paul J Plummer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Metabolomic Profiles Reveal Potential Factors that Correlate with Lactation Performance in Sow Milk.

Authors:  Chengquan Tan; Zhenya Zhai; Xiaojun Ni; Hao Wang; Yongcheng Ji; Tianyue Tang; Wenkai Ren; Hongrong Long; Baichuan Deng; Jinping Deng; Yulong Yin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Meta-Analysis of Bovine Digital Dermatitis Microbiota Reveals Distinct Microbial Community Structures Associated With Lesions.

Authors:  Ben Caddey; Jeroen De Buck
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Identification and Quantification of Bovine Digital Dermatitis-Associated Microbiota across Lesion Stages in Feedlot Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Ben Caddey; Karin Orsel; Sohail Naushad; Hooman Derakhshani; Jeroen De Buck
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 6.496

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.