Literature DB >> 25958168

Body mass index predicts operative time in elective colorectal procedures.

Harish Saiganesh1, David E Stein1, Juan L Poggio2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity currently affects more than a third of the United States population and is associated with increased surgical complications. Compared to all other subspecialties, colorectal surgery is the most affected by the increasing trend in obese surgical patients. Operative time has been found to have the greatest impact on hospital costs and physician workload. This study was conducted to determine whether obesity has a direct impact on operative time in elective colorectal procedures using a high-powered, nationally representative patient sample.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 45,362 patients who underwent open and laparoscopic ileocolic resections, partial colectomies, and low pelvic anastomoses using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2005-2009. Operative time was the main outcome variable, whereas body mass index (BMI) was the main independent variable. BMI was divided into three classes as follows: normal (<25), overweight and/or obese (25-35), and morbidly obese (>35). A univariate linear model was used to analyze the relationship while controlling for confounding factors such as demographics and preoperative conditions. Statistical significance was established at P ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS: Morbidly obese patients were found to have longer operative times than did normal patients across each individual colorectal procedure (P < 0.001), ranging from a mean difference of 17.8 min for open ileocolic resections to 56.6 min for laparoscopic low pelvic anastomoses with colostomies.
CONCLUSIONS: BMI, as an objective measure of obesity, is a direct, statistically significant independent predictor of operative time across elective colorectal procedures.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; Body mass index; Colorectal surgery; Obesity; Operative time

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25958168     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

1.  Impact of radiofrequency energy on intraoperative outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in obese patients.

Authors:  Diletta Cassini; Michelangelo Miccini; Matteo Gregori; Farshad Manoochehri; Gianandrea Baldazzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-04

2.  The superior approach with the stomach roll-up technique improves intraoperative outcomes and facilitates learning laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study between the superior and inferior approach.

Authors:  Takanori Morikawa; Masaharu Ishida; Tatsuyuki Takadate; Tatsuo Hata; Masahiro Iseki; Kei Kawaguchi; Hideo Ohtsuka; Masamichi Mizuma; Hiroki Hayashi; Kei Nakagawa; Fuyuhiko Motoi; Takashi Kamei; Takeshi Naitoh; Michiaki Unno
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Minimally invasive colorectal surgery in the morbid obese: does size really matter?

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Sotirios Popeskou; Mick Harper; Ngianga Kandala; Nuno Figueiredo; Tahseen Qureshi; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Early experience with the ARTISENTIAL® articulated instruments in laparoscopic low anterior resection with TME.

Authors:  I Darwich; M Abuassi; R Aliyev; M Scheidt; M A Alkadri; A Hees; S Demirel-Darwich; M Chand; F Willeke
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.699

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.