Literature DB >> 25958043

The androgen receptor has no direct antiresorptive actions in mouse osteoclasts.

Mieke Sinnesael1, Ferran Jardi1, Ludo Deboel1, Michaël R Laurent2, Vanessa Dubois3, Jeffrey D Zajac4, Rachel A Davey4, Geert Carmeliet1, Frank Claessens3, Dirk Vanderschueren5.   

Abstract

Androgen deficiency or androgen receptor knockout (ARKO) causes high-turnover osteopenia, but the target cells for this effect remain unclear. To examine whether AR in osteoclasts directly suppresses bone resorption, we crossed AR-floxed with cathepsin K-Cre mice. Osteoclast-specific ARKO (ocl-ARKO) mice showed no changes neither in osteoclast surface nor in bone microarchitecture nor in the response to orchidectomy and androgen replacement, indicating that the AR in osteoclasts is not critical for bone maintenance. In line with the lack of a bone phenotype, the levels of AR were very low in osteoclast-enriched cultures derived from bone marrow (BM) and undetectable in osteoclasts generated from spleen precursors. Since tibiae of ubiquitous ARKO mice displayed increased osteoclast counts, the role of AR was further explored using cell cultures from these animals. Osteoclast generation and activity in vitro were similar between ARKO and wildtype control (WT) mice. In co-culture experiments, BM stromal cells (BMSCs) were essential for the suppressive action of AR on osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast activity. Stimulation with 1,25(OH)2 vitamin D3 increased Rankl and decreased Tnfsf11 (osteoprotegerin, Opg) gene expression in BMSCs more than in osteoblasts. This increase in the Rankl/Opg ratio following 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulation was lower, not higher, in ARKO mice. Runx2 expression in BMSCs was however higher in ARKO vs. WT, suggesting that ARKO mice may more readily commit osteoprogenitor cells to osteoblastogenesis. In conclusion, the AR does not seem to suppress bone resorption through direct actions in osteoclasts. BMSCs may however represent an alternative AR target in the BM milieu.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Androgen receptor; Androgens; Bone marrow stromal cell; Bone resorption; Osteoblast; Osteoclast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25958043     DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol        ISSN: 0303-7207            Impact factor:   4.102


  10 in total

Review 1.  Estrogens and Androgens in Skeletal Physiology and Pathophysiology.

Authors:  Maria Almeida; Michaël R Laurent; Vanessa Dubois; Frank Claessens; Charles A O'Brien; Roger Bouillon; Dirk Vanderschueren; Stavros C Manolagas
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 2.  Skeletal and gene-regulatory functions of nuclear sex steroid hormone receptors.

Authors:  Akira Hayakawa; Tomohiro Kurokawa; Yoshiaki Kanemoto; Takahiro Sawada; Jinichi Mori; Shigeaki Kato
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Androgen receptors and experimental bone loss - an in vivo and in vitro study.

Authors:  Joao Paulo Steffens; Leila Santana Coimbra; Carlos Rossa; Alpdogan Kantarci; Thomas E Van Dyke; Luis Carlos Spolidorio
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  A Case of Male Osteoporosis: A 37-Year-Old Man with Multiple Vertebral Compression Fractures.

Authors:  Suhaib Radi; Andrew C Karaplis
Journal:  Case Rep Endocrinol       Date:  2017-07-16

Review 5.  Androgens and Androgen Receptor Actions on Bone Health and Disease: From Androgen Deficiency to Androgen Therapy.

Authors:  Jia-Feng Chen; Pei-Wen Lin; Yi-Ru Tsai; Yi-Chien Yang; Hong-Yo Kang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Sex Steroid Regulation of Oxidative Stress in Bone Cells: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Valeria Sibilia; Daniele Bottai; Roberto Maggi; Francesca Pagani; Raffaella Chiaramonte; Domenica Giannandrea; Valentina Citro; Natalia Platonova; Lavinia Casati
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Commensal Microbiota Enhance Both Osteoclast and Osteoblast Activities.

Authors:  Yoko Uchida; Koichiro Irie; Daiki Fukuhara; Kota Kataoka; Takako Hattori; Mitsuaki Ono; Daisuke Ekuni; Satoshi Kubota; Manabu Morita
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  IGFBP7 acts as a negative regulator of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and oestrogen deficiency-induced bone loss.

Authors:  Chenyi Ye; Weiduo Hou; Mo Chen; Jinwei Lu; Erman Chen; Lan Tang; Kai Hang; Qianhai Ding; Yan Li; Wei Zhang; Rongxin He
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 9.  Sexual Dimorphism in Osteoclasts.

Authors:  Joseph Lorenzo
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 10.  Recent Advances in Osteoclast Biological Behavior.

Authors:  Yang Sun; Jiangbi Li; Xiaoping Xie; Feng Gu; Zhenjiang Sui; Ke Zhang; Tiecheng Yu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-12-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.