Literature DB >> 25957905

New trends in guided nanotherapies for digestive cancers: A systematic review.

Elisabete Fernandes1, José Alexandre Ferreira2, Peixoto Andreia3, Lima Luís4, Sérgio Barroso5, Bruno Sarmento6, Lúcio Lara Santos7.   

Abstract

Digestive tract tumors are among the most common and deadliest malignancies worldwide, mainly due to late diagnosis and lack of efficient therapeutics. Current treatments essentially rely on surgery associated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy agents. Despite an upfront response, conventional drugs often fail to eliminate highly aggressive clones endowed with chemoresistant properties, which are responsible for tumor recurrence and disease dissemination. Synthetic drugs also present severe adverse systemic effects, hampering the administration of biologically effective dosages. Nanoencapsulation of chemotherapeutic agents within biocompatible polymeric or lipid matrices holds great potential to improve the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of conventional chemotherapy while reducing systemic toxicity. Tagging nanoparticle surfaces with specific ligands for cancer cells, namely monoclonal antibodies or antibody fragments, has provided means to target more aggressive clones, further improving the selectivity and efficacy of nanodelivery vehicles. In fact, over the past twenty years, significant research has translated into a wide array of guided nanoparticles, providing the molecular background for a new generation of intelligent and more effective anti-cancer agents. Attempting to bring awareness among the medical community to emerging targeted nanopharmaceuticals and foster advances in the field, we have conducted a systematic review about this matter. Emphasis was set on ongoing preclinical and clinical trials for liver, colorectal, gastric and pancreatic cancers. To the best of our knowledge this is the first systematic and integrated overview on this field. Using a specific query, 433 abstracts were gathered and narrowed to 47 manuscripts when matched against inclusion/exclusion criteria. All studies showed that active targeting improves the effectiveness of the nanodrugs alone, while lowering its side effects. The main focus has been on hepatocarcinomas, mainly by exploring glycans as homing molecules. Other ligands such as peptides/small proteins and antibodies/antibody fragments, with affinity to either tumor vasculature or tumor cells, have also been widely and successfully applied to guide nanodrugs to gastrointestinal carcinomas. Conversely, few solutions have been presented for pancreatic tumors. To this date only three nanocomplexes have progressed beyond pre-clinical stages: i) PK2, a galactosamine-functionalized polymeric-DOX formulation for hepatocarcinomas; ii) MCC-465, an anti-(myosin heavy chain a) immunoliposome for advanced stage metastatic solid tumors; and iii) MBP-426, a transferrin-liposome-oxaliplatin conjugate, also for advanced stage tumors. Still, none has been approved for clinical use. However, based on the high amount of pre-clinical studies showing enthusiastic results, the number of clinical trials is expected to increase in the near future. A more profound understanding about the molecular nature of chemoresistant clones and cancer stem cell biology will also contribute to boost the field of guided nanopharmacology towards more effective solutions.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25957905     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  18 in total

1.  Nanoparticle Targeting of Neutrophils for Improved Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Dafeng Chu; Qi Zhao; Jian Yu; Faya Zhang; Hui Zhang; Zhenjia Wang
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 2.  One-component nanomedicine.

Authors:  Hao Su; Jin Mo Koo; Honggang Cui
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 3.  Liposomal Nanostructures for Drug Delivery in Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Manisit Das; Leaf Huang
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  CDK4/6 inhibitor suppresses gastric cancer with CDKN2A mutation.

Authors:  Shiliang Huang; Hua Ye; Wenying Guo; Xianwen Dong; Nali Wu; Xie Zhang; Zhigang Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

5.  Cancer targeted therapeutics: From molecules to drug delivery vehicles.

Authors:  Daxing Liu; Debra T Auguste
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 6.  Polyphenols delivery by polymeric materials: challenges in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Orazio Vittorio; Manuela Curcio; Monica Cojoc; Gerardo F Goya; Silke Hampel; Francesca Iemma; Anna Dubrovska; Giuseppe Cirillo
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.419

7.  Targeted O-glycoproteomics explored increased sialylation and identified MUC16 as a poor prognosis biomarker in advanced-stage bladder tumours.

Authors:  Sofia Cotton; Rita Azevedo; Cristiana Gaiteiro; Dylan Ferreira; Luís Lima; Andreia Peixoto; Elisabete Fernandes; Manuel Neves; Diogo Neves; Teresina Amaro; Ricardo Cruz; Ana Tavares; Maria Rangel; André M N Silva; Lúcio Lara Santos; José Alexandre Ferreira
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 8.  Antitumor Activities of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Maria Pilar Vinardell; Montserrat Mitjans
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 9.  Altered glycosylation in cancer: A promising target for biomarkers and therapeutics.

Authors:  Divya Thomas; Ashok Kumar Rathinavel; Prakash Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 10.680

10.  Abnormal Protein Glycosylation and Activated PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway: Role in Bladder Cancer Prognosis and Targeted Therapeutics.

Authors:  Céu Costa; Sofia Pereira; Luís Lima; Andreia Peixoto; Elisabete Fernandes; Diogo Neves; Manuel Neves; Cristiana Gaiteiro; Ana Tavares; Rui M Gil da Costa; Ricardo Cruz; Teresina Amaro; Paula A Oliveira; José Alexandre Ferreira; Lúcio L Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.