Literature DB >> 25957502

The Value of Nonenhanced Single-Source Dual-Energy CT for Differentiating Metastases From Adenoma in Adrenal Glands.

Ye Ju1, Ailian Liu2, Yue Dong1, Yijun Liu1, Heqing Wang1, Meiyu Sun1, Renwang Pu1, Anliang Chen1.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of the nonenhanced single-source dual-energy computed tomography (ssDECT) in differentiating metastases from adenomas in adrenal glands.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board, and written informed consent was waived. One hundred twelve patients (66 men:46 women; mean age, 58 years) with 63 adrenal metastases (AMs) and 64 adrenal adenomas (AAs) underwent a plain dual-energy spectral CT imaging from August 2011 to December 2013 were included. The fat (water) density (DFa [Wa]) from the material decomposition (MD) images and CT number and effective atomic number (eff-Z) from the virtual monochromatic spectral (VMS) image sets were measured for the AMs and AAs. The spectral Hounsfield unit (HU) curve (CT number as a function of photon energy from 40 to 140 keV) was generated, and its slope (K) was calculated. The difference of these parameters between AMs and AAs was statistically compared by the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curves were used to compare the diagnostic efficacies of these measures in the identification of AAs and AMs. The distribution of spectral HU curve was analyzed using the chi-square test in terms of its slope K: ascending (K > 0.1), straight (-0.1 ≤ K ≤ 0.1), and descending (K < -0.1).
RESULTS: 1) The CT number (medium, range) of metastases (50.47, 29.93 HU at 40 keV and 29.00, 9.36 HU at 140 keV) was significantly higher than that of adenomas (-0.76, 33.04 to 13.73, 18.96 HU) at each energy level from 40 to 140 keV (P < .05). 2) The fat concentration of metastases (-177.37, 296.38 mg/mL) was statistically lower than that of adenomas (126.73, 328.07 mg/mL; P < .05). 3) The eff-Z of metastases (7.76, 0.23) was significantly higher than that of adenomas (7.42, 0.32; P < .05). 4) With CT number of VMS image at 40 keV of 21.78 HU as a threshold, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating metastases from adenomas was 92.1% and 76.6%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.90. 5) The spectral curve types included 3.2% (2 of 63) ascending, 20.6% (13 of 63) straight, and 76.2% (48 of 63) descending for the metastases, whereas the corresponding numbers were 60.9% (39 of 64), 21.9% (14 of 64), and 17.2% (11 of 64) for the adenomas. The difference was statistically significant (X(2) = 56.63; P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The nonenhanced ssDECT enables a multiparametric approach to provide an excellent sensitivity for identifying AMs from AAs.
Copyright © 2015 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adrenal neoplasm; differential diagnosis; quantification; spectral imaging; x-ray computed tomography

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25957502     DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  8 in total

Review 1.  Fat Quantification in the Abdomen.

Authors:  Cheng William Hong; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-12

2.  Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between split-filter dual-energy images and single-energy images in single-source abdominal CT.

Authors:  André Euler; Markus M Obmann; Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Achille Mileto; Caroline Zaehringer; Anna L Falkowski; David J Winkel; Daniele Marin; Bram Stieltjes; Bernhard Krauss; Sebastian T Schindera
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer using the similarity of quantitative dual-energy CT parameters between the primary lesion and axillary lymph node.

Authors:  Kanako Terada; Hiroko Kawashima; Norihide Yoneda; Fumihito Toshima; Miki Hirata; Satoshi Kobayashi; Toshifumi Gabata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  Dual-energy CT in differentiating benign sinonasal lesions from malignant ones: comparison with simulated single-energy CT, conventional MRI, and DWI.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Zuohua Tang; Zebin Xiao; Rujian Hong; Rong Wang; Yuzhe Wang; Yang Zhan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Gemstone spectral imaging in lung cancer: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Yulin Jia; Xigang Xiao; Qiulian Sun; Huijie Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Fat Quantification in Dual-Layer Detector Spectral Computed Tomography: Experimental Development and First In-Patient Validation.

Authors:  Isabel Molwitz; Graeme Michael Campbell; Jin Yamamura; Tobias Knopp; Klaus Toedter; Roland Fischer; Zhiyue Jerry Wang; Alina Busch; Ann-Kathrin Ozga; Shuo Zhang; Thomas Lindner; Florian Sevecke; Mirco Grosser; Gerhard Adam; Patryk Szwargulski
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 10.065

7.  Detection of left atrial appendage thrombus by dual-energy computed tomography-derived imaging biomarkers in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Wenhuan Li; Mingxi Liu; Fangfang Yu; Weiwei Zhu; Xianbo Yu; Xiaojuan Guo; Qi Yang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-22

8.  Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Imaging in Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Jinping Li; Sheng Zhao; Zaisheng Ling; Daqing Li; Guangsheng Jia; Chenglei Zhao; Xue Lin; Yanmei Dai; Huijie Jiang; Song Wang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.161

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.