Literature DB >> 25957495

Global alterations of the transcriptional landscape during yeast growth and development in the absence of Ume6-dependent chromatin modification.

Aurélie Lardenois1,2, Emmanuelle Becker1, Thomas Walther3,4, Michael J Law5, Bingning Xie1, Philippe Demougin3, Randy Strich5, Michael Primig6.   

Abstract

Chromatin modification enzymes are important regulators of gene expression and some are evolutionarily conserved from yeast to human. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a major model organism for genome-wide studies that aim at the identification of target genes under the control of conserved epigenetic regulators. Ume6 interacts with the upstream repressor site 1 (URS1) and represses transcription by recruiting both the conserved histone deacetylase Rpd3 (through the co-repressor Sin3) and the chromatin-remodeling factor Isw2. Cells lacking Ume6 are defective in growth, stress response, and meiotic development. RNA profiling studies and in vivo protein-DNA binding assays identified mRNAs or transcript isoforms that are directly repressed by Ume6 in mitosis. However, a comprehensive understanding of the transcriptional alterations, which underlie the complex ume6Δ mutant phenotype during fermentation, respiration, or sporulation, is lacking. We report the protein-coding transcriptome of a diploid MAT a/α wild-type and ume6/ume6 mutant strains cultured in rich media with glucose or acetate as a carbon source, or sporulation-inducing medium. We distinguished direct from indirect effects on mRNA levels by combining GeneChip data with URS1 motif predictions and published high-throughput in vivo Ume6-DNA binding data. To gain insight into the molecular interactions between successive waves of Ume6-dependent meiotic genes, we integrated expression data with information on protein networks. Our work identifies novel Ume6 repressed genes during growth and development and reveals a strong effect of the carbon source on the derepression pattern of transcripts in growing and developmentally arrested ume6/ume6 mutant cells. Since yeast is a useful model organism for chromatin-mediated effects on gene expression, our results provide a rich source for further genetic and molecular biological work on the regulation of cell growth and cell differentiation in eukaryotes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interactome; Isw2; Rpd3; Sin3; Transcriptome; Ume6

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25957495      PMCID: PMC5469029          DOI: 10.1007/s00438-015-1051-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics        ISSN: 1617-4623            Impact factor:   3.291


  78 in total

1.  The Ume6 regulon coordinates metabolic and meiotic gene expression in yeast.

Authors:  Roy M Williams; Michael Primig; Brian K Washburn; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Michel Bellis; Cyril Sarrauste de Menthiere; Ronald W Davis; Rochelle E Esposito
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Role of UME6 in transcriptional regulation of a DNA repair gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  D H Sweet; Y K Jang; G B Sancar
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The core meiotic transcriptome in budding yeasts.

Authors:  M Primig; R M Williams; E A Winzeler; G G Tevzadze; A R Conway; S Y Hwang; R W Davis; R E Esposito
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Comprehensive phenotypic analysis of single-gene deletion and overexpression strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Katsunori Yoshikawa; Tadamasa Tanaka; Yoshihiro Ida; Chikara Furusawa; Takashi Hirasawa; Hiroshi Shimizu
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 5.  Control of meiotic gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A P Mitchell
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-03

6.  Genome-wide binding map of the histone deacetylase Rpd3 in yeast.

Authors:  Siavash K Kurdistani; Daniel Robyr; Saeed Tavazoie; Michael Grunstein
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-06-24       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins.

Authors:  Rintaro Saito; Michael E Smoot; Keiichiro Ono; Johannes Ruscheinski; Peng-Liang Wang; Samad Lotia; Alexander R Pico; Gary D Bader; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Regulation of the premiddle and middle phases of expression of the NDT80 gene during sporulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Julia Pak; Jacqueline Segall
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database in PSI-MI 2.5.

Authors:  Ruth Isserlin; Rashad A El-Badrawi; Gary D Bader
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  Saccharomyces genome database provides new regulation data.

Authors:  Maria C Costanzo; Stacia R Engel; Edith D Wong; Paul Lloyd; Kalpana Karra; Esther T Chan; Shuai Weng; Kelley M Paskov; Greg R Roe; Gail Binkley; Benjamin C Hitz; J Michael Cherry
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Identifying novel protein phenotype annotations by hybridizing protein-protein interactions and protein sequence similarities.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Yu-Hang Zhang; Tao Huang; Yu-Dong Cai
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Ume6 Acts as a Stable Platform To Coordinate Repression and Activation of Early Meiosis-Specific Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sheetal A Raithatha; Shivani Vaza; M Touhidul Islam; Brianna Greenwood; David T Stuart
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Reduced dosage of the chromosome axis factor Red1 selectively disrupts the meiotic recombination checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Tovah E Markowitz; Daniel Suarez; Hannah G Blitzblau; Neem J Patel; Andrew L Markhard; Amy J MacQueen; Andreas Hochwagen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.917

4.  CRISPRi screens reveal genes modulating yeast growth in lignocellulose hydrolysate.

Authors:  Friederike Gutmann; Cosimo Jann; Filipa Pereira; Andreas Johansson; Lars M Steinmetz; Kiran R Patil
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Eukaryotic translation factor eIF5A contributes to acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via transcriptional factor Ume6p.

Authors:  Yanfei Cheng; Hui Zhu; Zhengda Du; Xuena Guo; Chenyao Zhou; Zhaoyue Wang; Xiuping He
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Meiotic Interactors of a Mitotic Gene TAO3 Revealed by Functional Analysis of its Rare Variant.

Authors:  Saumya Gupta; Aparna Radhakrishnan; Rachana Nitin; Pandu Raharja-Liu; Gen Lin; Lars M Steinmetz; Julien Gagneur; Himanshu Sinha
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.154

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.