Literature DB >> 2595742

Evaluation of aminoglycoside disposition in patients previously treated with cisplatin.

M L Christensen1, C F Stewart, W R Crom.   

Abstract

The alterations in aminoglycoside disposition in patients previously treated with cisplatin were determined by reviewing the medical records of 37 cancer patients. The patients received 44 courses of an aminoglycoside antibiotic (gentamicin, n = 27; amikacin, n = 14; and tobramycin, n = 3). The mean (SD) half-life of 171 (120) min was greater than our previously published mean aminoglycoside half-life in children with cancer who were not receiving cisplatin. Twenty-five of 44 courses were completed without an aminoglycoside dosage reduction and only 5 courses were discontinued because of delayed aminoglycoside elimination. There was no significant difference in the duration of aminoglycoside therapy between the group that had a dosage reduction and the group that did not [6.6 (2.3) versus 5.8 (2.9) days, p = 0.42, respectively]. Multiple linear regression analysis of patient variables identified serum creatinine and cumulative cisplatin dose as the best predictors of aminoglycoside half-life (r2 = 46.0%, p less than 0.001). The only predictor of aminoglycoside clearance was serum creatinine (r2 = 35.2%, p less than 0.001). Patients previously treated with cisplatin are at greater risk for delayed aminoglycoside elimination. Prior administration of cisplatin is not an absolute contraindication to the use of aminoglycoside antibiotics. When clinically indicated, patients who have previously received cisplatin and have apparently normal renal function should be treated cautiously with standard doses of aminoglycoside antibiotics, and pharmacokinetic monitoring should be routinely performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2595742     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-198911000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  2 in total

Review 1.  Antineoplastic agents. Drug interactions of clinical significance.

Authors:  E van Meerten; J Verweij; J H Schellens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Use of etoposide in patients with organ dysfunction: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  C F Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.