| Literature DB >> 25957315 |
Sayantan Panda1, Dhiraj Naik2, Avinash Kamble3.
Abstract
Knowledge of the natural genetic variation and structure in a species is important for developing appropriate conservation strategies. As genetic diversity analysis among and within populations of Plumbago zeylanica remains unknown, we aimed (i) to examine the patterns and levels of morphological and genetic variability within/among populations and ascertain whether these variations are dependent on geographical conditions; and (ii) to evaluate genetic differentiation and population structure within the species. A total of 130 individuals from 13 populations of P. zeylanica were collected, covering the entire distribution area of species across India. The genetic structure and variation within and among populations were evaluated using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and randomly amplified DNA polymorphism (RAPD) markers. High levels of genetic diversity and significantly high genetic differentiation were revealed by both the markers among all studied populations. High values of among-population genetic diversity were found, which accounted for 60 % of the total genetic variance. The estimators of genetic diversity were higher in northern and eastern populations than in southern and western populations indicating the possible loss of genetic diversity during the spread of this species to Southern India. Bayesian analysis, unweighted pair group method with arithmetic average cluster analysis and principal coordinates analysis all showed similar results. A significant isolation-by-distance pattern was revealed in P. zeylanica by ISSR (r = 0.413, P = 0.05) and RAPD (r = 0.279, P = 0.05) analysis. The results obtained suggest an urgent need for conservation of existing natural populations along with extensive domestication of this species for commercial purpose. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.Entities:
Keywords: Genetic diversity; Plumbago zeylanica; molecular markers; population structure
Year: 2015 PMID: 25957315 PMCID: PMC4501514 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plv048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Genetic diversity within populations of P. zeylanica using ISSR markers. PPB, percentage of polymorphic bands.
| Populations | Region | Effective number of alleles ( | PPB (%) | Nei's genetic diversity ( | Shannon's information index ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solan, Himachal Pradesh | North | 1.03 | 08.30 | 0.021 | 0.033 |
| Panipat, Haryana | North | 1.04 | 10.48 | 0.028 | 0.045 |
| Ananthagiri, Vikarabad, Andhra Pradesh | South | 1.04 | 11.35 | 0.028 | 0.047 |
| Tirupati, Chittor, Andhra Pradesh | South | 1.04 | 10.92 | 0.026 | 0.044 |
| Kolli, Salem, Tamilnadu | South | 1.02 | 09.17 | 0.018 | 0.032 |
| Coimbatore, Tamilnadu | South | 1.06 | 15.72 | 0.042 | 0.069 |
| RFRI Campus, Jorhat, Assam | East | 1.01 | 06.55 | 0.012 | 0.022 |
| NBU Campus, Siliguri, West Bengal | East | 1.02 | 06.99 | 0.016 | 0.027 |
| Kadma, Bankura, West Bengal | East | 1.03 | 11.79 | 0.024 | 0.042 |
| Ajra-Amboli, Kolhapur, Maharashtra | East | 1.03 | 09.61 | 0.022 | 0.037 |
| JNVU Campus, Jodhpur, Rajasthan | West | 1.05 | 13.10 | 0.035 | 0.057 |
| Ellora, Aurangabad, Maharashtra | West | 1.05 | 13.54 | 0.036 | 0.058 |
| Shendi, Bhandardara, Maharashtra | West | 1.06 | 15.28 | 0.038 | 0.063 |
| Average | 1.04 | 11.0 | 0.03 | 0.04 | |
| Species-level | 1.44 (0.347) | 73.8 | 0.26 (0.173) | 0.41 (0.230) |
Genetic diversity within populations of P. zeylanica using RAPD markers. PPB, percentage of polymorphic bands.
| Populations | Region | Effective number of alleles ( | PPB (%) | Nei's genetic diversity ( | Shannon's information index ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solan, Himachal Pradesh | North | 1.07 | 09.05 | 0.040 | 0.057 |
| Panipat, Haryana | North | 1.09 | 11.21 | 0.049 | 0.070 |
| Ananthagiri, Vikarabad, Andhra Pradesh | South | 1.09 | 11.64 | 0.051 | 0.073 |
| Tirupati, Chittor, Andhra Pradesh | South | 1.08 | 10.34 | 0.045 | 0.065 |
| Kolli, Salem, Tamilnadu | South | 1.06 | 08.62 | 0.037 | 0.054 |
| Coimbatore, Tamilnadu | South | 1.11 | 14.22 | 0.062 | 0.089 |
| RFRI Campus, Jorhat, Assam | East | 1.05 | 06.47 | 0.028 | 0.040 |
| NBU Campus, Siliguri, West Bengal | East | 1.06 | 07.76 | 0.034 | 0.048 |
| Kadma, Bankura, West Bengal | East | 1.09 | 12.50 | 0.054 | 0.078 |
| Ajra-Amboli, Kolhapur, Maharashtra | East | 1.07 | 09.05 | 0.039 | 0.056 |
| JNVU Campus, Jodhpur, Rajasthan | West | 1.11 | 13.79 | 0.060 | 0.087 |
| Ellora, Aurangabad, Maharashtra | West | 1.09 | 12.50 | 0.054 | 0.078 |
| Shendi, Bhandardara, Maharashtra | West | 1.12 | 15.95 | 0.069 | 0.100 |
| Average | 1.08 | 11.0 | 0.05 | 0.07 | |
| Species-level | 1.52 (0.329) | 78.9 | 0.31 (0.155) | 0.47 (0.197) |
Analysis of molecular variance for 130 individuals of P. zeylanica using ISSR markers, significance tests after 1000 random permutations. df, degrees of freedom; SSD, sum of squares; TVP, total variance component.
| Source of variation | df | SSD | Variance components | TVP (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variance among region | 3 | 790.71 | 0.75 | 2 | 0.007 |
| Variance among populations (variance within region) | 9 | 2157.27 | 22.62 | 61 | 0.001 |
| Variance within populations | 117 | 1574.50 | 13.45 | 37 | 0.001 |
| Total | 129 | 4522.48 | 36.83 | 100 |
Analysis of molecular variance for 130 individuals of P. zeylanica using RAPD markers, significance tests after 1000 random permutations. df, degrees of freedom; SSD, sum of squares; TVP, total variance component.
| Source of variation | df | SSD | Variance components | TVP (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variance among region | 3 | 706.36 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.656 |
| Variance among populations (variance within region) | 9 | 2154.14 | 22.27 | 57 | 0.001 |
| Variance within populations | 117 | 1946.20 | 16.63 | 43 | 0.001 |
| Total | 129 | 4806.70 | 38.90 | 100 |
Figure 1.Line graphs from the STRUCTURE model of ln P(D) (a measure of the natural logarithm of the posterior probability, P of the data, D) and ΔK for sampled P. zeylanica populations using ISSR marker (P), where K is the hypothesized number of populations. (A) The mean values of ln P(D) and SD from 10 runs for each value of K = 1–20. (B) The distributions of ΔK over K = 1–20.
Figure 2.Genetic structure of P. zeylanica populations inferred from Bayesian clustering method (Pritchard ) STRUCTURE plot of 130 wild P. zeylanica individuals using ISSR markers. The y-axis shows the proportion membership into the various clusters. Each coloured vertical bar represents a single individual and the 10 individuals from each of the 13 sampled populations are grouped together. Vertical black bars have been included as visual separators between the populations.
Figure 3.Line graphs from the STRUCTURE model of ln P(D) (a measure of the natural logarithm of the posterior probability, P of the data, D) and ΔK for sampled P. zeylanica populations using RAPD marker (P), where K is the hypothesized number of populations. (A) The mean values of ln P(D) and SD from 10 runs for each value of K = 1–20. (B) The distributions of ΔK over K = 1–20.
Figure 4.Genetic structure of P. zeylanica populations inferred from Bayesian clustering method (Pritchard ) STRUCTURE plot of 130 wild P. zeylanica individuals using RAPD markers. The y-axis shows the proportion membership into the various clusters. Each coloured vertical bar represents a single individual and the 10 individuals from each of the 13 sampled populations are grouped together. Vertical black bars have been included as visual separators between the populations.