Literature DB >> 25957147

Description of procedures performed on patients by emergency medical services during mass casualty incidents in the United States.

Mazen El Sayed1, Hani Tamim2, N Clay Mann3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency medical services (EMS) preparedness is essential to reduce morbidity and mortality from mass casualty incidents (MCIs).
OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe types and frequencies of common procedures performed during MCIs by EMS providers at different service levels.
METHODS: This study was carried out using the 2012 US National EMS Public-Release Research Dataset maintained by the National Emergency Medical Services Information System. Emergency medical services activations coded as MCI at dispatch or by EMS personnel were included. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services service level was used for the level of service provided. A descriptive analysis characterizing the most common procedure types and frequencies by service level was carried out.
RESULTS: Among the 19831189 EMS activations in the 2012 national data set, 53334 activations had an MCI code, of which 26110 activations were included. There were 8179 advanced life support (31.3%), 5811 basic life support (22.3%), 399 air medical transport (air transport fixed or rotary) (1.5%), and 38 specialty care transport (0.2%) activations. A total of 107 different procedure types were reported. The most common procedures by procedure count were "spine immobilization" (21.8%) followed by "venous access extremity" (14.1%) and "assessment adult" (13.4%). A similar order was found for procedure frequencies by included EMS activations (24.1%, 19.3%, and 18.3%, respectively). Top 20 procedures had different frequencies by levels of care except for "medical director control" (P = .19).
CONCLUSIONS: Advanced EMS interventions are not frequent during MCIs in the United States. Emergency medical services systems with other types of providers or MCI response patterns might report different findings.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25957147     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  3 in total

1.  An epidemiological approach to mass casualty incidents in the Principality of Asturias (Spain).

Authors:  Rafael Castro Delgado; Cecilia Naves Gómez; Tatiana Cuartas Álvarez; Pedro Arcos González
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 2.  [Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].

Authors:  Carsten Lott; Anatolij Truhlář; Anette Alfonzo; Alessandro Barelli; Violeta González-Salvado; Jochen Hinkelbein; Jerry P Nolan; Peter Paal; Gavin D Perkins; Karl-Christian Thies; Joyce Yeung; David A Zideman; Jasmeet Soar
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 0.826

3.  Epidemiology of Emergency Medical Services-Assessed Mass Casualty Incidents according to Causes.

Authors:  Ju Ok Park; Sang Do Shin; Kyoung Jun Song; Ki Jeong Hong; Jungeun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.