Literature DB >> 25956951

Form Follows Function: A Model for Clinical Supervision of Genetic Counseling Students.

Colleen Wherley1, Patricia McCarthy Veach2, Meredith A Martyr3, Bonnie S LeRoy4.   

Abstract

Supervision plays a vital role in genetic counselor training, yet models describing genetic counseling supervision processes and outcomes are lacking. This paper describes a proposed supervision model intended to provide a framework to promote comprehensive and consistent clinical supervision training for genetic counseling students. Based on the principle "form follows function," the model reflects and reinforces McCarthy Veach et al.'s empirically derived model of genetic counseling practice - the "Reciprocal Engagement Model" (REM). The REM consists of mutually interactive educational, relational, and psychosocial components. The Reciprocal Engagement Model of Supervision (REM-S) has similar components and corresponding tenets, goals, and outcomes. The 5 REM-S tenets are: Learning and applying genetic information are key; Relationship is integral to genetic counseling supervision; Student autonomy must be supported; Students are capable; and Student emotions matter. The REM-S outcomes are: Student understands and applies information to independently provide effective services, develop professionally, and engage in self-reflective practice. The 16 REM-S goals are informed by the REM of genetic counseling practice and supported by prior literature. A review of models in medicine and psychology confirms the REM-S contains supervision elements common in healthcare fields, while remaining unique to genetic counseling. The REM-S shows promise for enhancing genetic counselor supervision training and practice and for promoting research on clinical supervision. The REM-S is presented in detail along with specific examples and training and research suggestions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical supervision; Genetic counseling supervision; Reciprocal-engagement model; Student supervision; Supervision goals; Supervision model; Supervision strategies

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25956951     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9837-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  26 in total

1.  Games in clinical genetic counseling supervision.

Authors:  Nathalie McIntosh; Anita Dircks; Jennifer Fitzpatrick; Cheryl Shuman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Genetic counselor perceptions of genetic counseling session goals: a validation study of the reciprocal-engagement model.

Authors:  Julianne E Hartmann; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A Survey of Clinical Supervision in Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Heidi L Lindh; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Korinne Cikanek; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A Qualitative Investigation of Student and Supervisor Perceptions of Live Supervision in Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Susan M Hendrickson; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Closing Thoughts on Supervision.

Authors:  S Kessler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Genetics professionals' experiences with grief and loss: implications for support and training.

Authors:  G Geller; C H Rushton; C Francomano; K Kolodner; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.438

8.  Genetic counseling supervisor competencies: results of a Delphi study.

Authors:  Sonja Eubanks Higgins; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; L DiAnne Borders; Bonnie LeRoy; Nancy Callanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  The impact of supervision training on genetic counselor supervisory identity development.

Authors:  Carrie L Atzinger; Kimberly Lewis; Lisa J Martin; Geoffrey Yager; Catherine Ramstetter; Katie Wusik
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Suicide prevention in the genetic counseling context.

Authors:  J A Peters
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Relationship Between the Supervisory Working Alliance and Student Self-Efficacy in Genetic Counseling Training.

Authors:  Sarah Caldwell; Katie Wusik; Hua He; Geoffrey Yager; Carrie Atzinger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Examining clinical training through a bicultural lens: Experiences of genetic counseling students who identify with a racial or ethnic minority group.

Authors:  Nikkola Carmichael; Krista Redlinger-Grosse; Shira Birnbaum
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 2.717

3.  Effects of Anxiety on Novice Genetic Counseling Students' Experience of Supervised Clinical Rotations.

Authors:  Ian M MacFarlane; Pat McCarthy Veach; Janelle E Grier; Derek J Meister; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Genetic Counseling Supervisors' Self-Efficacy for Select Clinical Supervision Competencies.

Authors:  Sabra Ledare Finley; Pat McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Bonnie S LeRoy; Nancy Callanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.537

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.