Literature DB >> 25956901

Mode of anaesthesia for preterm Caesarean delivery: secondary analysis from the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Caesarean Registry.

A J Butwick1, Y Y El-Sayed2, Y J Blumenfeld2, S S Osmundson2, C F Weiniger3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preterm delivery is often performed by Caesarean section. We investigated modes of anaesthesia and risk factors for general anaesthesia among women undergoing preterm Caesarean delivery.
METHODS: Women undergoing Caesarean delivery between 24(+0) and 36(+6) weeks' gestation were identified from a multicentre US registry. The mode of anaesthesia was classified as neuraxial anaesthesia (spinal, epidural, or combined spinal and epidural) or general anaesthesia. Logistic regression was used to identify patient characteristic, obstetric, and peripartum risk factors associated with general anaesthesia.
RESULTS: Within the study cohort, 11 539 women had preterm Caesarean delivery; 9510 (82.4%) underwent neuraxial anaesthesia and 2029 (17.6%) general anaesthesia. In our multivariate model, African-American race [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.7-2.2], Hispanic ethnicity (aOR=1.5; 95% CI=1.2-1.8), other race (aOR=1.4; 95% CI=1.1-1.9), and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome or eclampsia (aOR=2.8; 95% CI=2.2-3.5) were independently associated with receiving general anaesthesia for preterm Caesarean delivery. Women with an emergency Caesarean delivery indication had the highest odds for general anaesthesia (aOR=3.5; 95% CI=3.1-3.9). For every 1 week decrease in gestational age at delivery, the adjusted odds of general anaesthesia increased by 13%.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, nearly one in five women received general anaesthesia for preterm Caesarean delivery. Although potential confounding by unmeasured factors cannot be excluded, our findings suggest that early gestational age at delivery, emergent Caesarean delivery indications, hypertensive disease, and non-Caucasian race or ethnicity are associated with general anaesthesia for preterm Caesarean delivery.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean; anaesthesia; preterm

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25956901      PMCID: PMC4500761          DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  34 in total

1.  Maternal health insurance coverage as a determinant of obstetrical anesthesia care.

Authors:  T E Obst; E Nauenberg; G M Buck
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2001-05

2.  Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States.

Authors:  Fay Menacker; Brady E Hamilton
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2010-03

3.  Conversion of regional to general anaesthesia at caesarean section: increasing the use of regional anaesthesia through continuous prospective audit.

Authors:  M A Rafi; Z Arfeen; U Misra
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  2010-03-02       Impact factor: 2.603

4.  Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mark B Landon; John C Hauth; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Sharon Leindecker; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Alan M Peaceman; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Baha Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Obstetrical intervention and the singleton preterm birth rate in the United States from 1991-2006.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Eugene Declercq; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The premature infant: anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  S H Rolbin; M M Cohen; C M Levinton; E N Kelly; D Farine
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Anaesthetic morbidity following caesarean section under epidural or general anaesthesia.

Authors:  B M Morgan; J M Aulakh; J P Barker; P W Reginald; T Goroszeniuk; A Trojanowski
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-02-11       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants.

Authors:  Allison S Bryant; Ayaba Worjoloh; Aaron B Caughey; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Ethnic variations in severe maternal morbidity in the UK- a case control study.

Authors:  Manisha Nair; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Marian Knight
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Born too soon: the global epidemiology of 15 million preterm births.

Authors:  Hannah Blencowe; Simon Cousens; Doris Chou; Mikkel Oestergaard; Lale Say; Ann-Beth Moller; Mary Kinney; Joy Lawn
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.223

View more
  3 in total

1.  Obstetric Anesthesia Practice in the Tertiary Care Center: A 7-Year Retrospective Study and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Obstetric Anesthesia Practice.

Authors:  Paweł Krawczyk; Remigiusz Jaśkiewicz; Hubert Huras; Magdalena Kołak
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Peripartum racial/ethnic disparities.

Authors:  Elizabeth M S Lange; Paloma Toledo
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2021-07-01

Review 3.  The Current Role of General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Laurence Ring; Ruth Landau; Carlos Delgado
Journal:  Curr Anesthesiol Rep       Date:  2021-02-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.