Shirley L Shih1,2, Paul Gerrard3, Richard Goldstein1, Jacqueline Mix4, Colleen M Ryan5,6, Paulette Niewczyk4,7, Lewis Kazis8, Jaye Hefner9, D Clay Ackerly10,11, Ross Zafonte1,2, Jeffrey C Schneider12,13. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 3. New England Rehabilitation Hospital of Portland, Portland, ME, USA. 4. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, Amherst, NY, USA. 5. Sumner Redstone Burn Center, Surgical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Shriners Hospital for Children®-Boston, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Daemen College, Health Care Studies Department, Amherst, NY, USA. 8. Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 9. Department of Internal Medicine, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 10. Department of Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. 11. Department of Medicine and Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 12. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. jcschneider@partners.org. 13. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. jcschneider@partners.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine functional status versus medical comorbidities as predictors of acute care readmissions in medically complex patients. DESIGN: Retrospective database study. SETTING: U.S. inpatient rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects included 120,957 patients in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation admitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities under the medically complex impairment group code between 2002 and 2011. INTERVENTIONS: A Basic Model based on gender and functional status was developed using logistic regression to predict the odds of 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmission from inpatient rehabilitation facilities to acute care hospitals. Functional status was measured by the FIM(®) motor score. The Basic Model was compared to six other predictive models-three Basic Plus Models that added a comorbidity measure to the Basic Model and three Gender-Comorbidity Models that included only gender and a comorbidity measure. The three comorbidity measures used were the Elixhauser index, Deyo-Charlson index, and Medicare comorbidity tier system. The c-statistic was the primary measure of model performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We investigated 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmission to acute care hospitals from inpatient rehabilitation facilities. RESULTS: Basic Model c-statistics predicting 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmissions were 0.69, 0.64, and 0.65, respectively. The best-performing Basic Plus Model (Basic+Elixhauser) c-statistics were only 0.02 better than the Basic Model, and the best-performing Gender-Comorbidity Model (Gender+Elixhauser) c-statistics were more than 0.07 worse than the Basic Model. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission models based on functional status consistently outperform models based on medical comorbidities. There is opportunity to improve current national readmission risk models to more accurately predict readmissions by incorporating functional data.
OBJECTIVE: To examine functional status versus medical comorbidities as predictors of acute care readmissions in medically complex patients. DESIGN: Retrospective database study. SETTING: U.S. inpatient rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects included 120,957 patients in the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation admitted to inpatient rehabilitation facilities under the medically complex impairment group code between 2002 and 2011. INTERVENTIONS: A Basic Model based on gender and functional status was developed using logistic regression to predict the odds of 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmission from inpatient rehabilitation facilities to acute care hospitals. Functional status was measured by the FIM(®) motor score. The Basic Model was compared to six other predictive models-three Basic Plus Models that added a comorbidity measure to the Basic Model and three Gender-Comorbidity Models that included only gender and a comorbidity measure. The three comorbidity measures used were the Elixhauser index, Deyo-Charlson index, and Medicare comorbidity tier system. The c-statistic was the primary measure of model performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We investigated 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmission to acute care hospitals from inpatient rehabilitation facilities. RESULTS: Basic Model c-statistics predicting 3-, 7-, and 30-day readmissions were 0.69, 0.64, and 0.65, respectively. The best-performing Basic Plus Model (Basic+Elixhauser) c-statistics were only 0.02 better than the Basic Model, and the best-performing Gender-Comorbidity Model (Gender+Elixhauser) c-statistics were more than 0.07 worse than the Basic Model. CONCLUSIONS: Readmission models based on functional status consistently outperform models based on medical comorbidities. There is opportunity to improve current national readmission risk models to more accurately predict readmissions by incorporating functional data.
Entities:
Keywords:
care transitions; functional status; outcomes; risk assessment; statistical modeling
Authors: B W Penninx; L Ferrucci; S G Leveille; T Rantanen; M Pahor; J M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Addie Middleton; James E Graham; Yu-Li Lin; James S Goodwin; Janet Prvu Bettger; Anne Deutsch; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Yanbo Xu; Mohammad Taha Bahadori; Elizabeth Searles; Michael Thompson; Tejedor-Sojo Javier; Jimeng Sun Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-04-16
Authors: Amit Kumar; Amol M Karmarkar; James E Graham; Linda Resnik; Alai Tan; Anne Deutsch; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jason R Falvey; Robert E Burke; Daniel Malone; Kyle J Ridgeway; Beth M McManus; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2016-03-03
Authors: Donna Huang; Chloe Slocum; Julie K Silver; James W Morgan; Richard Goldstein; Ross Zafonte; Jeffrey C Schneider Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Jia Loon Chong; Lian Leng Low; Darren Yak Leong Chan; Yuzeng Shen; Thiri Naing Thin; Marcus Eng Hock Ong; David Bruce Matchar Journal: Singapore Med J Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 1.858