Guillaume Coutance1, Salima Ouldamar1, Philippe Rouvier2, Samir Saheb3, Caroline Suberbielle4, Nicolas Bréchot5, Sarah Hariri6, Guillaume Lebreton1, Pascal Leprince1, Shaida Varnous7. 1. Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Cardiology Institute. 2. Department of Pathology. 3. Department of Hemo-biotherapies, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, University of Paris VI. 4. Laboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility-CIB-HOG, Saint Louis Hospital. 5. Department of Medical Reanimation. 6. Department of Cardiac Anesthesia and Reanimation, Cardiology Institute, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, University of Paris VI, Paris, France. 7. Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, Cardiology Institute. Electronic address: shaida.varnous@psl.aphp.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Late antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after heart transplantation is suspected to be associated with a poor short-term prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective single-center observational study was performed. Late AMR was defined as AMR occurring at least 1 year after heart transplantation. The study included all consecutive patients with proven and treated late acute AMR at the authors' institution between November 2006 and February 2013. The aim was to analyze the prognosis after late AMR, including mortality, recurrence of AMR, left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Selected endomyocardial biopsy specimens obtained before AMR were also blindly reviewed to identify early histologic signs of AMR. RESULTS: The study included 20 patients treated for late AMR. Despite aggressive immunosuppressive therapies (100% of patients received intravenous methylprednisolone, 90% received intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg],85% received plasmapheresis, 45% received rituximab), the prognosis remained poor. Survival after late AMR was 80% at 1 month, 60% at 3 months, and 50% at 1 year. All early deaths (<3 months, n = 8) were directly attributable to graft dysfunction or to complication of the intense immunosuppressive regimen. Among survivors at 3 months (n = 12), histologic persistence or recurrence of AMR, persistent left ventricular dysfunction, and fulminant CAV were common (33%, 33%, and 17% of patients). Microvascular inflammation was detected in at least 1 biopsy specimen obtained before AMR in 13 patients (65%). CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis after late AMR is poor despite aggressive immunosuppressive therapies. Fulminant CAV is a common condition in these patients. Microvascular inflammation is frequent in endomyocardial biopsy specimens before manifestation of symptomatic AMR.
BACKGROUND: Late antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after heart transplantation is suspected to be associated with a poor short-term prognosis. METHODS: A retrospective single-center observational study was performed. Late AMR was defined as AMR occurring at least 1 year after heart transplantation. The study included all consecutive patients with proven and treated late acute AMR at the authors' institution between November 2006 and February 2013. The aim was to analyze the prognosis after late AMR, including mortality, recurrence of AMR, left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Selected endomyocardial biopsy specimens obtained before AMR were also blindly reviewed to identify early histologic signs of AMR. RESULTS: The study included 20 patients treated for late AMR. Despite aggressive immunosuppressive therapies (100% of patients received intravenous methylprednisolone, 90% received intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg],85% received plasmapheresis, 45% received rituximab), the prognosis remained poor. Survival after late AMR was 80% at 1 month, 60% at 3 months, and 50% at 1 year. All early deaths (<3 months, n = 8) were directly attributable to graft dysfunction or to complication of the intense immunosuppressive regimen. Among survivors at 3 months (n = 12), histologic persistence or recurrence of AMR, persistent left ventricular dysfunction, and fulminant CAV were common (33%, 33%, and 17% of patients). Microvascular inflammation was detected in at least 1 biopsy specimen obtained before AMR in 13 patients (65%). CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis after late AMR is poor despite aggressive immunosuppressive therapies. Fulminant CAV is a common condition in these patients. Microvascular inflammation is frequent in endomyocardial biopsy specimens before manifestation of symptomatic AMR.
Authors: Oluwatoyosi A Onwuemene; Steven C Grambow; Chetan B Patel; Robert J Mentz; Carmelo A Milano; Joseph G Rogers; Ara D Metjian; Gowthami M Arepally; Thomas L Ortel Journal: J Clin Apher Date: 2018-03-10 Impact factor: 2.821
Authors: Kevin J Clerkin; Maryjane A Farr; Susan W Restaino; Emmanuel Zorn; Farhana Latif; Elena R Vasilescu; Charles C Marboe; Paolo C Colombo; Donna M Mancini Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Catarina Costa; Ana Filipa Amador; João Calvão; Roberto Pinto; Pedro Rodrigues Pereira; José Pinheiro Torres; Sandra Amorim; Filipe Macedo Journal: Int J Heart Fail Date: 2022-03-28
Authors: Kevin J Clerkin; Susan W Restaino; Emmanuel Zorn; Elena R Vasilescu; Charles C Marboe; Donna M Mancini Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Benjamin S Mantell; Hector Cordero; Sarah B See; Kevin J Clerkin; Rodica Vasilescu; Charles C Marboe; Yoshifumi Naka; Susan Restaino; Paolo C Colombo; Linda J Addonizio; Maryjane A Farr; Emmanuel Zorn Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 10.247