Literature DB >> 25956551

Type 2 myocardial infarction: A descriptive analysis and comparison with type 1 myocardial infarction.

Uri Landes1, Tamir Bental1, Katia Orvin1, Hana Vaknin-Assa1, Eldad Rechavia1, Zaza Iakobishvili1, Eli Lev1, Abid Assali1, Ran Kornowski2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While 'plaque rupture' is the paradigm of type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI), T2MI is myocardial necrosis secondary to oxygen supply-demand mismatch. Being a heterogeneous and rather newly defined group, data are lacking about T2MI.
METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of patients diagnosed with T2MI in the Rabin Cardiology Center, Israel between the years 2007 and 2012 was performed. Following a descriptive analysis, we used multivariate time dependent models to estimate the association of T2MI with the risk for 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year all-cause-mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and compared it to a T1MI group matched for age, gender and electrocardiographic changes.
RESULTS: The study included 107 T2MI (and 107 T1MI) patients. Sepsis, anemia, and atrial fibrillation were the most common etiologies. Triple anti-thrombotic therapy was given to 22% of T2MI patients (vs. 82% of T1MI patients, p<0.001). Twenty-five percent were managed using urgent percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiography unmasked acute plaque rupture in 29% of T2MI patients group. Compared to T1MI, T2MI was associated with higher all-cause-mortality rate: adjusted-hazard-ratio 7.14 (1.31-38.9) at 30 days, 3.42 (1.51-7.75) at 1 year, and 2.08 (1.14-3.81) at 5 years follow-up. MACE risk was consistent between T2 and T1MI patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The most common T2MI triggers are sepsis, anemia, and atrial fibrillation. Compared to a T1MI population, T2MI is associated with higher short- and long-term mortality rates but equal cardiovascular mortality and MACE risk. As many as 30% may harbor plaque rupture and in fact have T1MI.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Major adverse cardiovascular events; Mortality; Plaque rupture; Triggers; Type 2 myocardial infarction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25956551     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  12 in total

Review 1.  High-sensitivity assays for troponin in patients with cardiac disease.

Authors:  Dirk Westermann; Johannes Tobias Neumann; Nils Arne Sörensen; Stefan Blankenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Treatment and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury compared with type 1 myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Pritha Subramanyam; Eugenia Gianos; Harmony R Reynolds; Binita Shah; Steven P Sedlis
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.439

3.  Type 2 versus type 1 myocardial infarction: a comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes with a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Sonu Gupta; Satyanarayana R Vaidya; Sameer Arora; Amol Bahekar; Santhosh R Devarapally
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-08

4.  Associations Between Cardiac Troponin, Mechanism of Myocardial Injury, and Long-Term Mortality After Noncardiac Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Grant W Reed; Samuel Horr; Laura Young; Joshua Clevenger; Umair Malik; Stephen G Ellis; A Michael Lincoff; Steven E Nissen; Venu Menon
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  A systematic review on the triggers and clinical features of type 2 myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Guangqiang Wang; Na Zhao; Shu Zhong; Jianping Li
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Type 2 myocardial infarction in general medical wards: Clinical features, treatment, and prognosis in comparison with type 1 myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nadav Furie; Ariel Israel; Lee Gilad; Gil Neuman; Fadia Assad; Ilan Ben-Zvi; Chagai Grossman
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Geriatric Population-based Model of Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Alain Putot; Melanie Jeanmichel; Frederic Chague; Patrick Manckoundia; Yves Cottin; Marianne Zeller
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.745

8.  Diagnostic features, management and prognosis of type 2 myocardial infarction compared to type 1 myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kyle White; Mansey Kinarivala; Ian Scott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Meta-analysis Comparing Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Type 1 Myocardial Infarction With a Focus on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.

Authors:  Christopher Reid; Ahmed Alturki; Andrew Yan; Derek So; Dennis Ko; Jean-Francois Tanguay; Amal Bessissow; Shamir Mehta; Shaun Goodman; Thao Huynh
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-02-24

10.  Interphysician agreement on subclassification of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Anton Gard; Bertil Lindahl; Gorav Batra; Nermin Hadziosmanovic; Marcus Hjort; Karolina Elisabeth Szummer; Tomasz Baron
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.994

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.