Literature DB >> 25956225

Analysis of urinary 8-isoprostane as an oxidative stress biomarker by stable isotope dilution using automated online in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Keisuke Mizuno1, Hiroyuki Kataoka2.   

Abstract

We have developed a simple and sensitive method for the determination of the oxidative stress biomarker 8-isoprostane (8-IP) in human urine by automated online in-tube solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-8 column and 0.1% formic acid/methanol (25/75, v/v) as a mobile phase. Electrospray MS/MS for 8-IP was performed on an API 4000 triple quadruple mass spectrometer in negative ion mode. The optimum in-tube SPME conditions were 20 draw/eject cycles with a sample size of 40 μL using a Carboxen 1006 PLOT capillary column for the extraction. The extracted compounds were easily desorbed from the capillary by passage of the mobile phase, and no carryover was observed. Total analysis time of this method including online extraction and analysis was about 30 min for each sample. The in-tube SPME LC-MS/MS method showed good linearity in the concentration range of 20-1000 pg/mL with a correlation coefficient r = 0.9999 for 8-IP using a stable isotope-labeled internal standard, 8-IP-d4. The detection limit of 8-IP was 3.3 pg/mL and the proposed method showed 42-fold higher sensitivity than the direct injection method. The intra-day and inter-day precisions (relative standard deviations) were below 5.0% and 8.5% (n = 5), respectively. This method was applied successfully to the analysis of urine samples without pretreatment or interference peaks. The recovery rates of 8-IP spiked into urine samples were above 92%. This method is useful for assessing the effects of oxidative stress and antioxidant intake.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  8-Isoprostane; Automated sample preparation; In-tube solid-phase microextraction; Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry; Oxidative stress biomarker

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25956225     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2015.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal        ISSN: 0731-7085            Impact factor:   3.935


  6 in total

1.  An exploratory analysis of urinary organophosphate ester metabolites and oxidative stress among pregnant women in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Mary E Ingle; Deborah Watkins; Zaira Rosario; Carmen M VélezVega; Antonia M Calafat; Maria Ospina; Kelly K Ferguson; José F Cordero; Akram Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 2.  Mass Spectrometry in Advancement of Redox Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Xiaofei Chen; Jingyun Lee; Hanzhi Wu; Allen W Tsang; Cristina M Furdui
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  High-Throughput and Sensitive Analysis of Free and Total 8-Isoprostane in Urine with Isotope-Dilution Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Cory Holder; Aaron Adams; Ernest McGahee; Baoyun Xia; Benjamin C Blount; Lanqing Wang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-05-11

Review 4.  Bioanalytical HPLC Applications of In-Tube Solid Phase Microextraction: A Two-Decade Overview.

Authors:  Natalia Manousi; Paraskevas D Tzanavaras; Constantinos K Zacharis
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  PQQ ameliorates D-galactose induced cognitive impairments by reducing glutamate neurotoxicity via the GSK-3β/Akt signaling pathway in mouse.

Authors:  Xing-Qin Zhou; Zhi-Wen Yao; Ying Peng; Shi-Shi Mao; Dong Xu; Xiao-Feng Qin; Rong-Jun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Determination of adjusted reference intervals of urinary biomarkers of oxidative stress in healthy adults using GAMLSS models.

Authors:  Liliya Chamitava; Vanessa Garcia-Larsen; Lucia Cazzoletti; Paolo Degan; Andrea Pasini; Valeria Bellisario; Angelo G Corsico; Morena Nicolis; Mario Olivieri; Pietro Pirina; Marcello Ferrari; Mikis D Stasinopoulos; Maria E Zanolin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.