Literature DB >> 25955965

Predictors of the placebo analgesia response in randomized controlled trials of chronic pain: a meta-analysis of the individual data from nine industrially sponsored trials.

Lene Vase1, Jan Vollert, Nanna B Finnerup, Xiaopeng Miao, Gary Atkinson, Scott Marshall, Robert Nemeth, Bernd Lange, Charlie Liss, Donald D Price, Christoph Maier, Troels S Jensen, Märta Segerdahl.   

Abstract

A large number of analgesics have failed to prove superiority over placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and as this has been related to increasing placebo responses, there is currently an interest in specifying predictors of the placebo response. The literature on placebo mechanisms suggests that factors related to patients' expectations of treatment efficacy are pivotal for the placebo response. Also, general characteristics of RCTs have been suggested to influence the placebo response. Yet, only few meta-analyses have directly tested these hypotheses. Placebo data from 9 industrially sponsored, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trials in 2017 adult patients suffering from chronic painful osteoarthritis (hip or knee) or low back pain were included. The primary outcome was pain intensity. Based on previous studies, we chose 3 expectancy-related primary predictors: type of active medication, randomization ratio, and number of planned face-to-face visits. In addition, explorative analyses tested whether RCT and patients' characteristics predicted the placebo response. Opioid trials, a high number of planned face-to-face visits, and randomization ratio predicted the magnitude of the placebo response, thereby supporting the expectancy hypothesis. Exploratory models with baseline pain intensity, age, washout length, and discontinuation because of adverse events accounted for approximately 10% of the variability in the placebo response. Based on these results and previous mechanisms studies, we think that patients' perception of treatment allocation and expectations toward treatment efficacy could potently predict outcomes of RCTs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25955965     DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  27 in total

1.  The Placebo Effect in Pain Therapies.

Authors:  Luana Colloca
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 13.820

2.  Prior Therapeutic Experiences, Not Expectation Ratings, Predict Placebo Effects: An Experimental Study in Chronic Pain and Healthy Participants.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Titilola Akintola; Nathaniel R Haycock; Maxie Blasini; Sharon Thomas; Jane Phillips; Nicole Corsi; Lieven A Schenk; Yang Wang
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 17.659

Review 3.  Utilization of Facet Joint and Sacroiliac Joint Interventions in Medicare Population from 2000 to 2014: Explosive Growth Continues!

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Joshua A Hirsch; Vidyasagar Pampati; Mark V Boswell
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-10

Review 4.  Design and conduct of confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials.

Authors:  Nathaniel Katz
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-18

5.  Exploring patient experiences of participating in a real and sham dry cupping intervention for nonspecific low back pain: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Hugo Jário Almeida Silva; Mariana Arias Avila; Kamilla Maria Sousa Castro; Yago Tavares Pinheiro; Caio Alano Almeida Lins; Germanna Medeiros Barbosa; Marcelo Cardoso de Souza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 6.  Pain Modulation: From Conditioned Pain Modulation to Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Experimental and Clinical Pain.

Authors:  Janie Damien; Luana Colloca; Carmen-Édith Bellei-Rodriguez; Serge Marchand
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.230

Review 7.  Placebo, nocebo, and neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Lene Vase; Ina Skyt; Kathryn T Hall
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.926

8.  Active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improved quality of life in female patients with fibromyalgia.

Authors:  N Samartin-Veiga; A J González-Villar; M Pidal-Miranda; A Vázquez-Millán; M T Carrillo-de-la-Peña
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.440

Review 9.  A meta-analysis of temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials: an update.

Authors:  Karolina A Wartolowska; Stephen Gerry; Benjamin G Feakins; Gary S Collins; Jonathan Cook; Andrew Judge; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  The magnitude and temporal changes of response in the placebo arm of surgical randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karolina A Wartolowska; Benjamin G Feakins; Gary S Collins; Jonathan Cook; Andrew Judge; Ines Rombach; Benjamin J F Dean; James A Smith; Andrew J Carr
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.