Literature DB >> 25955716

Correction: Determining disease intervention strategies using spatially resolved simulations.

Mark Read, Paul S Andrews, Jon Timmis, Richard A Williams, Richard B Greaves, Huiming Sheng, Mark Coles, Vipin Kumar.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25955716      PMCID: PMC4425704          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


× No keyword cloud information.
The image for Fig 4C is incorrect. Please see the complete, corrected Fig 4 here.
Fig 4

Effector T cell and clinical disease dynamics given anti-CD3 intervention at day 4.

Various efficacies of anti-CD3 intervention have been administered at day 4, which corresponds with encephalitogenic T cell priming. (A) Median effector T cell peak population sizes. (B) CD4Th1 population sizes at 40 days post-induction of EAE; red and blue bars indicate large and non-large effect magnitude changes with respect to the control group, in black. (C) Proportion of simulations that reach a particular maximum clinical disease score. A-test effect magnitude levels are given: 1, 2 and 3 *'s represent small, medium and large effects respectively. (D & E) Proportion of simulations contracting particular clinical scores or greater over time, for control (D) and a drug efficacy of 80% (E).

Effector T cell and clinical disease dynamics given anti-CD3 intervention at day 4.

Various efficacies of anti-CD3 intervention have been administered at day 4, which corresponds with encephalitogenic T cell priming. (A) Median effector T cell peak population sizes. (B) CD4Th1 population sizes at 40 days post-induction of EAE; red and blue bars indicate large and non-large effect magnitude changes with respect to the control group, in black. (C) Proportion of simulations that reach a particular maximum clinical disease score. A-test effect magnitude levels are given: 1, 2 and 3 *'s represent small, medium and large effects respectively. (D & E) Proportion of simulations contracting particular clinical scores or greater over time, for control (D) and a drug efficacy of 80% (E).
  1 in total

1.  Determining disease intervention strategies using spatially resolved simulations.

Authors:  Mark Read; Paul S Andrews; Jon Timmis; Richard A Williams; Richard B Greaves; Huiming Sheng; Mark Coles; Vipin Kumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.