| Literature DB >> 25955716 |
Mark Read, Paul S Andrews, Jon Timmis, Richard A Williams, Richard B Greaves, Huiming Sheng, Mark Coles, Vipin Kumar.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25955716 PMCID: PMC4425704 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 4Effector T cell and clinical disease dynamics given anti-CD3 intervention at day 4.
Various efficacies of anti-CD3 intervention have been administered at day 4, which corresponds with encephalitogenic T cell priming. (A) Median effector T cell peak population sizes. (B) CD4Th1 population sizes at 40 days post-induction of EAE; red and blue bars indicate large and non-large effect magnitude changes with respect to the control group, in black. (C) Proportion of simulations that reach a particular maximum clinical disease score. A-test effect magnitude levels are given: 1, 2 and 3 *'s represent small, medium and large effects respectively. (D & E) Proportion of simulations contracting particular clinical scores or greater over time, for control (D) and a drug efficacy of 80% (E).