Literature DB >> 25955168

Biomechanics of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Evaluation of the Posterior Sloping Angle.

Jeremy M Bellemore1, Eleanor C Carpenter, Nicole Y C Yu, Oliver Birke, David G Little.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The posterior sloping angle (PSA) has been shown to be an objective and reproducible predictor of the risk of patients developing contralateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE); however, prophylactic fixation remains controversial. This in vitro study investigates the biomechanical basis of using a 15-degree PSA as a threshold for prophylactic fixation.
METHODS: Synthetic bone in vitro models of the proximal femur were constructed with a PSA of 10 degrees as a control (normal) group (n=6) by performing an osteotomy at the physis and gluing the head back onto the neck. SCFE groups were created with a PSA of 15, 20, 25, 30, 50, or 60 degrees, by excising a wedge from the posterior neck and gluing them back at the new angle with corresponding posterior translation proportional to the slip angle, and loaded superoinferiorly in compression, to failure. Ultimate strength, energy to failure, and stiffness were recorded.
RESULTS: Increasing the PSA from 10 to 15 degrees only reduced ultimate strength by 13% (P>0.05; CI, -0.21 to -0.06), though a significantly lesser energy to failure was required (-58%, P<0.05; CI, -0.68 to -0.48). Increasing the angle to 20 degrees resulted in a further significant decrease in strength (-19%, P<0.05; CI, -0.28 to -0.10) and energy to failure (-45%, P<0.05; CI, -0.53 to -0.84). The severe SCFE (60-degree PSA) was significantly weaker and less rigid that the control, and the mild and moderate SCFE models (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: These biomechanical data support the threshold of 15-degree PSA as an objective measure for prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip in SCFE. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The number needed to treat with (minimally invasive) prophylactic fixation to prevent contralateral SCFE can be minimized if the above-mentioned threshold is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25955168     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  12 in total

1.  The Universal Entry Point with oblique screw is superior to fixation perpendicular to the physis in moderate slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Jillian Lee; Jonathon A Lillia; Jeremy M Bellemore; David G Little; Tegan L Cheng
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

2.  Morphologic Features of the Contralateral Femur in Patients With Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Resembles Mild Slip Deformity: A Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tobias Hesper; Sarah D Bixby; Daniel A Maranho; Patricia Miller; Young-Jo Kim; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Biomechanical considerations in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and insights into prophylactic fixation.

Authors:  E Leblanc; J M Bellemore; T Cheng; D G Little; O Birke
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Imaging modalities in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  T Hesper; C Zilkens; B Bittersohl; R Krauspe
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Age- and gender-specific variations of the epiphyseal tilt and epiphyseal angle in adolescents without hip pathology.

Authors:  E N Novais; K-P Kienle; P E Miller; G Bowen; Y-J Kim; S D Bixby
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

Review 6.  The potential role of the Alsberg angle as a predictor of lateral growth disturbance of the capital femoral epiphysis in children with developmental dysplasia of the hip treated by closed reduction.

Authors:  Ronghua Gui; Federico Canavese; Shuang Liu; Lianyong Li; Lijun Zhang; Qiwei Li
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a population-based study.

Authors:  Bengt Herngren; Margaretha Stenmarker; Ludek Vavruch; Gunnar Hagglund
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Outcomes after slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a population-based study with three-year follow-up.

Authors:  B Herngren; M Stenmarker; K Enskär; G Hägglund
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Prophylactic pinning should be considered in patients at risk for slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Yohei Tomaru; Hiroshi Kamada; Yuta Tsukagoshi; Shogo Nakagawa; Mio Onishi; Kenta Tanaka; Ryoko Takeuchi; Yuki Mataki; Shumpei Miyakawa; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  J Rural Med       Date:  2019-11-20

10.  The characteristics of the whole pelvic morphology in slipped capital femoral epiphysis: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Masanori Wako; Kensuke Koyama; Yoshihiro Takayama; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.