Literature DB >> 25955105

Poor cell block adequacy rate for molecular testing improved with the addition of Diff-Quik-stained smears: Need for better cell block processing.

Shuko Harada1, Emmanuel Agosto-Arroyo1, Jessica A Levesque1, Evan Alston1, Karen M Janowski1, Gina M Coshatt1, Isam A Eltoum1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the era of personalized medicine, requests for molecular testing of specimens obtained with minimally invasive procedures such as fine-needle aspiration have been increasing. Although cell blocks (CBs) are the recommended specimens for molecular testing, their performance has not been well analyzed. The objective of this study was to assess the frequency and types of samples deemed unsatisfactory for molecular testing (quantity not sufficient [QNS]).
METHODS: One year after the implementation of careful monitoring of QNS cases, cases submitted for lung cancer molecular testing were analyzed for the QNS rate. When the cases were rejected for the inadequacy of CBs of cytology specimens, air-dried, Diff-Quik (DQ)-stained smears were reviewed and used if they were adequate. The QNS rates were compared across 4 specimen categories: large resection, small biopsy, CB alone, and CB with DQ smears.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six cases were studied, and 45 (25.6%) were unsatisfactory. Only 1 of 73 large resection specimens was rejected because of decalcification. The QNS rate for small biopsy specimens was 35.9% (28 of 78), whereas 64% (16 of 25) of cytology cases ordered on CBs were rejected. In combination with DQ smears, the QNS rate of cytology specimens was 32% (8 of 25), which was a significant improvement over CBs only (P = .024) and was not significantly different from the QNS rate for small biopsies (P = .671).
CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of DQ-stained smears for molecular testing improves the adequacy of cytologic samples and provides a minimally invasive alternative to surgical biopsy when molecular analysis of tumor material is necessary.
© 2015 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diff-Quik; air-dried direct smear; cell block; cytology; epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); molecular testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25955105     DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol        ISSN: 1934-662X            Impact factor:   5.284


  5 in total

1.  Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of respiratory lesions: The papanicolaou society of cytopathology consensus recommendations for respiratory cytology.

Authors:  Lester J Layfield; Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri; Zubair Baloch; Hormoz Ehya; Kim Geisinger; Susan J Hsiao; Oscar Lin; Neal I Lindeman; Michael Roh; Fernando Schmitt; Nikoletta Sidiropoulos; Paul A VanderLaan
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 1.582

2.  Do More With Less: Tips and Techniques for Maximizing Small Biopsy and Cytology Specimens for Molecular and Ancillary Testing: The University of Colorado Experience.

Authors:  Dara L Aisner; Mathew D Rumery; Daniel T Merrick; Kimi L Kondo; Hala Nijmeh; Derek J Linderman; Robert C Doebele; Natalie Thomas; Patrick C Chesnut; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Wilbur A Franklin; D Ross Camidge
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 3.  Cell-blocks and other ancillary studies (including molecular genetic tests and proteomics).

Authors:  Vinod B Shidham
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  Comprehensive validation of liquid-based cytology specimens for next-generation sequencing in cancer genome analysis.

Authors:  Toshiaki Akahane; Tomomi Yamaguchi; Yasutaka Kato; Seiya Yokoyama; Taiji Hamada; Yukari Nishida; Michiyo Higashi; Hiroshi Nishihara; Shinsuke Suzuki; Shinichi Ueno; Akihide Tanimoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Utility of bronchial lavage fluids for epithelial growth factor receptor mutation assay in lung cancer patients: Comparison between cell pellets, cell blocks and matching tissue specimens.

Authors:  Shiho Asaka; Akihiko Yoshizawa; Rie Nakata; Tatsuya Negishi; Hiroshi Yamamoto; Takayuki Shiina; Shohei Shigeto; Kazuyuki Matsuda; Yukihiro Kobayashi; Takayuki Honda
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.967

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.