Joshua T Anderson1, Arnold R Haas, Rick Percy, Stephen T Woods, Uri M Ahn, Nicholas U Ahn. 1. *University Hospitals Case Medical Center Department of Orthopaedics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH †Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Columbus, OH ‡New Hampshire NeuroSpine Institute, Bedford, NH; and §University Hospitals Case Medical Center Department of Orthopaedics, Cleveland, OH.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Determine how psychosocial factors, particularly depression, impact lumbar fusion outcomes in a workers' compensation (WC) setting. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: WC patients are less likely to return to work (RTW) after fusion. Few studies evaluate risk factors within this clinically distinct population. METHODS: A total of 2799 Ohio WC subjects were identified who underwent lumbar fusion between 1993 and 2013 using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) procedural and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes. A total of 123 subjects were diagnosed with depression before fusion. Subjects with a smoking history, prior lumbar surgery, permanent disability, and failed back syndrome were excluded. The primary outcome was whether subjects returned to work within 2 years of fusion and sustained this RTW for more than 6 months of the following year. To determine the impact depression had on RTW status, we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis. We also compared time absent from work and other secondary outcomes using χ2 and t tests. RESULTS: Subjects with preoperative depression had significantly higher rates of legal representation, degenerative lumbar disease, and higher medical costs, and used opioid analgesics for considerably longer before and after fusion (P<0.001).Depression group (10.6% [13/123]) and controls (33.0% [884/2676]) met our RTW criteria (P<0.001). Preoperative depression was a negative predictor of RTW status (P<0.001; odds ratio [OR]: 0.38). Additional predictors included working during same week as fusion (OR: 2.15), age more than 50 years (OR: 0.58), chronic preoperative opioid analgesia (OR: 0.58), and legal representation (OR: 0.64). After surgery, depression subjects were absent from work 184 more days compared with controls (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Overall, RTW rates after fusion were low, which was especially true for those with pre-existing depression. Depression was a strong negative predictor of postoperative RTW status. Psychological screening and treatment may be beneficial in these subjects. The poor outcomes in this study may highlight a more limited role for fusion among WC subjects with chronic low back pain where RTW is the treatment goal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Determine how psychosocial factors, particularly depression, impact lumbar fusion outcomes in a workers' compensation (WC) setting. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: WC patients are less likely to return to work (RTW) after fusion. Few studies evaluate risk factors within this clinically distinct population. METHODS: A total of 2799 Ohio WC subjects were identified who underwent lumbar fusion between 1993 and 2013 using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) procedural and International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes. A total of 123 subjects were diagnosed with depression before fusion. Subjects with a smoking history, prior lumbar surgery, permanent disability, and failed back syndrome were excluded. The primary outcome was whether subjects returned to work within 2 years of fusion and sustained this RTW for more than 6 months of the following year. To determine the impact depression had on RTW status, we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis. We also compared time absent from work and other secondary outcomes using χ2 and t tests. RESULTS: Subjects with preoperative depression had significantly higher rates of legal representation, degenerative lumbar disease, and higher medical costs, and used opioid analgesics for considerably longer before and after fusion (P<0.001).Depression group (10.6% [13/123]) and controls (33.0% [884/2676]) met our RTW criteria (P<0.001). Preoperative depression was a negative predictor of RTW status (P<0.001; odds ratio [OR]: 0.38). Additional predictors included working during same week as fusion (OR: 2.15), age more than 50 years (OR: 0.58), chronic preoperative opioid analgesia (OR: 0.58), and legal representation (OR: 0.64). After surgery, depression subjects were absent from work 184 more days compared with controls (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Overall, RTW rates after fusion were low, which was especially true for those with pre-existing depression. Depression was a strong negative predictor of postoperative RTW status. Psychological screening and treatment may be beneficial in these subjects. The poor outcomes in this study may highlight a more limited role for fusion among WC subjects with chronic low back pain where RTW is the treatment goal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Authors: Matthew G Gornet; James Peacock; John Claude; Francine W Schranck; Anne G Copay; Robert K Eastlack; Ryan Benz; Adam Olshen; Jeffrey C Lotz Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Kevin Phan; Dane Moran; Thomas Kostowski; Risheng Xu; Rory Goodwin; Benjamin Elder; Seba Ramhmdani; Ali Bydon Journal: J Spine Surg Date: 2017-06
Authors: Graham S Goh; Ming Han Lincoln Liow; Zhixing Marcus Ling; Chang-Ming Guo; Wai-Mun Yue; Seang-Beng Tan; John Li-Tat Chen; Reuben Chee Cheong Soh Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2021-12
Authors: M Susan Mandell; Abigail R Smith; Mary Amanda Dew; Debra B Gordon; Susan Holtzman; Terese Howell; Andrea F DiMartini; Zeeshan Butt; Mary Ann Simpson; Daniela P Ladner; Christopher E Freise; Stuart A McCluskey; Robert A Fisher; James V Guarrera; Kim M Olthoff; Elizabeth A Pomfret Journal: Transplantation Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Fabrizio Russo; Sergio De Salvatore; Luca Ambrosio; Gianluca Vadalà; Luca Fontana; Rocco Papalia; Jorma Rantanen; Sergio Iavicoli; Vincenzo Denaro Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 3.390