Key factors which concur to the correct therapeutic evaluation of herbal products in free radical-induced diseases.

For many years now the world's scientific literature has been perfused with articles on the therapeutic potential of natural products, the vast majority of which have herbal origins, as in the case of free radical-induced diseases. What is often overlooked is the effort of researchers who take into consideration the preclinical and clinical evaluation of these herbal products, in order to demonstrate the therapeutic efficacy and safety. The first critical issue to be addressed in the early stages of the preclinical studies is related to pharmacokinetics, which is sometimes not very favorable, of some of these products, which limits the bioavailability after oral intake. In this regard, it is worthy underlining how it is often unethical to propose the therapeutic efficacy of a compound on the basis of preclinical results obtained with far higher concentrations to those which, hopefully, could be achieved in organs and tissues of subjects taking these products by mouth. The most widely used approach to overcome the problem related to the low bioavailability involves the complexation of the active ingredients of herbal products with non-toxic carriers that facilitate the absorption and distribution. Even the induction or inhibition of drug metabolizing enzymes by herbal products, and the consequent variations of plasma concentrations of co-administered drugs, are phenomena to be carefully evaluated as they can give rise to side-effects. This risk is even greater when considering that people lack the perception of the risk arising from an over use of herbal products that, by their very nature, are considered risk-free.

Introduction

For many years the use of natural products derived from herbs (thereafter “herbal products”), has been proposed as adjuvant therapy in diseases in which free radicals play a key role on the pathogenesis, e.g., neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular diseases (Qi et al., 2010; Mancuso et al., 2012a; Ergin et al., 2013). The reason for scientists’ interest in herbal products is linked to the fact that a number of preclinical studies have demonstrated the antioxidant and cytoprotective activity of these compounds (Brambilla et al., 2008; Calabrese et al., 2010; Mancuso et al., 2012a; Mancuso and Santangelo, 2014). Indeed, the data on some relevant clinical studies summarized in recent reviews and meta-analyzes have argued, partially or in some cases totally, the evidence obtained from studies of cellular systems or in laboratory animals on alleged therapeutic activity of herbal products. The aim of this article is not to provide an analytical review of the role played by herbal products as adjuvants in the treatment of the aforementioned pathologies (the interested reader may find numerous overviews that extensively examine the biological actions of any product), yet to analyze critically the main factors that should be taken into account when deciding on the therapeutic potential of a product derived from herbs, from the preclinical studies in animal models to clinical results. Each of these factors will be discussed considering, for example, some of the herbal products that yield sufficient preclinical and clinical pharmacology data.

As herbal products taken with food or contained in supplements are different from “prescription drugs” derived from plants (e.g., atropine, digitalis, morphine), they are often referred to as dietary supplements. In light of this, for the purpose of this paper, the terms “herbal products” and “dietary supplement” will be considered equivalent.

Pharmacokinetic Factors

Absorption and Distribution

Because of their chemical structure, several herbal products possess a low solubility and stability in water solution or are quickly deteriorated in body fluids whose pH is neutral. (–)-Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG, Figure ), a polyphenol belonging to the subgroup of flavanols and particularly abundant in green tea, has a stability in water solution and at the body temperature of 37∘C concentration-dependent which gradually decreases with the decrease in the concentration of ECGC and with the contact of the pH of the solution to 7.4 (Proniuk et al., 2002). For these reasons, under physiological conditions, and to the concentrations that are likely to occur in the blood and tissues, the amounts of ECGC are neglectable. Similarly, the polyphenols curcumin (CUR, contained in the rhizome of Curcuma longa Linn., Figure ) and quercetin (QCT, abundant in capers, berries, apples, onions, and other leafy green vegetables, Figure ), in view of their high hydrophobicity, they have a water solubility of about to 1 μg/ml and 2 mg/ml, respectively (Srinivas et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011). Due to these physical–chemical characteristics, EGCG, CUR, and QCT are poorly absorbed after ingestion and have a very low bioavailability (Wang et al., 2014). This limitation in the absorption has complicated the ability of clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy of these natural compounds in numerous diseases, thereby preventing the accumulation of evidence about their utility or not for man. An effective strategy to increase the bioavailability of dietary supplements consists in their complexation with various types of nanoparticles or polysaccharides, e.g., chitosan and tri-methyl-chitosan (Wang et al., 2014). This technology has been recently applied to ECGC, CUR, and QCT which were produced in new formulations that have made a significant improvement in bioavailability; Table shows the variation of the main pharmacokinetic parameters of EGCG, CUR, and QCT complexed with different types of nanoparticles or polysaccharides. A careful analysis of Table shows the complexation of CUR and QCT with the different types of carriers increases markedly both the maximum peak concentration (Cmax) and the necessary time to reach it (Tmax), which suggests a slower, yet more effective absorption of the active ingredient. Simultaneously, the increase in the area under the curve (AUC) demonstrates how the presence of nanoparticles or particles derived from chitosan is capable of improving the bioavailability and this is particularly evident in the case of CUR and QCT. The increase in half-life (T1/2) in the case of formulations based on lipid carriers and polysaccharides implies an extension of the time of persistence of the active ingredient in the body and, therefore, a more prolonged pharmacological action. It is worthy emphasizing that the solid–lipid nanoparticles (SLN) have proved particularly effective carriers both for the CUR that QCT, thus increasing the bioavailability of many degrees of magnitude. As regards the EGCC, the formulation with the derivatives of the chitosan has proved able to increase the AUC by over 50% compared to an increase in Cmax by only 10%.

Chemical structure of (–)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG).

Chemical structure of curcumin.

Chemical structure of quercetin (QCT).

One aspect still to be evaluated when using lipid carriers or polysaccharides is the ability that they are able to “guide” the compound towards the target organs where the accumulation must occur and this is all the more complex as the organs are protected by specific anatomical structures. An example may be the central nervous system as the brain and spinal cord are protected by the blood–brain barrier (BBB), which reduces the penetration of many substances. In this case, the use of certain formulations has proven particularly effective. As demonstrated by Ramalingam and Ko (2014), chitosan is a useful vector for ensuring the accumulation of CUR in the cytosol and in the brain membranes of rat tissue which increases the chances of a possible use of this formulation in neurodegenerative diseases. Moreover, the formulation based on SLN, administered orally, or intravenously, allows a certain accumulation of CUR in the mouse brain (Kakkar et al., 2010).

A further issue to be considered when deciding to evaluate a preparation of nanoparticles, particularly when administered for prolonged periods, is the possible toxicity of the carriers with which the active ingredients are complexed. The use of nanoparticles produced using indigestible oils (e.g., mineral oils) rather than digestible ones (e.g., corn oil) should be avoided because those produced using the indigestible oils may have a considerable growth in size due to the aggregation in the passage from the mouth to the stomach and to the intestine and this may cause a degree of toxicity for those who take it (McClements, 2013; Rao et al., 2013). Furthermore, it is always advisable to avoid the use of vectors in the preparation of which synthetic surfactants have been used (e.g., sorbitan esters and their ethoxylates) or organic solvents (e.g., acetone, hexane) although, currently, there are no reliable data about the quantity of these substances in the final product compared to those used initially for the preparation and, therefore, it is not possible to determine whether they are comprised within the range of toxicity. This consideration is particularly true for organic solvents which are also used, for example, in moderate amounts during the preparation of nanoparticles, but which are subsequently evaporated and only traces of which may remain in the finished product (McClements, 2013). Moreover, the diameter of the nanoparticles is a factor that could determine side effects. There is an inverse relationship between the diameter of the nanoparticles and extent of absorption as the smaller their diameter (usually between 100 and 1000 nm), the greater the possibility that they are absorbed by increasing the intracellular concentration of the active ingredient they contain. Thus, it is worthy considering that, in case of nanoparticles with a very small diameter, for example, very useful to facilitate the passage through the BBB, oral administration can result in a significant absorption at the oral, esophageal, or gastric level, reducing the amount of active ingredient that reaches the small intestine which is the site where absorption occurs. This could lead to the onset of the local, rather than systemic effects (McClements, 2013). In the case of nanoparticles administered by IV (e.g., liposomes), whose primary use is a carrier of antineoplastic drugs and does not seem relevant in the case of herbal products, it is worthy considering the risk of non-allergic hypersensitivity reactions due to complement activation (Wacker, 2013).

The influence of the processes of absorption and distribution in determining the bioavailability and blood and tissue concentrations of a dietary supplement, points out, if proof were needed, the importance of the concentrations achieved compared to the doses administered, a factor that not always guarantees the shift of the results from preclinical studies to man. In this regard, the case of the CUR is exemplary. Due to its low lipophilicity and low bioavailability (for an extensive review on the pharmacokinetics of CUR, see Calabrese et al., 2008), CUR must be administered in high doses to a maximum of 8 g/day. Clinical studies have shown that the administration of CUR at doses of 1–4 g/day PO for 6 months is able to determine plasma concentrations of 250–270 nM within 4 h from administration which are reduced to 60 nM after 24 h (Baum et al., 2008). When administered for a shorter time, as in the study by Garcea et al. (2004) in which CUR was administered at doses of 450–3600 mg/day PO for 1 week in subjects with colorectal cancer, the plasma concentration decreased to 3 nM. Regarding a supramaximal dose of CUR (10–12 g single dose orally to healthy volunteers), the plasma concentration achieved was around 160 nM (Lao et al., 2006). As regards tissue concentrations, the data available are rather limited. In patients with colorectal cancer and treated with CUR 1.8 to 3.6 g/day for 7 days, concentrations in colorectal tumor tissue and normal tissue were, respectively ~7 and 20 nmol/g (Garcea et al., 2005). Based on these concentrations, it is difficult to imagine the effects in humans of CUR that, in several preclinical models, has proven effective in the range 5–50 μM (Garcea et al., 2005; Calabrese et al., 2008; Mancuso et al., 2012a), i.e., concentrations approximately 25–250 times higher than those in plasma; the calculation compared to the concentrations of CUR in the tissues is more difficult, and may appear less accurate, although the order of magnitude may be the same or even greater.

Metabolism and Elimination

The possibility that dietary supplements interact with drug metabolizing enzymes is no longer a matter of debate. Among these enzymes there are isoforms of cytochrome P450 (CYP) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) and sulfotransferases (SULT). The several isoforms of CYP account for phase I metabolism, whereas both UGT and SULT are responsible for phase II reactions. In most cases, both phase I and phase II enzymes increase the hydrophilicity of drugs promoting their elimination, while only a small number of drugs, so-called pro-drugs, needs activation, usually mediated by CYP, to give rise to a pharmacological action (Rautio et al., 2008). The extensive discussion of interactions among herbal products with drug metabolizing enzymes is out of the scope of this article, interested readers can refer to many comprehensive reviews in the literature on this topic (Na et al., 2011; Gurley et al., 2012; Hermann and von Richter, 2012).

Numerous studies have been conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary supplements on drug metabolizing enzymes, although not always the results were consistent. There are several reasons that do not always ensure univocity of evidence, including the different experimental systems used (e.g., the use of cell lines vs. laboratory animals vs. clinical studies), the doses administered and the resulting blood/tissue concentrations reached, above all, the use of individual components of the multicomponent herbal products versus extracts. A typical example is the EGCG that in studies of human hepatocytes or immortalized cell lines induced the CYP1A1 isoform, while in S. typhimurium mutagenesis assay it noncompetitively inhibited CYP1A1, CYP2C9, and CYP3A4 (Williams et al., 2000; Allen et al., 2001; Muto et al., 2001; Shord et al., 2009). Green tea extracts also inhibited the activity of SULT 1A1 and SULT1A3 in a recombinant model of human SULT (Nishimuta et al., 2007; Nagai et al., 2009). Studies on rodents supplemented with various types of green tea showed a moderate induction of CYP1A and UGT in the liver (Maliakal and Wanwimolruk, 2001; Niwattisaiwong et al., 2004; Jang et al., 2005). Lastly, 42 healthy volunteers supplemented with 200 mg EGCG orally for 4 weeks showed a small yet significant reduction in CYP3A4 activity (Chow et al., 2006). These results were not confirmed in another study in which 11 healthy volunteers were treated for 14 days with two capsules/day of green tea containing 200 mg of EGCG, but in the absence of caffeine. This last datum further confirms the confounding role of any additional components in of the raw extracts of herbal products and not directly related to the purified active principle(s) (Donovan et al., 2004). The possible confounding role of additional components in the preparations obtained from the herbal raw material could also affect the results of clinical trials designed to evaluate the effectiveness of herbal products. The intake of purified active principles allow, for instance, an accurate titration of the administered dose versus the therapeutic effects and would be of great help in the identification of specific clinical outcomes, thus making the design of clinical trials more effective.

Pharmacodynamic Factors

In recent years, numerous studies have shown dietary supplements are able to regulate many intracellular pathways involved in the mechanisms of cytoprotection/cytotoxicity. Several papers are available in literature showing inhibitory interactions between herbal products and clearly cytotoxic signaling systems [e.g., the inducible isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) or cyclooxygenase (COX-2), NADPH oxidase] and stimulatory interactions on cytoprotective signaling systems [e.g., superoxide dismutases, catalase, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), etc.]. However, one aspect is not always rightly pointed out and on which more and more attention should be focused in the future, is the assessment of some of these cellular systems with borderline effects, that are cytoprotective or cytotoxic on the basis of the type of cell or tissue and their redox state. For example, NADPH oxidase is a membrane enzyme that, in the presence of NADPH, is able to transfer electrons to molecular oxygen generating free radicals, such as superoxide anion, which, in some compartments, is further converted to hydrogen peroxide (for an extensive review see Seifert and Schultz, 1991). Due to its ability to generate ROS, NADPH oxidase is considered to play a key role in atherosclerosis, and inhibitors of these enzyme have been shown to counteract plaque formation (Meyer and Schmitt, 2000; Yokoyama et al., 2000). On the other hand, in phagosomes NADPH oxidase-derived superoxide and secondary ROS play an anti-infective role because they contribute to kill bacteria and fungi (Segal, 2005). Therefore, dietary supplements, such as QCT and CUR, which reduce NADPH oxidase activity in several preclinical models of atherosclerosis are considered potential adjuvant agents in the prevention or chronic treatment of cardiovascular diseases (Deby-Dupont et al., 2005; Sánchez et al., 2006; Romero et al., 2009). On the other hand, the NADPH oxidase inhibition mediated by these natural compounds could decrease ROS formation in fagosomes, thus reducing microbial killing and transforming these compounds in pro-infective agents (Figure ). Similarly, the induction of HO-1 is considered an early protective event in the cell stress response because it degrades heme into carbon monoxide, ferrous iron and biliverdin which is further transformed, through the biliverdin reductase activity, into the powerful free radical scavenger bilirubin (Maines, 1997; Barone et al., 2009; Mancuso and Barone, 2009a; Mancuso et al., 2012b). However, a sustained induction of HO-1, which could occur in the event of prolonged supplementation with CUR, QCT, and other herbal products, could be harmful because it (i) depletes cells of heme, which is necessary as co-factor of several proteins, (ii) further increases the release of both bilirubin and carbon monoxide, which become per se toxic if produced in excess, and ferrous iron which triggers Fenton reaction (Winterbourn, 1995) and generates ROS, this latter being responsible for both lipid and protein oxidation and cell death (Figure ; Tang et al., 2013; Murphy et al., 2014).

Chronic supplementation with quercetin (QCT) and curcumin (CUR): dual pharmacodynamic effects due to the interaction with NADPH oxidase (NOX) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). For further information see text. BR, bilirubin; BV, biliverdin; CO, carbon monoxide; ROS, reactive oxygen species; Fe+2, ferrous iron; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; ; superoxide anion, –I, inhibition.

Safety Issues

On the basis of the above views, the induction or inhibition of drug metabolizing enzymes by herbal products and the relative changes of hemoconcentrations of any co-administered drugs, are important factors that contribute to the onset of side effects. As previously explained, the literature data related to changes of the enzyme activity of CYP, UGT, or SULT isoforms, are not always univocal, indeed, they are sometimes also contradictory and this has so far not allowed to state any definite theories about the necessity or convenience, to avoid associations between herbal products and certain medications. The main problems in this regard have arisen since the majority of the evidence to support derived from preclinical studies carried out on cell lines or laboratory animals without evidence of a direct effect on humans. For example, Golden et al. (2009) have shown that ECGC reduces the cytotoxic activity of bortezomib, a boronic acid derivative used to treat multiple myeloma or other malignancies, in multiple myeloma and glioblastoma cell lines. According to these results, some articles in the literature recommend avoiding the use of green tea in subjects treated with bortezomib (Mancuso and Barone, 2009b; Shah et al., 2009; Jia and Liu, 2013). Studies on rodents have shown that EGCG-related inhibition of CYP3A4 may increase blood concentrations of verapamil, diltiazem, or midazolam determining potential toxic effects (Muto et al., 2001; Li and Choi, 2008; Chung et al., 2009). In the same experimental model, the moderate induction of CYP1A by green tea determined a reduced effect for the antipsychotic drug clozapine (Jang et al., 2005). However, direct evidence was obtained from humans for a number of herbal products, thus providing unequivocal demonstrations of toxic interactions with drugs. Ginkgo biloba is a herbal product with an excellent bioavailability after oral administration (Kleijnen and Knipschild, 1992), initially considered useful as adjuvant treatment in dementia and consequently dropped due to lack of clinical confirmations (for a recent review see Mancuso et al., 2012a). Chronic administration of ginkgo biloba, which induces CYP2C19, significantly reduced the blood amounts, and therefore the clinical efficacy, of omeprazole particularly in individuals considered poor metabolizers (Yin et al., 2004). Moreover, because of the activation of CYP2C19, ginkgo biloba has reduced the blood concentrations of valproic acid and phenytoin in an epileptic subject causing fatal seizures (Kupiec and Raj, 2005). Lastly, ginkgo biloba has caused the state of coma in an 80-year-old individual suffering from Alzheimer’s disease and treated with trazodone (Galluzzi et al., 2000). This last adverse effect was shown to be related to the ginkgo biloba-mediated stimulation of CYP3A4 activity with marked transformation of trazodone into the active metabolite 1- (m-chlorophenyl) piperazine which increased the GABAergic tone in the brain and precipitated coma (Galluzzi et al., 2000).

Another exception must be made for the grapefruit juice for which there is clinical evidence of dangerous drug interactions. Indeed, grapefruit is rich in furanocoumarins, also well absorbed following grapefruit intake (Uesawa et al., 2008; Messer et al., 2011) which are responsible for the inhibition of CYP3A4 isoform responsible for the metabolism of many drugs. The intake through a diet grapefruit has increased the blood concentrations of ethinylestradiol and caused deep venous thrombosis from the external iliac vein distal to the calf veins (Grande et al., 2009) in a 42-year-old woman. The intake of grapefruit juice is not recommended in patients treated with simvastatin and lovastatin because of a high risk of toxic effects, such as rhabdomyolysis (Dreier and Endres, 2004; Neuvonen et al., 2008). The dietary intake of grapefruit juice increased the hemoconcentrations of nifedipine and caused significant hypotensive effects in a 50-year-old man with essential hypertension (Nakagawa and Goto, 2010).

Conclusion

The above considerations highlight the difficulties faced by researchers when deciding on the possibility or not to start studying the herbal-derived products as adjuvants to conventional therapies for many diseases in which free radicals play a prevalent pathogenic role. Some problems, such as those related to the absorption and distribution of herbal products can be overcome with the help of medicinal chemistry that allows to enhance better absorbed formulations when administered orally, and to reach high concentrations of active ingredient in target organs and tissues. Unfortunately, to date there are no sufficient clinical studies demonstrating the efficacy and safety of these new formulations; in this respect, greater interaction is advocated among researchers who are committed to the preparation and preclinical evaluation of these formulations, often belonging to non-profit institutions, with the pharmaceutical industry, which would have the financial resources to design and implement clinical trials.

The problems stemming from the modulation by herbal products of drug metabolizing enzymes are difficult to manage. What makes it even more difficult is to avoid side-effects arising from the simultaneous intake of medications, dietary or as a supplement, with herbal products and the almost total lack of risk perception by patients. Who would ever think that eating a grapefruit for breakfast or drinking 2–3 glasses of grapefruit juice a day (in particular in warm periods of the year) can pose a serious health risk in case of simultaneous intake of progestogens, statins, or nifedipine? An even more unacceptable risk when considering that the most affected could be vulnerable populations, such as, possibly, the elderly affected by heart disease. A serious approach to solving this problem would provide accurate information on potential risks arising from a prolonged use of herbal products, always recommending medical supervision and shelving the idea that everything is “natural” is “healthy” and “devoid of risks.”

Conflict of Interest Statement

The Associate Editor Silvana Gaetani declares that, despite having collaborated with the author Cesare Mancuso, the review process was handled objectively and no conflict of interest exists. The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Table 1

Summary about the complexation-induced modifications on the main pharmacokinetic parameters of some active ingredients of herbal products.

Compound/formulation	AUC	Cmax	Tmax	T1/2	Reference
ECGC	~116 nM⋅ha	~34.3 nMa	1.5 ha	3.4 ha	Dube et al. (2011)
Chitosan-NP-ECGC	~179 nM⋅ha	~37.8 nMa	1.5 ha		Dube et al. (2011)
Curcumin (CUR)	~312 ng/ml⋅hb	~245 nMb	0.5 hb	~1.0 hb	Shaikh et al. (2009)
Curcumin-PLGA	~3224 ng/ml⋅hc	~710 nMc	2.0 hc		Shaikh et al. (2009)
Curcumin-TMC	~12760 ng/ml⋅hd	~3.3 μMd	2.0 hd	~12 hd	Ramalingam and Ko (2014)
Curcumin-SLN	~42000 ng/ml⋅he	~38 μMe	0.5 he		Kakkar et al. (2010)
Quercetin (QCT)	~56 μg/ml⋅hf	~6 μg/mlf	5 hf	6 hf	Li et al. (2009)
Quercetin-SLN	~324 μg/ml⋅hf	~12 μg/mlf	8 hf	18 hf	Li et al. (2009)