Literature DB >> 25954016

Go big or go home: impact of screening coverage on syphilis infection dynamics.

Ashleigh Tuite1, David Fisman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Syphilis outbreaks in urban men who have sex with men (MSM) are an ongoing public health challenge in many high-income countries, despite intensification of efforts to screen and treat at-risk individuals. We sought to understand how population-level coverage of asymptomatic screening impacts the ability to control syphilis transmission.
METHODS: We developed a risk-structured deterministic compartmental mathematical model of syphilis transmission in a population of sexually active MSM. We assumed a baseline level of treatment of syphilis cases due to seeking medical care in all scenarios. We evaluated the impact of sustained annual population-wide screening coverage ranging from 0% to 90% on syphilis incidence over the short term (20 years) and at endemic equilibrium.
RESULTS: The relationship between screening coverage and equilibrium syphilis incidence displayed an inverted U-shape relationship, with peak equilibrium incidence occurring with 20-30% annual screening coverage. Annual screening of 62% of the population was required for local elimination (incidence <1 case per 100 000 population). Results were qualitatively similar in the face of differing programmatic, behavioural and natural history assumptions, although the screening thresholds for local elimination differed. With 6-monthly or 3-monthly screening, the population coverage required to achieve local elimination was reduced to 39% or 23%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although screening has the potential to control syphilis outbreaks, suboptimal coverage may paradoxically lead to a higher equilibrium infection incidence than that observed in the absence of intervention. Suboptimal screening programme design should be considered as a possible contributor to unsuccessful syphilis control programmes in the context of the current epidemic. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  CONTROL PROGRAMS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MODELING; SCREENING; SYPHILIS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25954016     DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2014-052001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  13 in total

1.  A descriptive study of syphilis testing in Manitoba, Canada, 2015-2019.

Authors:  Souradet Shaw; Pierre Plourde; Penny Klassen; Derek Stein
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2022-02-24

2.  Management of Adult Syphilis: Key Questions to Inform the 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines.

Authors:  Susan Tuddenham; Khalil G Ghanem
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 3.  Global challenges in human immunodeficiency virus and syphilis coinfection among men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Chelsea P Roberts; Jeffrey D Klausner
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 4.  Syphilis.

Authors:  Rosanna W Peeling; David Mabey; Mary L Kamb; Xiang-Sheng Chen; Justin D Radolf; Adele S Benzaken
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 52.329

5.  Countering the rise of syphilis: A role for doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis?

Authors:  Nguyen K Tran; Neal D Goldstein; Seth L Welles
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 1.359

6.  Increased incidence of syphilis in men who have sex with men and risk management strategies, Germany, 2015.

Authors:  Klaus Jansen; Axel J Schmidt; Jochen Drewes; Viviane Bremer; Ulrich Marcus
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016-10-27

7.  Frequency and determinants of consistent STI/HIV testing among men who have sex with men testing at STI outpatient clinics in the Netherlands: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Maartje Visser; Janneke C M Heijne; Arjan A Hogewoning; Fleur van Aar
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  What could re-infection tell us about R0? A modeling case-study of syphilis transmission.

Authors:  Joshua Feldman; Sharmistha Mishra
Journal:  Infect Dis Model       Date:  2019-09-17

9.  Routinized Syphilis Screening Among Men Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ann N Burchell; Darrell H S Tan; Ramandip Grewal; Paul A MacPherson; Sharon Walmsley; Anita Rachlis; Nisha Andany; Sharmistha Mishra; Sandra L Gardner; Janet Raboud; David Fisman; Curtis Cooper; Kevin Gough; John Maxwell; Sean B Rourke; Rodney Rousseau; Tony Mazzulli; Irving E Salit; Vanessa G Allen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 20.999

10.  Exploring How Epidemic Context Influences Syphilis Screening Impact: A Mathematical Modeling Study.

Authors:  Ashleigh R Tuite; Christian Testa; Minttu Rönn; Meghan Bellerose; Thomas Gift; Jessica Fridge; Lauren Molotnikov; Catherine Desmarais; Andrés Berruti; Nicolas Menzies; Yelena Malyuta; Katherine Hsu; Joshua A Salomon
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.