Literature DB >> 25953368

Racial/Ethnic variation in carotid artery revascularization utilization and outcomes: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Siddharth A Wayangankar1, Kevin F Kennedy1, Herbert D Aronow1, John Rundback1, Alfonso Tafur1, Douglas Drachman1, Bhavin Patel1, Chittur A Sivaram1, Faisal Latif2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: It is not known whether racial or ethnic disparities observed with other revascularization procedures are also seen with carotid artery stenting (CAS) and endarterectomy (CEA).
METHODS: We compared the utilization and outcomes of CAS and CEA across racial/ethnic groups within the CARE Registry between May 2007 and December 2012.
RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2012, of the 13 129 patients who underwent CAS, majority were non-Hispanic whites (89.3%), followed by blacks (4.4%), Hispanics (4.3%), and other groups (2.0%). A similar distribution was observed among the 10 953 patients undergoing CEA (non-Hispanic whites, 92.6%; blacks, 3.5%; Hispanics, 2.8%; and other groups, 1.1%). During this time period, a trend toward proportionate increase in CAS utilization was observed in non-Hispanic whites and other groups, whereas the opposite was observed among Hispanics and blacks. This trend persisted even when hospitals performing both CAS and CEA were exclusively analyzed. Adherence to antiplatelet and statin therapy was significantly lower among blacks post CEA. In-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events remained comparable across groups post CAS and CEA. At 30 days, the incidence of stroke (7.2%) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (8.8%) was higher among blacks post CEA (P<0.05), after risk adjustment.
CONCLUSION: During the study period, utilization of CAS and CEA was highest among non-Hispanic whites. There was a trend toward increased CAS utilization over time among non-Hispanic whites and other groups, and a trend toward increased CEA utilization among Hispanics and blacks. In-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events remained comparable between groups, whereas 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were significantly higher in blacks.
© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endarterectomy, carotid; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25953368     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  5 in total

1.  The impact of race on outcomes after carotid endarterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander B Pothof; Peter A Soden; Sarah E Deery; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Grace J Wang; Kakra Hughes; Gert J de Borst; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Challenge and Yield of Enrolling Racially and Ethnically Diverse Patient Populations in Low Event Rate Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Alice J Sheffet; George Howard; Albert Sam; Zafar Jamil; Fred Weaver; David Chiu; Jenifer H Voeks; Virginia J Howard; Susan E Hughes; Linda Flaxman; Mary E Longbottom; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stenting in the US Medicare Population, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Judith H Lichtman; Michael R Jones; Erica C Leifheit; Alice J Sheffet; George Howard; Brajesh K Lal; Virginia J Howard; Yun Wang; Jeptha Curtis; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Interventions Targeting Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Stroke Prevention and Treatment.

Authors:  Deborah A Levine; Pamela W Duncan; Mai N Nguyen-Huynh; Olugbenga G Ogedegbe
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Race Differences in High-Grade Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Brajesh K Lal; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott; Michael Jones; Herbert D Aronow; Angelica Lackey; George Howard
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 10.170

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.