Julien Namur1, Florentina Pascale2, Noboru Maeda3, Manon Sterba2, Saida Homayra Ghegediban2, Valentin Verret2, Angelo Paci4, Atmane Seck5, Keigo Osuga3, Michel Wassef6, Philippe Reb7, Alexandre Laurent8. 1. Archimmed, 12 rue Charles de Gaulle, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France.. Electronic address: julien.namur@archimmed.com. 2. Archimmed, 12 rue Charles de Gaulle, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France. 3. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 4. Pharmacology and Drug Analysis Department, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, Villejuif, France.; Vectorology and Anticancerous Therapeutics, University Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France. 5. Pharmacology and Drug Analysis Department, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, Villejuif, France. 6. Departments of Pathology, AP-HP Hôpital Lariboisère, Paris, France.; University Diderot-Paris 7, Paris, France. 7. Biosphere Medical, Roissy-en-France, France. 8. Departments of Neuroradiology, AP-HP Hôpital Lariboisère, Paris, France.; University Diderot-Paris 7, Paris, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare irinotecan-eluting HepaSphere (BioSphere Medical, Roissy-en-France, France) and DC Bead (Biocompatibles UK Ltd, London, United Kingdom) embolization microspheres for distribution in tumors, release properties, tolerance, and antitumor effects in a model of liver metastases in the rabbit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiple liver tumors were created by injection of a VX2 cell suspension in the portal vein of rabbits. After 2 weeks, embolization of the proper hepatic artery was performed with a fixed volume of bland HepaSphere (n = 5), irinotecan-loaded HepaSphere (n = 6), or irinotecan-loaded DC Bead (n = 5) microspheres. Untreated animals injected with VX2 cells served as control animals (n = 5). Plasma pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolite SN38 were assessed. Histopathology and gene expression analysis were performed 3 days after treatment. RESULTS: Among all treated groups, there was no significant difference in liver enzymes or liver damage on histology. Irinotecan-loaded HepaSphere microspheres showed a faster release of drug than DC Bead microspheres leading to a twofold higher concentration of drug in plasma for HepaSphere microspheres. HepaSphere microspheres were less frequently found inside tumor nodules on histology than DC Bead microspheres (11% vs 48%, P < .001) because of their larger size. Tumor necrosis was significantly greater for rabbits given irinotecan-loaded HepaSphere microspheres (69% of total tumor surface) and rabbits given DC Bead microspheres (50% of total tumor surface) compared with control animals (24% of total tumor surface, P = .006 and P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: HepaSphere and DC Bead microspheres loaded with irinotecan caused significant necrosis of tumor nodules in a model of VX2 liver metastases. This outcome was mostly due to irinotecan delivery rather than vascular occlusion by the microspheres and was greater for HepaSphere microspheres compared with DC Bead microspheres.
PURPOSE: To compare irinotecan-eluting HepaSphere (BioSphere Medical, Roissy-en-France, France) and DC Bead (Biocompatibles UK Ltd, London, United Kingdom) embolization microspheres for distribution in tumors, release properties, tolerance, and antitumor effects in a model of liver metastases in the rabbit. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Multiple liver tumors were created by injection of a VX2 cell suspension in the portal vein of rabbits. After 2 weeks, embolization of the proper hepatic artery was performed with a fixed volume of bland HepaSphere (n = 5), irinotecan-loaded HepaSphere (n = 6), or irinotecan-loaded DC Bead (n = 5) microspheres. Untreated animals injected with VX2 cells served as control animals (n = 5). Plasma pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolite SN38 were assessed. Histopathology and gene expression analysis were performed 3 days after treatment. RESULTS: Among all treated groups, there was no significant difference in liver enzymes or liver damage on histology. Irinotecan-loaded HepaSphere microspheres showed a faster release of drug than DC Bead microspheres leading to a twofold higher concentration of drug in plasma for HepaSphere microspheres. HepaSphere microspheres were less frequently found inside tumor nodules on histology than DC Bead microspheres (11% vs 48%, P < .001) because of their larger size. Tumor necrosis was significantly greater for rabbits given irinotecan-loaded HepaSphere microspheres (69% of total tumor surface) and rabbits given DC Bead microspheres (50% of total tumor surface) compared with control animals (24% of total tumor surface, P = .006 and P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: HepaSphere and DC Bead microspheres loaded with irinotecan caused significant necrosis of tumor nodules in a model of VX2 liver metastases. This outcome was mostly due to irinotecan delivery rather than vascular occlusion by the microspheres and was greater for HepaSphere microspheres compared with DC Bead microspheres.