Salim Baharoon1, Ayman Telmesani2, Hani Tamim3, Eiman Alsafi4, Sameerah Aljohani5, Ebrahim Mahmoud6, Hamdan Al-Jahdali5. 1. King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address: baharoon@hotmail.com. 2. College of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 3. Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon. 4. King Saud Chest Specialty Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 5. King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. 6. Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sepsis syndrome is a major worldwide cause of morbidity and mortality. While community-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock constitutes a major cause of admission to the intensive care unit, hospital-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock remain major preventable causes of ICU admission. This study evaluates the rate, etiology, complication and outcome of community- and hospital-acquired sepsis in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. METHOD: This is a retrospective evaluation of all admissions with severe sepsis and septic shock to a general intensive care unit over a period of six months. RESULTS: A total number of 96 patients were included, which represented 15% of the total number of admissions during the study period. The mean age was 57.4 (SD 21). Sixty percent of cases were due to hospital-acquired infections, and 40% were community-acquired. The majority of the infections acquired in the hospital occurred in medical wards and intensive care units (27% and 21%, respectively). At least one co-morbid condition was present in 94% of the sample patients, with cardiovascular disease and diabetes being the most frequently encountered disorders (58%). Both community and hospital-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock carry very high mortality (58%). The ICU length of stay was significantly longer for hospital and ICU acquired infections. CONCLUSION: Both community and hospital-acquired infections carry high mortality. Hospital-acquired severe sepsis is frequent in medical wards and ICUs, and measures to further evaluate risk factors are prudent.
BACKGROUND:Sepsis syndrome is a major worldwide cause of morbidity and mortality. While community-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock constitutes a major cause of admission to the intensive care unit, hospital-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock remain major preventable causes of ICU admission. This study evaluates the rate, etiology, complication and outcome of community- and hospital-acquired sepsis in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. METHOD: This is a retrospective evaluation of all admissions with severe sepsis and septic shock to a general intensive care unit over a period of six months. RESULTS: A total number of 96 patients were included, which represented 15% of the total number of admissions during the study period. The mean age was 57.4 (SD 21). Sixty percent of cases were due to hospital-acquired infections, and 40% were community-acquired. The majority of the infections acquired in the hospital occurred in medical wards and intensive care units (27% and 21%, respectively). At least one co-morbid condition was present in 94% of the sample patients, with cardiovascular disease and diabetes being the most frequently encountered disorders (58%). Both community and hospital-acquired severe sepsis and septic shock carry very high mortality (58%). The ICU length of stay was significantly longer for hospital and ICU acquired infections. CONCLUSION: Both community and hospital-acquired infections carry high mortality. Hospital-acquired severe sepsis is frequent in medical wards and ICUs, and measures to further evaluate risk factors are prudent.
Authors: Hadi A Rabee; Raghad Tanbour; Zaher Nazzal; Yousef Hamshari; Yousef Habash; Ahmad Anaya; Abbas Iter; Mohammad Gharbeyah; Dina Abugaber Journal: Indian J Crit Care Med Date: 2020-07
Authors: Robby Markwart; Hiroki Saito; Thomas Harder; Sara Tomczyk; Alessandro Cassini; Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek; Felix Reichert; Tim Eckmanns; Benedetta Allegranzi Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 17.440