Literature DB >> 25952588

Toward an evidence-based patient-provider communication in rehabilitation: linking communication elements to better rehabilitation outcomes.

Tiago Silva Jesus1, Isabel Lopes Silva2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a growing interest in linking aspects of patient-provider communication to rehabilitation outcomes. However, the field lacks a conceptual understanding on: (a) 'how' rehabilitation outcomes can be improved by communication; and (b) through 'which' elements in particular. This article elaborates on the conceptual developments toward informing further practice and research.
METHODS: Existing models of communication in healthcare were adapted to rehabilitation, and its outcomes through a comprehensive literature review.
RESULTS: After depicting mediating mechanisms and variables (e.g. therapeutic engagement, adjustment toward disability), this article presents the '4 Rehab Communication Elements' deemed likely to underpin rehabilitation outcomes. The four elements are: (a) knowing the person and building a supportive relationship; (b) effective information exchange and education; (c) shared goal-setting and action planning; and (d) fostering a more positive, yet realistic, cognitive and self-reframing. DISCUSSION: This article describes an unprecedented, outcomes-oriented approach toward the design of rehabilitation communication, which has resulted in the development of a new intervention model: the '4 Rehab Communication Elements'. Further trials are needed to evaluate the impact of this whole intervention model on rehabilitation outcomes.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient–physician communication; engagement; patient–physician relations; psychological adaptation; rehabilitation outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25952588     DOI: 10.1177/0269215515585133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rehabil        ISSN: 0269-2155            Impact factor:   3.477


  7 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral self-management strategies for practice and exercise should be included in neurologic rehabilitation trials and care.

Authors:  Bruce H Dobkin
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Person-centred rehabilitation: what exactly does it mean? Protocol for a scoping review with thematic analysis towards framing the concept and practice of person-centred rehabilitation.

Authors:  Tiago S Jesus; Felicity Bright; Nicola Kayes; Cheryl A Cott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Coaching or gaming? Implications of strategy choice for home based stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Mónica S Cameirão; Asim Smailagic; Guangyao Miao; Dan P Siewiorek
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 4.  Human resources for health (and rehabilitation): Six Rehab-Workforce Challenges for the century.

Authors:  Tiago S Jesus; Michel D Landry; Gilles Dussault; Inês Fronteira
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2017-01-23

5.  A qualitative study on promoting reablement among older people living at home in Norway: opportunities and constraints.

Authors:  Eliva Atieno Ambugo; Imran Dar; Mariya S Bikova; Oddvar Førland; Trond Tjerbo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Methodological issues in the design and evaluation of supported communication for aphasia training: a cluster-controlled feasibility study.

Authors:  Simon Horton; Allan Clark; Garry Barton; Kathleen Lane; Valerie M Pomeroy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Clients and professionals elicit long-term care preferences by using 'What matters to me': A process evaluation in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Catharina M van Leersum; Albine Moser; Ben van Steenkiste; Judith R L M Wolf; Trudy van der Weijden
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2021-07-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.