Literature DB >> 25952162

Adding Ultrasound to the Evaluation of Patients with Pathologic Nipple Discharge to Diagnose Additional Breast Cancers: Preliminary Data.

Haesung Yoon1, Jung Hyun Yoon1, Eun-Kyung Kim1, Hee Jung Moon1, Byeong-Woo Park2, Min Jung Kim3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the malignancy yield of ultrasound Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification and the diagnostic value of adding ultrasound to diagnosis of breast cancer in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Of 267 patients with pathologic nipple discharge seen from February 2003 to March 2011, 198 with histopathologic confirmation and follow-up data were included. Ultrasound images and mammograms were analyzed according to BI-RADS. The malignancy rate for each BI-RADS category and the difference in diagnostic performance resulting from the addition of ultrasound to mammography were calculated. Of the 198 enrolled patients, 34 were diagnosed with a malignancy. The malignancy rates obtained with the addition of ultrasound to mammography were 0.0% (0 of 27) for category 1, 5.9% (1/17) for category 2, 9.4% (5/53) for category 3, 21.5% (20/93) for category 4 and 100% (8/8) for category 5. The malignancy rates for mammography alone were 7.7%-9.0% for categories 1-3, 68.5% (13/19) for category 4 and 100.0% (5/5) for category 5. Adding US to mammography did not significantly increase sensitivity compared with mammography alone. Other diagnostic performance markers such as specificity and positive predictive value were not improved. Among patients for whom mammograms were available, ultrasound detected 5 breast cancers (26.3%) in addition to the 19 breast cancers found by positive mammography. Although it did not increase overall diagnostic performance in patients with pathologic nipple discharge, addition of ultrasound to mammography did detect an additional 26.3% of malignant lesions.
Copyright © 2015 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Mammography; Pathologic nipple discharge; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25952162     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.03.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  6 in total

1.  Reliability of Breast Ultrasound BI-RADS Final Assessment in Mammographically Negative Patients with Nipple Discharge and Radiologic Predictors of Malignancy.

Authors:  Chae Jung Park; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.588

2.  Synergy in combining findings from mammography and ultrasonography in detecting malignancy in women with higher density breasts and lesions over 2 cm in Albania.

Authors:  Altin Malaj; Albana Shahini
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2017-01-12

Review 3.  Ultrasonographic evaluation of women with pathologic nipple discharge.

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Haesung Yoon; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Youngjean Vivian Park; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-04-09

4.  The Value of Adding Ductography to Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge in Women with Negative Mammography.

Authors:  Younjung Choi; Sun Mi Kim; Mijung Jang; Bo La Yun; Eunyoung Kang; Eun-Kyu Kim; So Yeon Park; Bohyoung Kim; Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 7.109

5.  Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis in female patients with nipple discharge.

Authors:  Sanja Barsic Ostojic; Lora Grbanovic; Ana Tonklin; Lucija Kovacevic; Zlatko Marusic; Maja Prutki
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 6.  Nipple discharge: The state of the art.

Authors:  Giovanna Panzironi; Federica Pediconi; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2018-11-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.