Literature DB >> 25952101

Next-Generation Genotyping by Digital PCR to Detect and Quantify the BRAF V600E Mutation in Melanoma Biopsies.

Pierre-Jean Lamy1, Florence Castan2, Nicolas Lozano3, Cécile Montélion3, Patricia Audran3, Frédéric Bibeau4, Sylvie Roques3, Frédéric Montels3, Anne-Claire Laberenne3.   

Abstract

The detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma samples is used to select patients who should respond to BRAF inhibitors. Different techniques are routinely used to determine BRAF status in clinical samples. However, low tumor cellularity and tumor heterogeneity can affect the sensitivity of somatic mutation detection. Digital PCR (dPCR) is a next-generation genotyping method that clonally amplifies nucleic acids and allows the detection and quantification of rare mutations. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical routine performance of a new dPCR-based test to detect and quantify BRAF mutation load in 47 paraffin-embedded cutaneous melanoma biopsies. We compared the results obtained by dPCR with high-resolution melting curve analysis and pyrosequencing or with one of the allele-specific PCR methods available on the market. dPCR showed the lowest limit of detection. dPCR and allele-specific amplification detected the highest number of mutated samples. For the BRAF mutation load quantification both dPCR and pyrosequencing gave similar results with strong disparities in allele frequencies in the 47 tumor samples under study (from 0.7% to 79% of BRAF V600E mutations/sample). In conclusion, the four methods showed a high degree of concordance. dPCR was the more-sensitive method to reliably and easily detect mutations. Both pyrosequencing and dPCR could quantify the mutation load in heterogeneous tumor samples.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25952101     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  17 in total

1.  Plasma DNA methylation marker and hepatocellular carcinoma risk prediction model for the general population.

Authors:  Hui-Chen Wu; Hwai-I Yang; Qiao Wang; Chien-Jen Chen; Regina M Santella
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Real-time detection of BRAF V600E mutation from archival hairy cell leukemia FFPE tissue by nanopore sequencing.

Authors:  Davide Vacca; Valeria Cancila; Alessandro Gulino; Giosuè Lo Bosco; Beatrice Belmonte; Arianna Di Napoli; Ada Maria Florena; Claudio Tripodo; Walter Arancio
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Immunohistochemical staining for p16 and BRAFV600E is useful to distinguish between sporadic and hereditary (Lynch syndrome-related) microsatellite instable colorectal carcinomas.

Authors:  Florence Boissière-Michot; Hélène Frugier; Alexandre Ho-Pun-Cheung; Evelyne Lopez-Crapez; Jacqueline Duffour; Frédéric Bibeau
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  BRAF Heterogeneity in Melanoma.

Authors:  Takamichi Ito; Yuka Tanaka; Maho Murata; Yumiko Kaku-Ito; Kazuhisa Furue; Masutaka Furue
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-02-08

5.  Digital PCR Improves Mutation Analysis in Pancreas Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens.

Authors:  Shonan Sho; Colin M Court; Stephen Kim; David R Braxton; Shuang Hou; V Raman Muthusamy; Rabindra R Watson; Alireza Sedarat; Hsian-Rong Tseng; James S Tomlinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rapid BRAF mutation tests in patients with advanced melanoma: comparison of immunohistochemistry, Droplet Digital PCR, and the Idylla Mutation Platform.

Authors:  Cornelis Bisschop; Arja Ter Elst; Lisette J Bosman; Inge Platteel; Mathilde Jalving; Anke van den Berg; Arjan Diepstra; Bettien van Hemel; Gilles F H Diercks; Geke A P Hospers; Ed Schuuring
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Improving validation methods for molecular diagnostics: application of Bland-Altman, Deming and simple linear regression analyses in assay comparison and evaluation for next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Maksym Misyura; Mahadeo A Sukhai; Vathany Kulasignam; Tong Zhang; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Tracy L Stockley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Detection of BRAF Mutation in Urine DNA as a Molecular Diagnostic for Canine Urothelial and Prostatic Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Mochizuki; Susan G Shapiro; Matthew Breen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Digital detection of endonuclease mediated gene disruption in the HIV provirus.

Authors:  Ruth Hall Sedlak; Shu Liang; Nixon Niyonzima; Harshana S De Silva Feelixge; Pavitra Roychoudhury; Alexander L Greninger; Nicholas D Weber; Sandrine Boissel; Andrew M Scharenberg; Anqi Cheng; Amalia Magaret; Roger Bumgarner; Daniel Stone; Keith R Jerome
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Intratumor and Intertumor Heterogeneity in Melanoma.

Authors:  Tomasz M Grzywa; Wiktor Paskal; Paweł K Włodarski
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.