INTRODUCTION: Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis (CF). In this study, airway and systemic oxidative stress was investigated in CF using malondialdehyde (MDA), an established by-product of polyunsaturated fatty acid peroxidation. METHODS: Exhaled breath condensate (EBC), sputum, and plasma were collected from 40 stable CF patients during routine clinical visits and from 25 healthy controls. MDA was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: MDA levels in sputum (279.8 ± 14.7 vs. 92.7 ± 9.2 nmol/L, p < 0.0001), EBC (139.9 ± 6.7 vs. 71.5 ± 4.3 nmol/L, p < 0.0001), and plasma (176.1 ± 15.9 vs. 129.6 ± 12.9 nmol/L, p < 0.05) were increased in patients with CF compared to healthy controls. MDA measurement in sputum [area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.977, p < 0.0001] or EBC (AUC: 0.94, p < 0.0001) discriminated between patients and controls with greater accuracy than in plasma (AUC: 0.677, p < 0.05). Sputum and EBC MDA levels were elevated in patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <50 % predicted] compared to those with mild-to-moderate functional impairment (FEV1 ≥50 % predicted) (p < 0.05). MDA concentrations in CF patients colonized either with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or with other bacteria were similar (p = NS). The intra- and inter-assay repeatabilities of MDA measurements was similar in all the three types of samples, while the between-visit variability was higher in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: MDA is a potential new airway marker of oxidative stress in patients with CF. Sputum MDA differentiates best between patients and healthy subjects.
INTRODUCTION:Oxidative stress plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of cystic fibrosis (CF). In this study, airway and systemic oxidative stress was investigated in CF using malondialdehyde (MDA), an established by-product of polyunsaturated fatty acid peroxidation. METHODS: Exhaled breath condensate (EBC), sputum, and plasma were collected from 40 stable CFpatients during routine clinical visits and from 25 healthy controls. MDA was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS:MDA levels in sputum (279.8 ± 14.7 vs. 92.7 ± 9.2 nmol/L, p < 0.0001), EBC (139.9 ± 6.7 vs. 71.5 ± 4.3 nmol/L, p < 0.0001), and plasma (176.1 ± 15.9 vs. 129.6 ± 12.9 nmol/L, p < 0.05) were increased in patients with CF compared to healthy controls. MDA measurement in sputum [area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.977, p < 0.0001] or EBC (AUC: 0.94, p < 0.0001) discriminated between patients and controls with greater accuracy than in plasma (AUC: 0.677, p < 0.05). Sputum and EBCMDA levels were elevated in patients with severe pulmonary dysfunction [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <50 % predicted] compared to those with mild-to-moderate functional impairment (FEV1 ≥50 % predicted) (p < 0.05). MDA concentrations in CFpatients colonized either with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or with other bacteria were similar (p = NS). The intra- and inter-assay repeatabilities of MDA measurements was similar in all the three types of samples, while the between-visit variability was higher in plasma. CONCLUSIONS:MDA is a potential new airway marker of oxidative stress in patients with CF. Sputum MDA differentiates best between patients and healthy subjects.
Authors: Peter Franklin; Alexander Moeller; Graham L Hall; Friedrich Horak; Hilary Patterson; Stephen M Stick Journal: Respir Med Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: B Balint; S A Kharitonov; T Hanazawa; L E Donnelly; P L Shah; M E Hodson; P J Barnes Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: W Zetterquist; H Marteus; M Johannesson; S L Nordval; E Ihre; J O N Lundberg; K Alving Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Daniel Sim; Michael C Brothers; Joseph M Slocik; Ahmad E Islam; Benji Maruyama; Claude C Grigsby; Rajesh R Naik; Steve S Kim Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 16.806
Authors: Pramila Maniam; Ama-Tawiah Essilfie; Murugan Kalimutho; Dora Ling; David M Frazer; Simon Phipps; Gregory J Anderson; David W Reid Journal: Biol Res Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 5.612
Authors: Adam J Causer; Janis K Shute; Michael H Cummings; Anthony I Shepherd; Mathieu Gruet; Joseph T Costello; Stephen Bailey; Martin Lindley; Clare Pearson; Gary Connett; Mark I Allenby; Mary P Carroll; Thomas Daniels; Zoe L Saynor Journal: Redox Biol Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 11.799