Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Versus Pneumatic Dilatation for Treatment of Early Achalasia: A Prospective Randomized Study.

INTRODUCTION: Achalasia is an incurable primary motor disorder of the esophagus. The best treatment modality for achalasia is still controversial. This study compared the short- and intermediate-term outcome between endoscopic pneumatic dilatation (EPD) versus laparoscopic esophageal myotomy (LEM) for the management of adult patients with early-stage achalasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled study of adult patients (20-50 years old) who presented with early-stage achalasia (esophageal diameter of <3.5 cm on contrast esophagography). Patients were classified into two groups according to the method of management: Group A patients were treated with LEM, whereas Group B patients were treated with EPD. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, and then 1 year.
RESULTS: In total, 50 patients were managed for a manometrically confirmed diagnosis of achalasia. The median age of presentation was 31.5 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 0.4:1. Both groups were comparable regarding patient demographics and preoperative severity of the condition. The rate of symptoms relief was 76% in EPD compared with 96% in LEM (P=.04). There was a significant lowering of lower esophageal sphincter in the LEM group (P=.0001). Perforation of the esophagus occurred in 8% of the patients during EPD, whereas mucosal tears occurred in 4% of the patients during LEM. Reflux symptoms developed in 28% and 16% of the patients in the EPD and LEM groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: LEM was more effective clinically and manometrically for patients with early-stage achalasia than EPD. There was no significant difference between the two procedures regarding complications.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes