Literature DB >> 25951078

"The Dose Makes the Poison": Informing Consumers About the Scientific Risk Assessment of Food Additives.

Angela Bearth1, Marie-Eve Cousin1, Michael Siegrist1.   

Abstract

Intensive risk assessment is required before the approval of food additives. During this process, based on the toxicological principle of "the dose makes the poison,ˮ maximum usage doses are assessed. However, most consumers are not aware of these efforts to ensure the safety of food additives and are therefore sceptical, even though food additives bring certain benefits to consumers. This study investigated the effect of a short video, which explains the scientific risk assessment and regulation of food additives, on consumers' perceptions and acceptance of food additives. The primary goal of this study was to inform consumers and enable them to construct their own risk-benefit assessment and make informed decisions about food additives. The secondary goal was to investigate whether people have different perceptions of food additives of artificial (i.e., aspartame) or natural origin (i.e., steviolglycoside). To attain these research goals, an online experiment was conducted on 185 Swiss consumers. Participants were randomly assigned to either the experimental group, which was shown a video about the scientific risk assessment of food additives, or the control group, which was shown a video about a topic irrelevant to the study. After watching the video, the respondents knew significantly more, expressed more positive thoughts and feelings, had less risk perception, and more acceptance than prior to watching the video. Thus, it appears that informing consumers about complex food safety topics, such as the scientific risk assessment of food additives, is possible, and using a carefully developed information video is a successful strategy for informing consumers.
© 2015 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspartame; communication; knowledge; risk assessment; steviolglycoside

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25951078     DOI: 10.1111/risa.12410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  2 in total

1.  When Evolution Works Against the Future: Disgust's Contributions to the Acceptance of New Food Technologies.

Authors:  Aisha Egolf; Christina Hartmann; Michael Siegrist
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Consumer Cognition Analysis of Food Additives Based on Internet Public Opinion in China.

Authors:  Heli Li; Jiyang Luo; Hui Li; Shihe Han; Shuzheng Fang; Li Li; Xuhui Han; Yongning Wu
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.