Literature DB >> 25950995

Medical therapy vs surgery for recurrent acute rhinosinusitis.

Milena L Costa1,2, Alkis J Psaltis3, Jayakar V Nayak1, Peter H Hwang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment indications for recurrent acute rhinosinusitis (RARS) remain poorly defined. We studied outcomes of medical vs surgical treatment of RARS, anatomic variants associated with RARS, and factors predicting crossover from medical to surgical treatment.
METHODS: A total of 220 RARS patients treated between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively divided into 3 cohorts: medical only (MED); surgical only (SURG); or medical crossing over into surgical (CROSS). Twenty-two item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores, modified Lund-Kennedy endoscopy scores, and prevalence of anatomic variants by computed tomography (CT) were compared. A total of 220 CT scans obtained for non-sinus indications served as controls. A logistic regression model was used for analysis.
RESULTS: The mean baseline SNOT-22 scores for all cohorts were similar (MED = 48, SURG = 49, CROSS = 45, p < 0.0001). The SURG cohort showed greater reduction of SNOT-22 scores compared to the MED cohort at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up (p < 0.0001). The crossover cohort converted to surgery after escalation of SNOT-22 score by a mean of 15 points (p < 0.03), and showed significant reduction postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Haller cell (odds ratio [OR] 3.9; p < 0.0001), concha bullosa (OR 3.7; p < 0.003), and accessory ostium (OR 2.2; p < 0.01) were more common in the entire RARS group vs controls; however, there were no inter-cohort differences in prevalence.
CONCLUSION: RARS patients can benefit from both medical and surgical treatment strategies, but surgical treatment results in greater symptomatic improvement compared to medical treatment. Patients cross over from medical to surgical treatment when SNOT-22 scores escalate by a mean of 15 points. Haller cell, concha bullosa, and accessory ostium are associated with RARS but are equally common in medical, surgical, and crossover cohorts.
© 2015 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SNOT-22; chronic rhinosinusitis; endoscopic sinus surgery; medical therapy; recurrent acute rhinosinusitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25950995     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  5 in total

1.  Health utility values for patients with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery: a nested case control study.

Authors:  Toby O Steele; Jess C Mace; Raj Dedhia; Luke Rudmik; Timothy L Smith; Jeremiah A Alt
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.858

2.  Acute Exacerbations in Recurrent Acute Rhinosinusitis: Differences in Quality of Life and Endoscopy.

Authors:  Daniel M Beswick; Noel F Ayoub; Jess C Mace; Alia Mowery; Peter H Hwang; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  Pathogenesis of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Said Ahmad Shah; Hajime Ishinaga; Kazuhiko Takeuchi
Journal:  J Inflamm (Lond)       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Recent advances in the surgical management of rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Alexandria F Jaksha; Erik K Weitzel; Adrienne M Laury
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-09-26

5.  Management strategies for recurrent acute rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Jiahui Lin; Ashutosh Kacker
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.