Literature DB >> 25950861

Atypical Fractures are Mainly Subtrochanteric in Singapore and Diaphyseal in Sweden: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Jörg Schilcher1, Tet Sen Howe2, Meng Ai Png3, Per Aspenberg1, Joyce S B Koh2.   

Abstract

We have previously noted a dichotomy in the location of atypical fractures along the femoral shaft in Swedish patients, and a mainly subtrochanteric location of atypical fractures in descriptions of patients from Singapore. These unexpected differences were now investigated by testing the following hypotheses in a cross-sectional study: first, that there is a dichotomy also in Singapore; second, that the relation between subtrochanteric and diaphyseal location is different between the two countries; third, that the location is related to femoral bow. The previously published Swedish sample (n = 151) was re-measured, and a new Singaporean sample (n = 75) was established. Both samples were based on radiographic classification of all femoral fractures in women above 55 years of age. The distance between the fracture line and the lesser trochanter was measured. Femoral bow was classified as present or absent on frontal radiographs. Frequency distribution of the measured distances was analyzed using the Bayesian information criterion to choose the best description of the observed variable distribution in terms of a compilation of normally distributed subgroups. The analysis showed a clear dichotomy of the fracture location: either subtrochanteric or diaphyseal. Subtrochanteric fractures comprised 48% of all fractures in Singapore, and 17% in Sweden (p = 0.0001). In Singapore, femoral bow was associated with more fractures in the diaphyseal subgroup (p = 0.0001). This was not seen in Sweden. A dichotomous location of atypical fractures was confirmed, because it was found also in Singapore. The fractures showed a different localization pattern in the two countries. This difference may be linked to anatomical variations, but might also be related to cultural differences between the two populations that influence physical activity.
© 2015 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANTIRESORPTIVES; BIOMECHANICS; INJURY/FRACTURE HEALING; OSTEOPOROSIS; RADIOLOGY

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25950861     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  14 in total

1.  High and pointed type of femoral localized reaction frequently extends to complete and incomplete atypical femoral fracture in patients with autoimmune diseases on long-term glucocorticoids and bisphosphonates.

Authors:  H Sato; N Kondo; T Nakatsue; Y Wada; J Fujisawa; J J Kazama; T Kuroda; Y Suzuki; M Nakano; N Endo; I Narita
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  The Role of Lower-Limb Geometry in the Pathophysiology of Atypical Femoral Fracture.

Authors:  Ifaz T Haider; Prism S Schneider; W Brent Edwards
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in hypophosphatasia-not atypical at all.

Authors:  F Genest; L Seefried
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Risk of hip, subtrochanteric, and femoral shaft fractures among mid and long term users of alendronate: nationwide cohort and nested case-control study.

Authors:  Bo Abrahamsen; Pia Eiken; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Richard Eastell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-06-28

5.  Total knee arthroplasty in patients with Ranawat type-II valgus arthritic knee with a marked coronal femoral bowing deformity: comparison between computer-assisted surgery and intra-articular resection.

Authors:  Tsan-Wen Huang; Po-Yao Chuang; Chien-Yin Lee; Shih-Jie Lin; Kuo-Chin Huang; Shih-Hsun Shen; Yao-Hung Tsai; Mel S Lee; Robert Wen-Wei Hsu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Localization of Atypical Femoral Fracture on Straight and Bowed Femurs.

Authors:  Young-Chang Park; Soon-Phil Yoon; Kyu Hyun Yang
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2019-05-31

7.  Increased rate of reoperation in atypical femoral fractures is related to patient characteristics and not fracture type. A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  H P Bögl; K Michaëlsson; G Zdolsek; J Höijer; J Schilcher
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The Genetics of Atypical Femur Fractures-a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Jeroen G J van Rooij; Peter R Ebeling; Annemieke J M H Verkerk; M Carola Zillikens
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  The Influence of Demographic Factors on the Location of Bisphosphonate-related Atypical Femoral Fractures.

Authors:  Wei Yuan; Ernest B K Kwek
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 10.  Genetic Risk Factors for Atypical Femoral Fractures (AFFs): A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hanh H Nguyen; Denise M van de Laarschot; Annemieke JMH Verkerk; Frances Milat; M Carola Zillikens; Peter R Ebeling
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2018-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.