| Literature DB >> 25949826 |
Getaw Worku Hassen1, Ana Costea2, Claire Carrazco3, Tsion Frew4, Anand Swaminathan4, Jason Feliberti5, Roger Chirurgi2, Tennyson Smith6, Alice Chen3, Sarah Thompson7, Neola Gushway-Henry7, Bonnie Simmons8, George Fernaine9, Hossein Kalantari2, Soheila Talebi10.
Abstract
Background. Computerized electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis has been of tremendous help for noncardiologists, but can we rely on it? The importance of ST depression and T wave inversions in lead aVL has not been emphasized and not well recognized across all specialties. Objective. This study's goal was to analyze if there is a discrepancy of interpretation by physicians from different specialties and a computer-generated ECG reading in regard to a TWI in lead aVL. Methods. In this multidisciplinary prospective study, a single ECG with isolated TWI in lead aVL that was interpreted by the computer as normal was given to all participants to interpret in writing. The readings by all physicians were compared by level of education and by specialty to one another and to the computer interpretation. Results. A total of 191 physicians participated in the study. Of the 191 physicians 48 (25.1%) identified and 143 (74.9%) did not identify the isolated TWI in lead aVL. Conclusion. Our study demonstrated that 74.9% did not recognize the abnormality. New and subtle ECG findings should be emphasized in their training so as not to miss significant findings that could cause morbidity and mortality.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25949826 PMCID: PMC4407619 DOI: 10.1155/2015/250614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Med Int ISSN: 2090-2840 Impact factor: 1.112
Figure 1ECG representing isolated T wave inversion in lead aVL.
The number of physicians who did and did not identify the isolated TWI in lead aVL by specialty and training level.
| Groups | Identified TW | Not identified TW |
|---|---|---|
| EM1 | 2 | 3 |
| EM2 | 8 | 3 |
| EM3 | 2 | 10 |
| EM4 | 1 | 4 |
| EMA | 2 | 8 |
|
| ||
| FP1 | 5 | 9 |
| FP2 | 1 | 8 |
| FP3 | 4 | 8 |
| FPA | 1 | |
|
| ||
| IM1 | 6 | 30 |
| IM2 | 7 | 21 |
| IM3 | 5 | 16 |
| IM4 | 1 | |
| IMA | 3 | 2 |
|
| ||
| S1 | 9 | |
| S2 | 3 | |
| S3 | 1 | 4 |
| S4 | 2 | |
| S5 | 2 | |
| SA | ||
EM: Emergency Medicine; PF: Family Practice; IM: Internal Medicine; S: Surgery.
Figure 2(a) Number of physicians by training level and specialties. (b) Total number of physicians who identified TWI in lead aVL on ECG by training level and specialties.
Figure 3Dynamic T wave changes on ECG. (a) Upright T wave in lead aVL (black arrows, old ECG); (b) T wave flattening and early inversion in lead aVL (orange arrows, ECG at presentation); (c) TWI in lead aVL (red arrows, repeat ECG) and biphasic T waves in leads V2 and V3 (green arrows).
Figure 4Coronary angiography. (a) Mid-LAD lesion (red arrow) and no proximal LAD abnormality: (b) after placement of stent.
Figure 5Follow-up ECG: patient returned to the cardiology office and his repeat ECG demonstrated the upright T waves in lead aVL after the stent placement.