| Literature DB >> 25949745 |
P C Roussis1, A E Giannakopoulos2, H P Charalambous1.
Abstract
Suture line stress concentration and intimal hyperplasia are related to the long-term complications of end-toside and side-to-side anastomosis. Several factors, such as hemodynamic effects, biological activities and the mechanical properties of the blood vessels, are identified to influence the problem. Yet, it is not completely clear which are the factors that influence most the long-term complications and in what specific way. This study aims to examine if elastic (compliance) mismatch increases the stress concentration and intimal thickening at the suture line. Better compliance may be obtained by using grafts with similar mechanical properties to the host artery or by anastomosis techniques that utilize vein patches and cuffs (Taylor-patch and Miller-cuff anastomosis). The anastomosis model used in this study is a circular cylindrical system consisting of two semi-cylinders, interconnected by two hinges. The internal blood pressure is applied on the arterial walls. The static and dynamic responses are analytically derived in terms of radial and tangential displacements, internal forces and strains of the two blood vessels and rotation of their cross-section. Results suggest that increased elastic mismatch between the artery and the graft may promote elevated intimal thickening due to large incompatible angles at the junction, whereas there is no correlation between elastic mismatch and elevated stress concentration at the suture line. Another interesting application of the present model is the patching of arteries as applied in carotid endarterectomy.Entities:
Keywords: Artery patching; elastic mismatch; end-to-side anastomosis; side-to-side anastomosis; suture line intimal thickening; suture line stress concentration
Year: 2015 PMID: 25949745 PMCID: PMC4415203 DOI: 10.2174/1874120701509010001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Biomed Eng J ISSN: 1874-1207
Parameters of end-to-side anastomosis of Perktold et al. and response values as proposed by this study.
| Artery(II) /vein(I) | Artery(II) /ePTFE graft(I) | |
|---|---|---|
| 820 | 7500 | |
| 0.5 | 0.35 | |
| 0.3678 | 0.1175 | |
| 0.7356 | 0.7356 | |
| 2.439e-3 | 3.809e-4 | |
| 4.878e-3 | 4.878e-3 | |
| 0.00221 | 0.005271 | |
| ε I (0) / ε I (π / 2) | 0.0650/0.0652 | 0.0101/0.0102 |
| ε II (π / 2) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| uI (0) / uI (π / 2) (mm) | 0.173/0.092 | 0.053/-0.0006 |
| σ I (kPa) | 53.33 | 75.00 |
| σ II (kPa) | 53.32 | 53.32 |
Rotation angles at the anastomosis junction as proposed by this study.
| Artery(II) /vein(I) | Artery(II) /ePTFE graft(I) | |
|---|---|---|
| φI (0) (degrees) | -1.58 | -1.20 |
| φII (π / 2) (degrees) | -3.16 | -7.52 |
Parameters and response values of the patched carotid.
| Parameters | |
|---|---|
| p (kPa) | 17.332 |
| R (mm) | 5.5 |
| 0.3 | |
| 0.6 | |
| 8000 | |
| 845 | |
| θo (degrees) | 76 |
| Response values | |
| -0.00398 | |
| 0.000993 | |
| fs/(pR) | 1 |
| ε I (0) | 0.0397 |
| εII (π / 2 +θo | 0.188 |
| σ I (0) (kPa) | 317.76 |
| σII (π / 2 +θo ) (kPa) | 158.88 |
| -0.0529 | |
| | | 0.0128 |
| | | 1.985 |
| | | 0.0513 |
| | | 0.908 |
| φI (degrees) | -0.00185 |
| φ (π / 2 +θo (degrees) | -1.386 |
| φIII-φ (degrees) | -1.384 |
Comparison between results of Kamenskiy et al. and this study.
| Kamenskiy et al. calculations | This study | |
|---|---|---|
| Patch maximum cyclic strain | 0.02 | 0.0214 |
| Carotid maximum cyclic strain | 0.1 | 0.1012 |
| Patch far field stress log10 (σ eff ) (Pa) | 5.5 | 5.502 |
| Carotid far field stress log10 (σ eff ) (Pa) | 5.4 | 5.201 |